RE: Wishbone Gold BEFORE @Hole 1 Assay. Mon, 20 Oct 202520 Oct 2025 20:31
@Accionista in reply:
Fist of all, there is NO need to question me at all, absolutely no need to as it is not a court inquisition from the opposing barrister. In Britain, you can easily correct it diplomatically. I POST and if there is an error, just correct especially it is WELL OUTSIDE the stock market hours. You say I am "DEFENDING" with all sort of "STRANGE CLAIMS" and that you appear to be "CHALLENGING ME" [inverted from your terminology ie "challenged", "defending" & "strange claims"].
NO, I LEGALLY CONFIRM that I did not make up any "strange claims" . Why? I saw your satellite photo and it was late at night. Before I typed today's post as above I used "KM" from looking at your satellite pic MARKED "KM" when a/c to the WSBN RNS it is 160m for example. EASY MISTAKE made . In a Court of Law, one can make errors easily and when asked, I check and provide the verbatim from the WSBN RNS. There is NO price sensitive issue here and someone else corrected it without chiding etc or "challenging". In a Court of Law, I can show that at night, I saw your satellite pic and I have a photographic memory [most times ] and KM stuck in my mind. I think this ends the conversation because you "appreciate" my posts , it appears to conflict asking me again and again, like a court barrister isnt it? It seems that way dont you think so? Otherwise, if your "appreciate" my posts , you would have corrected it like the OTHER POSTER isnt it? Mon, 20.10.25 I wont be answering because to and fro will be of no further use ?