Member Info for news

Dealer55

Since you named me about putting ..to sleep. I provide you the courtesy of a reply. Last night, someone asked me to post because after the whole day, they wanted to hear something from me. So, I posted and said it was too late to post more and I would post today and I have. Yeah, it would appear that I am being picked over nothing. That is why a lot of INFO is passing through but I notice that the views are a lot but NO ONE will post on this forum or the other WSBN forum. I dont wonder why.

Dont understand the header. That was posted by typing by Solgold on Twitter. Solgold tweeted: "ABOVE US$4,100." Why did Solgold use the Mining.com article? To prove it as they are a co. All explained already by others. I gave the link to what Solgold posted themself by typing that GOLD has set a new record "ABOVE US$4,100" .

@Accionista in reply:

Fist of all, there is NO need to question me at all, absolutely no need to as it is not a court inquisition from the opposing barrister. In Britain, you can easily correct it diplomatically. I POST and if there is an error, just correct especially it is WELL OUTSIDE the stock market hours. You say I am "DEFENDING" with all sort of "STRANGE CLAIMS" and that you appear to be "CHALLENGING ME" [inverted from your terminology ie "challenged", "defending" & "strange claims"].

NO, I LEGALLY CONFIRM that I did not make up any "strange claims" . Why? I saw your satellite photo and it was late at night. Before I typed today's post as above I used "KM" from looking at your satellite pic MARKED "KM" when a/c to the WSBN RNS it is 160m for example. EASY MISTAKE made . In a Court of Law, one can make errors easily and when asked, I check and provide the verbatim from the WSBN RNS. There is NO price sensitive issue here and someone else corrected it without chiding etc or "challenging". In a Court of Law, I can show that at night, I saw your satellite pic and I have a photographic memory [most times ] and KM stuck in my mind. I think this ends the conversation because you "appreciate" my posts , it appears to conflict asking me again and again, like a court barrister isnt it? It seems that way dont you think so? Otherwise, if your "appreciate" my posts , you would have corrected it like the OTHER POSTER isnt it? Mon, 20.10.25 I wont be answering because to and fro will be of no further use ?

2 SATELLITE PICTURES OF WSBN RED SETTER, PATERSON, WESTERN AUSTRALIA FROM ACCIONISTA ON TWITTER, 18 OCT 2025.

Link: https://x.com/Accionista16/status/1979544813516034287

Accionista: In your question to me TWICE asking me and I quoted you the actual 25 Sep 2025 RNS from WSBN, I decided to look at the above 2 satellite pictures and IF you are the SAME ACCIONISTA on Twitter who put out the 2 Satellite pictures of Wishbone Gold at Red Setter------------I note that in your 2nd picture you QUOTED: " 1. 6 KM " from Hole 1 & 2 ie Hole 3. Ah, so late at night I saw it again and must have remembered KM and posted it as KM, NOT METRES. LoL ? Mon, 20 OCT 2025. Appears I COPIED YOUR "MISTAKE =TYPO" isnt it??

By the way, for CLARITY: I will correct my post to be more accurate: LITIGATION CANNOT BE FOR A TYPO eg copied wrongly etc. This is also especially since my post was time-stamped OFFICIALLY on this site at 17:58, Mon, 20 Oct 2025. 17:58pm is 5.58pm AFTER THE STOCK MARKET has CLOSED AT 4.30pm.

So, it is not LIVE or PRICE SENSITIVE IN ANY WAY etc.

Accionista : I quoted you verbatim from the WSBN RNS of 25 Sep 2025. Since you produced the SATELLITE MAP, you do know the DISTANCES and the various RNS. I have goodwill towards you and gave you ATTRIBUTION when I posted your link. Yes, I followed someone's typo. No need surely to make a "song and dance" about it, unless you want to "sue me" for a typo? We are all here for 1 purpose - as fellow holders of WSBN and just correct if you think it is wrong.

Link to PROVE it was from 2 hrs ago, Mon, 20 Oct 2025. https://x.com/SolGold_plc/status/1980280445532029054 dated and time stamped by Twitter at 20 Oct 2025. Solgold follows me on Twitter, hence it came on my feed and I shared it as the price of gold as tweeted by them as above title.

From News to Accionista. YES, FROM WSBN RNS , 25 Oct 2025 [Assume you are the one producing the satellite pic of Red Setter & know the distance?

Answer: "Wishbone Gold HITS ___STRONG ALTERATION with MINERALISATION at Red Setter ."- 25 Sep 2025, ShareTalk

[1] Ref Quote: "2nd drill hole STEP OUT ____2 0 0 m____South West ___ F R O M __ HOLE 1 __with breccia zone at 520m."

Link: https://www.share-talk.com/wishbone-gold-plc-aimaqse-wsbn-drilling-hits-strong-alteration-at-red-setter/

[2]Ref Quote: "SECOND drill hole STEP-OUT 200m with mineralisation at Red Setter Gold Dome Project in Western Australia."-London Stock Exchange RNS, 25 Sep 2025 [To check, go to page at the top of this page and check WSBN RNS for free].

Comment: YES, 200m step out as above is CONFIRMED from an official WSBN RNS.

Link: https://x.com/SolGold_plc/status/1980280445532029054 Article from Mining.com. Mon, 20 Oct 2025, 2 hrs ago @6:10pm

Comment: Remember Sarah Lowther, Focus interview asking Ed Mead about GOLD PRICE ?

WSBN Red Setter, Paterson, W.Australia.

Hole 1 ended at 777m due to lack of drill rods starting 520m= Potentially___257m__.

Hole 2 ended at 950m starting 520m = Potentially __430m___.

Hole 3: RC rig starts tomorrow to hit target depth 500m from 300m. Potentially:___?

TOTAL DISTANCE:

Hole 2 is 2km from Hole 1. Hole 3 is 1.6km = 3.6km vs Havieron 3.5km continuity proven [expert requires to see continuity as norm]

I checked again last night & it has been DELETED. Why? Given that R.Poulden was a barrister, the procedure is: If a statement is made , then it has to be REPLIED to [rule of right of reply]. Mr Poulden said : Interview by WSBN - all in the "PUBLIC DOMAIN".

If the other party is still NOT satisfied with the reply, __they will repeat or re-state 101__. Then, it will have to go to the authority or through the normal processes. But as I said, it CANNOT go unanswered per 101. I checked and have found NO further reply by the other side? Technically, the reply can then be deleted. Caveat: I am NOT privy but that is what is normal standard procedure isnt it? [I used isnt it, in case folks dont see ?] Mon, 20.10.25

P.S. A new satellite picture has been posted on Twitter and this time by someone whom Wishbone Gold reposted on Linkedin. This is relating to Hole 3 new drilling to come via RC drilling scheduled for tomorrow, 21 Oct 2025 per WSBN 17 Oct 2025 RNS.

Pgal, my full post didnt come out so I will post tomorrow. I am off for some nice black tea and my salad.

Contd : My post was cut off. Sorry.

"TOTAL: 1.6km [distance between new Hole 3 from Hole 2 /1 and 2km from Hole 2 to 1] + 2KM = 3.6KM vs GREATLAND HAVIERON CONTINUITY 3.5KM via 9 holes drilled and after that Newcrest JV in with a US$65m deal and all the drilling done by Newcrest to PFS as part of the deal & as the OPERATOR.

Link to check: https://x.com/Accionista16/status/197954481351603428 dated 18 Oct 2025 at 2:47pm. [2 Satellite pics + SHINY CORE from previous Hole 8 , now called Hole 3 and current drill is to 500m. Previous drill was TO 273M with RESULTS: 1 4m @ 1g/t GOLD & 0.2% COPPER FROM 266m including 7M @ 2 g/t GOLD & 0.38% COPPER from 273m. AND 1m @ 6.4 g/t GOLD & 0.69% COPPER FROM 273M." [Click on the 2nd satellite picture to see the previous grade then called Hole WRSDD008.

SO, A SURFACE EXPESSION would be to 500m which is the TARGET DEPTH FOR CURRENT DRILLING OF HOLE 3. Why? It is known that to 500m , it is suitable for OPEN PIT vs Hole 1 & 2 Red Setter just drilled a deeper target.

Post 64/64, Sun 19 Oct 2025 meeting the request of pgal to post.

GOOD NEWS: WSBN @Red Setter HOLE 3 has already STARTED DRILLING & on ___double shift__ [DC rig].

The Reverse Circulation rig [RC] is due to arrive on Tues, 21 Oct 2025 per 17.10.25 RNS @WSBN.

How do I know and proof? A SATELLITE pic was on Twitter dated 18 Oct 2025 @2:47pm & sent via Twitter to Chairman Poulden, Ed Mead Chief Geologist, WSBN & D.Lenigas , Consultant - if this is NOT correct, they can correct. This tweet also included the WSBN RNS of 17 Oct 2025. SO, BY TOMORROW @ 2:47pm , 2 DAYS OF DOUBLE SHIFT DRILLING [ using DC] in gear.

Of interest is the above Satellite picture and where the Hole 3 is located + THAT WONDERFUL CORE shown [the shiny one which DL flew to Perth then to view.] Per 17 Oct 2025 RNS @WSBN, Hole 3 is ________1.6KM______from Hole 2. Hole 2 is ________2KM___from Hole 1 at Red Setter. TOTAL: 1.6km +2km =

Last night I posted in reply to Montyfinio and thereafter, no more discussion which means solved. Many may not like research & besides trying to find the latest news is pretty hard work eg looking at Linkedin etc. No, Cebo65 may not be aware that bots DONT do research - they are made of GPU's computer chips & cannot initiate on their own questions relating to WSBN to look for data. So, I am still around this site and leaving others to discuss their "ideas" for the meantime. News, Sat, 18 Oct 2025 @4:15pm.

On HC, Australia , they have a thread entitled: "Wishbone Gold" . On HC, they print in the chat rules , not to make ....you know what. One of the big cases on Twitter was 1 person making statements about a CEO. I wont name names but I have just called it up and on 9 Jan 2023, the chap had to pay out A$300,000 in damage and this was posted in the press then. On this site of London South East, a poster also got taken to the High Court making all sorts of statements which results in a "substantial" payment as well. Hope that helps Montyfino with your statement to me as it could involve WSBN by legal implication isnt it? I have provided my LEGAL STATEMENT. No one is about so no one can complain. WE, AS IN INVESTORS ON THIS FORUM of course want to see WSBN do well and we share what we can and on X as well and isnt that what a forum is for including GOODWILL TOWARDS EACH OTHER?

On page 1 of your open file archive on this site, I wanted to get a sense of what you mean and IF, I am reading it correctly, you have said this and that about the interview and someone else gave a full transcript of the interview by Chairman Poulden and therefore, you have gone back to Greatland. So, looks like you appear to be interested in WSBN isnt it. Now, that I have read 2 pages of your posting, I think I have nothing to answer for. Why? LoL , you think Ho is COLIN BIRD HIMSELF? On that forum, they think whoever is positive of XTR is Colin Bird and not only Ho ? So, I think enough said. Thank you. News. 18.10.25 Off now for tea.

P.S Montifino As a matter of getting some clarity relating to what you said about XTR , it was 2020 to late 2021. On page 18 of your open file archive on XTR which you mentioned you were from, you stated this: " XTR, 25 Feb 2025: Monifino posted: HOW MANY LSE ACCOUNTS HAVE YOU GOT GUY." On 27 Feb 2025 Monifino posted on XTR: " Ho [wont spell out the full name] or COLIN in damage limitation now. So the board are feeding the forum with duff info."

Comment: From the example above just to see what you mean by you have seen me at XTR, you have been a member SINCE AUG 2021

Montyfino @23 39, Fri, 17 Oct 2025: Your statement to me: " Montyfino to news: Who is PAYING you news? Most wont remember you from XTR but I do."

My direct reply as a courtesy at 12:00 [forum closed]: If you read my "For the attention of Chairman Poulden on this forum for the title" - the 3 people on this forum said the same thing as you but once I made a LEGAL DECLARATION, they backed down. Why? Once I have made statement which is is also copied to the Managing Director of London South East, there is nothing to answer for.

MY LEGAL AND FULL STATMENT TO MONTYFINO: I , NEWS, a member of London South East, do , and LEGALLY CONFIRM that I am NOT PAID directly or indirectly by WSBN or any other co as asserted. No one is discussing the WSBN RNS of today, 17 Oct 2025 but I brought it up as everyone or some are confused by the RNS vs the interview yesterday. I ALSO LEGALLY CONFIRM AND STATE THAT MY SHARES IN WSBN are present in my stockbroking account. On this site, I have been a long term member and have a good standing and voted London South East TOP RANKED for my time when I was at the London South East [this site] forum at Solgold. I trust this explains matters. Impliedly, if I read your statement, then I have stated that if WSBN can command an article written by the Editor of Investor's Chronicle with over 200k unique users among the wealthy stated by their site and with Daily Mail twice, the largest circulation paper in Britain with 900,000 users and more on Sat, there is NO need for PR here. ALSO , FROM A REGULATORY STANDPOINT, NO ONE HAS EVER BEEN FOUND TO BE WORKING FOR ANY CO AND THE FCA HAS NEVER DEFAULTED ANYONE or any co in this regard. IT IS WELL KNOWN from the new rules under MifI do not allow in many cases for a broker report to be issued as such [see details] and MANY OF US, have to step up with research to share with others. CLARITY - the ball is in your ball court and if still asserted, then WSBN and Chairman Poulden will have to get involved as well to MADE A LEGAL DECLARATION no one has been hired by them given they can command Investor's Chronicle , a Financial Times Group of co's in their write up. News. Thank you. 17.7.25 Without Prejudice.

Whatever the code is by aha etc below, NO, I dont think so. Otherwise, the interview would have to be rescinded or altered or deleted. Still on, so the last word is still the interview and the new article isnt it? I am just guessing what the aha and D means?