RE: Andrew McMillan Bell, Chairman of RRR: DRC Award Arbitration & Int. Arbitration1 Apr 2024 15:01
Zumore:
So, you now CONFIRM that the RRR broker note does STATE: US$430m. Your suggestion it is from A.Bell is up to you. As I have stated before, we are living in the UNITED KINGDOM, not some no law regulatory environment. You are free to think what you like but the above is in BLACK AND WHITE , as contained in a RRR Broker note and the broker is a broker to RRR in addition to the NOMAD. Perhaps, you may think that in the UK, everything is based on one's word and LEGAL EVIDENCE AND PROOF is NOT REQUIRED. Even if I want to speak to the Mgr of the Bank or before I can transact above the norm, I have to SHOW AML proof. Even the broker has to do AML etc checks.
RRR RNS, 28 MAR 2024:
It mentioned "several millions" did it not relating to the RRR DRC asset [JV]. So, is US$430m NOT "several millions" ? May I also respectfully remind you that you said "$430m" was a "LIE" --------now you have checked for yourself the RRR broker note and it is NOT SO, isnt it? So, I take a implied apology.
LAW101
You appear to be NOT conversant enough of Law 101 international arbitration and DRC asset litigation in general and in particular + 2 SEC & SFO investigations etc. This is GENERAL DRC background law precedent cases - Pinsent Mason gives a guideline as well on DRC assets etc which I have posted. It is ONLY your opinion that RRR'S JV PARTNER "SURRENDERED" the licences to Gecamine and US$20m. You call it "AMICABLE TERMINATION." How CHARMING? Why? Oh, I own 1/2 a house with my sister and I surrender it to a buyer? Well, if that is what you appear to understand, then it is NOT LAW in the UK that one can "surrender" what is NOT 100% the owner's. So, the international miner that bought it has DONE "NO WRONG" a/c to you. Then, you should read AVZ [largest lithium deposit in the world]. AVZ of Oz has already got an INTERIM WIN. DRC took back the LICENCES and another major is going to develop it last I read. AVZ international litigation is into the FINAL ROUND ie both sides to present but it is rather clear what will happen or NOT. If someone sells their sister's 50% share of a house, they dont own, then the BUYER has not got good TITLE and is subject to litigation. RRR HAS CONSULTED UK COUNSEL on both DRC LITIGATION AND INTERATIO;NAL LITIGATION -refer RRR RNS, 28 Mar 2024 [1/2 yr report]. Maybe, you are of the opinion, NO LEGAL EVIDENCE HAS TO BE SHOWN and its is hearsay but that is up to you. DYOR. NIA. Mon, 1 Apr 2024 [Public Hol, Stock Mkt closed].