Member Info for news

Blueboy1975 : Poster only posts on RRR, no where else.

Banburyboy : Poster only posts on RRR, no where else.

Why Boy?

RRR: "Market Valuation pretty much 0."-Poster BB @22:50, Sun, 31.3.24.

---------INCORRECT.---------MKT CAP £1.94M @0.056p.

INVESTOPEDIA DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: "The price the =====ASSET===would fetch in the market.."

RRR ASSETS minus LIABILITY =VALUATION.

RRR ASSETS £19.05M - LIABILITIES £3.741= £15.309M. [RRR RNS, 28 Mar 2024: "1/2 year report/accounts].

I dont want to use Gary's surname but it is now in the public domain in precedent CASE LAW of a listed co suing a shareholder of RRR [obvious what the legal case was about]. Mr Gary said this and that of RRR [British understatement] and in the London High Court, he had to issue an APOLOGY unreservedly to the effect it had no merits/s? Wont go over old ground. The same thing is repeating ---on this forum again? Not what I say but what Mr Bell appears to have said. I dont know as I was not here? Who is now the CHIEF Naysayer? Instead of the Chief Naysayer, the junior Naysayer has replied but this time, NO ONE liked his post after I pointed it out, they may be a "CONSORTIUM" from the likes? I AM SURE BIG MONEY IS INVOLVED? Mr Bell, Chairman of RRR said that shorters are at work on X ? Today, I posted that in CANADA, CLASS ACTION is being prepared for billion $ case vs naked short selling which has caused Canadian miners $40m? Australians are also gathering signatures and a video was going to be posted. So, not isolated anymore. RRR appears to be also affected? I dont know as I have NOT been here long enough but I now await to see what happens next and the only solution is to ask for help from the London Stock Exchange OR RRR informs the NOMAD. ? What other solution is there?

Get FACTS RIGHT:

"MARKET CAPITALISATION: £1.94M @ 0.056p."

NOT MARKET VALUATION.

HUUUUUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MKT VALUATION VS MKT CAPITALISATION 101.

HOUSE IS AN ASSET - WORTH- VALUED.

SAME WITH RRR -VALUATION = ASSETS MINUS LIABILITIES = 101 WHICH EVEN A KID WILL KNOW.

How? I have £100 in my bank [liquid asset] and I have to minus £10 owed to Mum [liability] 101.

STRANGE NAYSAYERS POST ------------ONLY ON RRR-----------Now they dare not name Helpful by his FULL PERSONAL NAME and HIS PROFESSION and label ...on him. Why? Maybe, the "boss" is aware that it is ....? Dont know. No more names for me either -boss must have checked? LoL. Sun, 31.3.24.

Yawn?

Deal with ASSETS -FACT.

RRR RNS: "1/2 year report" ]A/c's] shows " £ 1 3 , 3 5 8 MILLION" ["Exp Assets"] + £1.030 MILLION Inv in asso. & JV etc "

"TOTAL ASSETS : £19.05 MILLION.

TOTAL LIABILITIES: £3.741 MILLION."

----------------------FACTS ABOVE -PROOF & EVDENCE: FROM RRR A/CS.---------------

dated 28 Mar 2024 [Thur]. vs RRR Mkt Cap : £1.94 MILLION @0.056p.-----------

-------------All else is fluff from naysayers.?----STOCK MKT VALUATION.---FACT.

-----------------ALL SHAREHOLDERS OF RED ROCK RESOURCES-----------

Red Rock Resources has issued an RNS: "HALF-YEAR REPORT"[Accounts] dated Thur, 28 Mar 2024. In this RNS, Chairman A.Bell has set out CLEARLY the strategy going forward in the 1st para and is cognisant that this co has to try to obtain cash generation if there is a delay to the RRR DRC legal action ie Award of $10m USD ----------and has also mentioned , in black and white that RRR will FURTHER CONSULT COUNSEL relating to REMEDIES [usually taken to mean legal remedies] OUTSIDE DRC and "other parties." It is very material that ALL THE RRR PROJECTS are clearly stated in this 1/2 YR A/C's RNS. This forum only consist of me and MADIIT308 as holders vs others who are NOT holders. Or if they are holders, they would not ask if the RRR AGM of 16.2.24 was even real? Why should it not be real as AGM's must be conducted? I have heard that in one AGM, the NOMAD was present even. As said, one person on Twitter tweeted Mr A.Bell , Chairman of RRR that he attended with his young son.

I do NOT know how far the naysayers are prepared to go beyond calling me NAMES that this site will NOT allow or even in the work place etc. A/c to some articles I have read in the past, it will NOT STOP until it goes to the point of NO MORE return by which time, it is serious as norm? BEARING THIS IN MIND, IT IS REASONABLE THAT AS A HOLDER OF RRR , I wish NOT to lose my $$$ over this on-going ...on RRR CALLING INTO QUESTION EVERY RRR RNS THAT IS APPROVED OR REVIEWED BY A NOMAD. Surely, the NOMAD will HAVE SEEN THE DRC "AWARD DRAFT "as contained in the RRR RNS.

If anyone is reading given there are MANY SHAREHOLDERS of RRR [ I checked the shareholder list that is publicly available and Joe/Jane public own RRR stock, bar the 3 large holders., then I alone cant stand this BARRAGE from a "group" [4 likes and then 2 likes for this said chief here on this forum] here appears to be supporting the CHIEF-UNOFFICIAL ,UNAUTHORISED OVER-SIGHT .

---------------IF YOU FEEL THAT THIS CONSTANT QUESTIONING OF EVERY RRR RNS APPROVED OR REVIEWED BY THE NOMAD WILL AFFECT THIS CO IE RRR, THEN IT IS TIME TO ASK FOR HELP FROM THE LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE AIM REGULATION. WHY? IT IS CALLING INTO QUESTION THE WHOLE AIM REGULATORY BODY OF THE LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE. YES, IT DOES AFFECT SHARE PRICE AS IT IS BRINGING INTO "DISREPUTE" THE RNS/NOMAD system of the London Stock Exchange AIM for NO GOOD REASON. ? Just the 2 examples is EVIDENTIAL and PROOF.

--------------PLEASE CONTACT LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE AIM REGULATION -------------especially if anyone has $$$ in RRR.

I cant see any other solution to this impasse except the London Stock Exchange AIM Regulation given it has gone beyond the norm. TO-DATE, NO UNDECLARED LOAN HAS SHOWN UP IN THE ACCOUNTS -THE CHIEF ON THIS FORUM SAID ONE COULD SEE A "NASTY" SURPRISE? NONE BUT NOW THE CHIEF HERE ON THIS FORUM HAS GONE SILENT ON THIS & ISSUE OF SHARES,AGM RES4. 16.2.24.

The two posts by the "UNOFFICIAL , UNAUTHORISED , over-sight" has 4 likes and then 2 likes. Is this a consortium?

This said "over-sight unofficial" says ONLY A NOMAD RNS will do. BUT ALL THE RRR RNS'S ARE NOMAD APPROVED , bar 2 which was an update with NO sensitive info. So, it is a CONTRADICTION is it not, so why 4 person's liked and then 2? Has the over-sight unofficial FLOWN TO BURKINA FASO at this moment to check WORKS? IF NOT, how can this unofficial , unauthorised over-sight [1 person] KNOW? ALL OVER-SIGHT NEEDS CHECKING. So, before posting, make sure CHECKS ARE DONE.?

--------------------RRR SHAREHOLDERS vs Naysayers----------------

One is playing for very big stakes here. Like how? Calling into question: DID THE RRR AGM, 16 FEB 2024 EVEN TAKE PLACE? It DID - evidenced by 1 person that tweeted to Chairman Bell, RRR on Twitter that he attended with his young son.!!!

Call into question RRR RNS, 28.3.24 ["1/2 yr report/accounts] that "SEVERAL MILLIONS" were lost due to RRR's Musoni taken and RE-SOLD. Call into question that US$430M was a lie that was lost ---however, it is in BLACK & WHITE via the RRR Broker Report ie Clean Capital who happens to be the RRR broker.

Call into question EVERY RRR RNS re: project/s. Why? It is all not true. NOT TRUE? RRR RNS viewed and previewed BY A REGULATORY NOMAD? And by the RRR Broker because RRR has a NOMAD and broker. Who to believe? A "unofficial , no name poster/s" who are acting without AUTHORITY ? How? Do any of these poster/s go to the PROJECT SITES OF RRR to CHECK -SP ANGEL goes to sites to check. So, this "UNOFFICIAL, UNAUTHORISED OVERSIGHT" by 1 poster? What is the end-game? Obvious or not? True or False.? RRR-LET US HOPE THAT SHAREHOLDERS will not be affected by all these narratives of naysayers ------it CANT BE THE CO, NOMAD, BROKER , JV PARTNERS , LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE needs unofficial unauthorised oversight? Nomad CANT BE REVIEWING DRC AWARD ARBITRATION RNS without seeing THE "DRAFT AWARD" which RRR has been issued with? Let us hope that RRR can protect this co and shareholders.? Sun, 31.3.24.

Link: https://twitter.com/drjimjonesceo/status/177426665308933409 31.3.24

It was discussed at this recent PDAC mining conference in Toronto, Canada. Looks like they are going to do something about it via class action.

HOTCOPPER -AUSTRALIA : I visited one forum [dual listing ie UK/Oz] and they are also gathering signatures after a video is posted up as well.

Chairman Bell mentioned this on Twitter about RRR re: shorting etc. Interesting that something is being done. Sun, 31.3.24.

Not is, but should read : has. Sorry.

"Is the small-cap market BROKEN."-ShareTalk, 22 hrs ago. [Article embedded].

From the article, it was stated HNW are leaving the AIM market.!!! Stocks are illiquid!!!

Well, it would now appear, this is NO LONGER restricted to RRR alone.

So, in FACT, all the naysayers have made the situ at RRR even worse than it should be?

Me, I look around and FIND out [try to] what is happened and whether this is just RRR.

Appears not.

"Placings:

Baron Oil- 0.14p a year ago, raised at 0.05p.

ARC Minerals -3.9p in Nov 2023, raised at 1.8p with warrants,

Avacta -1.54p in Oct 2023, raised at 50p.

Tek Capital -17p a fortnight ago before due to successful Microsalt IPO, raised at 10p.

Mkango- 12.25p mid-Dec 2023, raised at 5p.

Cizzle -2.6p the day before, raised 2p.

IS THE SMALL CAP MARKET BROKEN?."

https://twitter.com/Share_Talk/status/1774411613526806775

P.S.

Just had lunch. POSTING OF HELPFUL'S [poster] FULL PERSONAL NAME & PROFESSIONAL also is along the same lines as POSTING Andrew Bell, Chairman's PERSONAL ADDRESS - same rules apply on this site and on other sites for obvious reasons. WHAT IS THE OBJECTIVE given the "UNOFFICIAL" "OVERSIGHT" person [1] stated and pointed out Mr Bell thanking "FUNDERS" for RRR. Yes, IF, funders did NOT FUND RRR, holders would NOT be still here and this is norm is it not? Everything follows a procedure and SCALE. What sort of scale? The scale that funding is at a DISCOUNT to the s/price. It tends to be STEEP at the moment from the co's I have thus seen, even in Oz.

I dont want to spell out why PERSONAL FULL NAMES/profession or personal address MUST NOT BE PUBLISHED on any website. One can look at Chat Rules and sites reserve the right to....see details. ME AND MAIDIT308, being shareholders are ALSO subject to NAME CALLING, some of which this site or other sites do NOT allow and permanent bans. They are not light names but of a more ...nature. But what IF I post further to provide BALANCE, CHECKS & BALANCES IE LAW 101? I dont know but suffice to say, it is not something that is SEEN on ANY STOCK FORUM on this site or other sites?

Hence, I ask what IS THE OBJECTIVE? What IF the objective is NOT MET? What then? A question for RRR & Chairman. Yes, No? Unfortunately, it has to be now aired. Why? It has so "worked up" folks by this "UNOFFICIAL OVERSIGHT" [1] that someone tweeted to CALL on the "POLICE" re: RRR DRC NEWS of which this tweeter MUST KNOW THAT THE INFO CANNOT BE GIVEN at that time UNLESS IT IS IN AN RNS. RRR RNS of Thur, 28 Mar 2024 :"1/2 year report" [a/c's , Chairman's statement & project updates ] have come out as it should be. STILL NOT SATISFIED. ==========RRR SHARE PRICE IS AT ITS LOWEST IN ITS HISTORY AND MKT CAP========still not satisfied that all projects have been literally WRITTEN DOWN inspite of ASSETS? Sun, 31.3.24 IT IS NOT ONLY ME THAT HAS OBSERVED THIS SINCE ALMOST NO CO ON AIM ie junior explorer IS EXEMPT --------NOT EVEN THE LIKES OF GGP OR SOLGOLD as they took need funding to move forward as norm. ISNT THAT WHAT THE LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE HAS EXPLAINED TO FOLKS ABOUT AIM- it is to FUND growth co's etc. YES, FOLKS ARE AKIN TO ANGEL INVETORS, hence why not suitable for ordinary folks who put in more than they can afford [to lose]. ON TWITTER, IT WAS SAID, IT IS THE WORST for a long time for junior explorers and they hope that with the gold, copper price up, things can look up in Canada, Australia and USA junior explorers. Sun 31.3.24. Not editing as going to have tea next, after lunch.

Thank you for the clarification of what is happening. Why? It has so "wound" folks up that the "PERSONAL ADDRESS" of Mr Bell, Chairman was published on a public forum ie this. This is against this site's rules and for a good reason that I dont need to explain as it is obvious. This has LED to mention that he [another poster] is surprised no one has.....Mr Bell? This is PROOF that NOT EVERYONE can see the trees from the leaves kinda of thing. Another on Twitter, tweeted to the "POLICE."? For what? It is a KNOWN FACT that everyone is aware of ie COURTS go through due process and they are NOT kangaroo courts. Hence, why I asked WHAT IS THE OBJECTIVE of this 1 NON-SHAREHOLDER "OVERSIGHT" that is "UNOFFICIAL". A lot has been published of Mr Bell - his office which is in FACT, the SMALLEST ROOM in the serviced building. Presumably, Mr Bell was working from home which is much cheaper but now that the address has been PUBLICY PUBLISHED on a public forum here, it is no longer possible. This would have saved quite a bit of expense for RRR. I would prefer a RRR RNS REACH to just get an update, rather than NO RNS at all. Everyone on other forums GRUMBLE re: NO RNS. So, this has gone on for months on end. In the past, I just gave up when I came to this forum. Hence, I have appreciated some details from those who know a bit more about the RRR projects. Just to research 1 project takes weeks and weeks. Not editing as ready for lunch. Sun, 31.3.24.

END OF DAY QUESTION: What is the OBJECTIVE of the "NON-OFFICIAL" "OVER-SIGHT" by a non-shareholder of RRR?

Sun, 31 MAR 2024.

Contd:

"DIS-SATISFACTION": Both on this forum and on the other RRR forum, RRR's AGM, 16 Feb 2024 was commented on relating to "VOTING" done "BY SHOW OF HANDS". Company Law , Section 107 Show of Hands Voting - if a poster is "not satisfied", then , he or she should ATTEND IN PERSON , IF, they want to witness in person. On Twitter, one chap said he attended with his young son. So, should be mentioned because it is going on and on ---so "unofficial" "oversight" by another means that RRR must do things X, Y, Z wants IRRESPECTIVE CO COMPANY LAW THAT GOVERNS MEETINGS, AGMS ETC?

"UNOFFICIAL OVERSIGHT"- I note that one got so "upset" or "wound up" that he said that he is surprised X,Y,Z about Mr Andrew Bell, Chairman of RRR? This was recent. It is of concern and hence, today, this conversation must be that FACTS are set out and that the RRR RNS, "1/2 year report" of Thur, 28 Mar 2024 appears to have D I S - P R O V E D points raised of UNDECLARED LOANS [NONE FOUND BY THE "UNOFFICIAL" "OVER-SIGHT" [1] or RRR AGM, 16.2.24 RESOLUTION 4 PASSED OF AUTHORITY TO APPROVE but NO ISSUANCE.

QUESTION FOR RRR: What if this continues "unabated" without the normal CHECKS AND BALANCES? I often read other stock forums on this site but so far, NOTHING like on this forum by a NON-SHAREHOLDER. In a hedge fund report on short-selling, it is said that 1 type of posting is by those who have something against the co? So, this is known theory and included in short-selling. Anyone who does HOLD SHARES IN A CO would ask and discuss and clarify but those who have a short-seller's mindset would only go 1 direction against the co, head etc. ? Maybe, it should be in a different class but hedge funds in America lump it together as the interpretation of events of any co are skewed? IS IT HEALTHY? Yes, No. What if it affect's one $$$? Question to be asked? Yes, No? Sun, 31.3.24.

"UNOFFICIAL"" OVERSIGHT"?: One notes that there is "unofficial" "oversight" on this forum? This appears most "unusual" [not usual] in that every dot is examined and interpreted on an open forum here. So, let's examine some of the main so-called "objections": [1] REACH RNS vs RNS-On reflection, it is my personal view, that REACH RNS could be appropriate for two updates on RRR DRC litigation. Why? From Helpful, the poster, there are now new MAR regulations. Having read the RRR 1/2 YEAR REPORT DATED THUR, 28 MAR 2024, the DRC "legal action" is set out in its ENTIRETY and NOTHING has been left out ie backdrop to-date. Even RRR Zimbabwe has been stated CLEARLY and in print.

[2] LOANS NOT "DECLARED" BUT MAY SHOW UP IN THE ACCOUNTS: RRR 1/2 year report out on 28 Mar 2024 and the "UNOFFICIAL" "OVERSIGHT" [1] is SILENT ie no comment on FINDING anything.

[3] RRR AGM, 16 FEB 2024: RESOLUTION 4: "AUTHORITY TO ISSUE"- A lot of hoo ha but to date , N O I S S U A N C E.

Any holder of RRR would now be in a position to see clearly that "unofficial" "oversight" by 1 NON-SHAREHOLDER, leading to ....by naysayers have now BEEN PROVEN NOT FACT? Therefore, THE "UNOFFICIAL OVER-SIGHT COURT" has not made a CASE but in fact the RRR RNS NOMAD APPROVED has countered definitively the status of RRR projects etc. POSTING FOR BALANCE. In the past, if I comment, I am called names , of which this site does not allow by the "unofficial" "oversight" [1] but it is not advantageous if there is only 1 without BALANCE and this appears now proven correct. Effect: Yes, IF ONE HOLDS SHARES IN RRR, it appears to be of interest in that it could appear to be "material" to one's own position in RRR. Yes, No? Sun, 31 Mar 2024 NIA, DYOR.

Tis. Obvious to holders isnt it? Its from the RRR RNS, 28.3.24 ["1/2 yr results]. But DO naysayers know? Do they read RNS's from RRR?

KAMOA-KAKULA, DRC of Robert Friedland legendary fame: Just checked: "Thickness from 2.3m to 15.8m [for Indicated Mineral Resources]. Deposit has been tested from BELOW SURFACE to 1 5 6 0m and open to the east and south."

RRR MUSONI, DRC - Superpit. A. Bell, Chairman of RRR in the interview via the link said he would bet his "life on it" ie Musoni. It was given to RRR without anyone realising THEN, that the mineralisation as always goes DEEPER. That is how it fell into RRR's hands. Same with LUMBASHI [RRR has 80% stake in the JV with Galaxy] - hence why I asked Helpful about the deeper depths since it is not that far from all the copper projects/district etc. Sat, 30 Mar 2024.

What is MR BELL WORKING ON ie On/Off this long holiday ie Fri & Mon, Public Holidays? Sat, 30.3.24.

Andrew Bell, Chairman, RRR: "Here, we are on HOLIDAY.....IN DRC & BURKINA MY COLLEAGUES ===CONTINUE==WORKING..." - Thur, 28 Mar 2024 tweet by A.Bell.

DRC is made up of 95% of 1/2 RC & 1/2 Protestants etc. So, would be a HOLIDAY in the DRC? Question: Why are RRR DRC staff still working this Good Fri and Easter Mon public holidays? Mr Bell is also on OFF/ON this public hols? Working on?????? Sat, 30 Mar 2024.