Member Info for news

Https://www.transparency.org/en/press/drc-accountability-glencore 17.6.24 [DRC: Para 4 $27.5m & $180m]

RRR DRC & FASO:

I just came in & re-checked the person to whom Chairman Bell replied to & furnished a PICTURE with caption: "Somewhere in Africa" when asked "Where are you Andrew" dated Sun 28 July 2024. Another poster followed this up by asking: "Where are you physically in the world at present..DRC, FASO, UK? " to which Chairman Bell replied by return: "Physically in AFRICA, spiritually London."

I looked at the 1st enquirer's Twitter handle and it stated: FINANCIAL SERVICES. It coincided with one saying he is in the DRC earlier ===and Chairman Bell NEVER refuted that ie it is either FASO or DRC from the latter reply. Today, one is told that Chairman Bell is still there given earlier he telephoned to ask. I am not surprised Chairman Bell office would reply given many AIM co's require a network of those working in financial services - the HNW would come from those circles.

IF, SAY , FOR EXAMPLE, Mr Bell is still in DRC, that would be in line with what was said in the last recent Stockbox interview ie DRC to be pressed ahead. If it is FASO, that is also good. Why? Chairman Bell cant be there forever kind of thing and hopefully we get to hear more ?

The info coming out is also helpful via 2 links I gave. DYOR, NIA. I am not privy and I dont have Mr Bell's telephone no or email so have to wait and see. Thur, 1 Aug 2024 @8.20pm.

Link: https://x.com/JavierBlas/status/1819021675691651304 1 Aug 2024 Javier Blas, Energy & Commodity Columnist Bloomberg.

Relevance: Industry news RRR DRC.

Helpful

On further reaction to your helpful post about shorts on RRR which i asked you if you can look at IG Index for the data, here are some observations:

[1] In the USA, sometimes when a stock is under stock squeeze, the BORROW rate is very high. But NO BORROW is not usual as for RRR, a small junior explorer that has low volume compared to other stocks on normal volume days.

[2] IG is now stating ONLY CLOSING shorts for RRR is also rather unusual and NO NEW SHORT POSITIONS to be OPENED for RRR. Its a double barrel.

[3] Also, the spread is 0.05-0.06p and live price has increased from early morning today, Thur, 1.8.24.

[4] 1 has appeared.

[5] Like bookies, IG Index must use some data to do the algo for the above. Like bookies, they must hire math's PhD's as well and they dont want to be opened to ...?

As an aside, with the tensions in the M.E, S & P 500 2.5x VIX NO LONGER CAN BE TRADED. I checked.

So, here's hoping that the next NEWS FROM RRR is x or y? I am not privy. News, Thur, 1.8.24 @4:10pm. NIA. DYOR.

Made my day, NikeAir180. Its just a habit. I marked my text in school books and beyond, so just carrying on but no

darkened print here or highlighter. Saves time looking for KEY words like "ALL ASSETS"? Recommend.

Lovely News Helpful. Looks like the firms offering shorts are NOT DAFT. It was most kind of you to take the trouble to keep your promise.

RRR has turned blue +4.76%. Spread is 0.05p and 0.06p.

Thanks Liquid Silver qualified.

Pick your positions folks. There are NO children here so decision is all up to oneself and dont say later, I meant to say etc.

All perspectives have been posted and everyone decides for themselves. Thur, 1 Aug 2024. News. DYOR. NIA.

I am NO longer reading anything your shadow says. I also skip your posts Banburyboy. You call names and that itself means of no relevance to be answered.

Cofounded said that this forum ...to you. Apparently, that is not true going from your shadow.?

Say anything you like but just because you and your shadow agree does not mean anything.

Is this a double speaking. Why is Banburyboy now answering as another person? I am ignoring. End of. Take it to the authorities.

The share price is telling the nays, they are trying to appear to stay relevant. Next will be hopefully a RRR RNS.

Hello Helpful.

I was wondering so its good you turned up. 1 and let's hope it is RRR news next.? Time is now given Mr Bell has been silent for some 16 hrs now in Africa.

Banburyboy

Can we take this to KPMG to review? You pay. Those are your former bosses. That way, it is impartial. They will FINE pick all the RRR RNS's. Fair. Up for this?

His last tweet was 16 hrs ago about "tort." On Sun,28 July 2024 , Mr Bell tweeted out a pic with French docu seen and he said HE WAS "IN AFRICA." On 30 July 2024, an investor asked Mr Bell if he was in FASO, DRC or London. Mr Bell replied by return: "PYSICALLY IN AFRICA, spiritually in London."

1 has just turned up and spread improved and so did live prices at around noon+.

Let's see as Maidit308 because Mr Bell cant be in that 1 place indefinately, so hopefully NEWS ?

What sort, I dont know nor does Maid308 know as said. Thur, 1 Aug 2024.

Banburyboy

If your statement per your 17:41 post of last night was taken into account, it cannot stand. It is WHOLLY WRONG for Mr Bolitho's £182k debt conversion to be ABLE or "could TAKE ALL THE ASSETS" ? ALL? Just for £182k? How? NikeAir180 corrected you and so did Helpful.

I am NOT longer replying to Specinvestor99. The topic is closed. Banburyboy has replied twice to my posts and he is the originator of the Mr Bolitho convo. No one wants any DISCOURSE today. No, Caps is NOT shouting. There is no darkened print on this site.

Just jumped from earlier. Live price as well.

Banburyboy: Dont say NEWS pays NO heed. Why ? The Bolitho conversion was some £182,000 and that would have also taken in the interest and any other incentive. So, to say Mr Bolitho even in LAW CAN TAKE RRR £19M ASSETS MINUS LIABILITY OF SOME £3.7M IS NOT CORRECT OR TRUE IS IT , IN LAW, given he is an "UNSECURED LENDER". As AirNike180 said, the administrator say, in , an example gets to call all the LEGAL SHOTS and Mr Bolitho, say, will only be an UNSECURED LENDER --academic.

1 has just appeared.

I cite the RRR RNS 1/2 yr results to 31.12.24 RNS of 28 Mar 2024:

"TOTAL ASSETS: £19.105 Million.

TOTAL LIABILITIES: £3.741."

MR BOLITHO: RRR RNS, 4JULY 2024

Converted his £182,328 lending to RRR for 405m shares at 0.045p.

RRR RNS 10 July 2024: Mr Bolitho 's TR1 stated he has 9.9% share of RRR shares.

In the 4 July 2024 RRR RNS, it was stated Mr Bolitho "supports this co and its prospects."

BANBURYBOY, WED, 31.7.24 @17:41:

"JG Bolitho a major holder of shares plus loan===COULD TAKE A L L THE ASSETS FOR HIMSELF."

EXAGGERATION?

Say one went to Bank of Joe, asked for a £10k loan and had £1m in assets. Can the bank take £1m for lending £10k? Surely not? NikeAir180 explained last night NO lender gets to grab as it will be the administrator. Helpful said the order kind of thing. In law, Mr Bolitho has NOT put a CHARGE on RRR assets at COMPANIES HOUSE GOVT UK so his loan is "UNSECURED" ie not secured in law by way of a charge.

BIG U TURN NOW BY BANBURYBOY. Now that the RRR RNS 4th July 2024 has been cited, Banburyboy now accepts with silence and reply that the next conversion ===BUT , BUT, didnt he say Mr Bolitho to take "ALL THE ASSETS of RRR? ALL?"

Ah, RRR 4 th July 2024 was CONVENIENTLY LEFT OUT.

In any judicial review, the deliberations would have taken days IF NOT WEEKS to peel layer by layer , hence last night's discourse elicited the final outcome as above. DYOR. NIA. Thur, 1.8.24

SILENCE NOW----------

So, last night, it may have been a long discourse but in the end, it was deciphered that the RRR RNS of 4th July 2024 was not given as the reference to check. Why? In checking the exact verbatim wording of this RNS would not favour . So, there is now a U TURN by Banburyboy. Silence now. I have waited for his reply as that is a right under rule of law in Britain.

So, let us say now, I can stand at the mirror and look at myself and say, to the school I went to, I did NOT compromise the principles taught of the R.C. NikeAir180 has also had to stand for that which is right and that is also commendable. Helpful has rightly stated there is an order taught in company law as to rights of shareholders etc and then lenders. The fact remains that Mr Bolitho 's position without a charge in Companies House [not denied by Banburyboy ], he appears to be an "unsecured lender."

Maidit308, HaiwaiiFive0 also have stated what is right: One must decide for self after hearing the actual, not assumptions and only invest what one CAN AFFORD to LOSE , as is true for AIM co's especially since they carry a higher risk.

Last night, I clicked on to a wrong thread, 12 years ago and to my surprise I read a conversation on this forum of how one sold at 18p and another 12p and the latter made some £27,000 - Helpful also said that then Bell was a "superhero." So, contrary to what folks who are not shareholders said, there were folks that made perhaps life-changing amounts, given the poster who said 18p for RRR said it set him on his road to investing via RRR which is a hint of what he made.

That's all on this subject matter. So, for CLARITY - that is the balance and as HawaiiFive0 said "OPTION MONEY" @RRR.

So, DYOR, NIA. News, 1 Aug 2024 @11:17am.

I waited for a REPLY from Banburyboy at 10:04am, Thur, 1 Aug 2024 as that is the rule of law in Britain ie right of reply.

FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT:

Banburyboy at 10.32am ,1.8.24 [Thur] now states: "MR BOLITHO he = HAD TO HAVE SHARES". So, you fans over the other forum and here , Banburyboy in his own words, verbatim appears to have PREVARICATED and gone back on his post last night at 17:41 of "Mr Bolitho ==TAKE A L L THE ASSETS"= [Note plural & exact quote below].

So, with my reply of 10:04am today, 1.8.24 to his post , Banburyboy now appears to realise his "MISTAKE" as to how anyone can "take all the assets" of RRR which is INTO MILLIONS [see First Equity's last broker note 2023].

Also, Banburyboy appears to realise [2] that the RRR RNS of 4th July 2024 stated Mr Bolitho "supports this co and its prospects in regard to his lending" -------------NO DENIAL FROM BANBURYBOY NOW so he now changes tack and states: Re: Mr Bolitho : "ANOTHER 400M IN LIEU OF INTEREST SHORTLY." 10:32am, 1.8.24.

----------LoL, see folks it now appears to be another U turn by Banburyboy from last night at 17:41 of "take ALL THE ASSETS" of RRR to now "ANOTHER 400M in lieu of interest shortly" as above.-----------

==========ANOTHER WILD ASSUMPTION. Why? No where does it say another 400m shares to be given, nor does anywhere say shortly either. =======I REST MY CASE. In a review, I think both my posts and Banburyboy's post appears to show his mistakes [plural ie 2 as above]. Isnt it?

Hence, why non-shareholders are posting and one must look at the verbatim, check the RNS and verify what is assumption, wild assumptions vs the rules. Isnt it? 1.8.24 @10.48am. END OF THE SUBJECT MATTER.