Member Info for Nanogeddon

Perhaps now that the company has fked the share price on the downside they might like to post another RNS to bring some balance?

It's hard to provide a balanced view to shareholders publicly whilst at the same communicate a fight to Samsung. Maybe BT's fighting talk got our hopes up to some degree for an outcome that wasn't as achievable as it sounded.

Yes ... the market certainly appears to have changed it's mind... it's funny how some people think that the market is always right. LOL

If they had lost the case their jobs would be in jeopardy, and would leave them with a difficult time explaining at their next interview.

Multiple personality disorder.

Totally agree Lobo. Incentives should be predominantly be in share options.

Good point Gigawitt... can you remember apporximately the range of outcomes discussed on this board over last weekend (to save me re-reading 1000 posts)

Thanks ScreenLearner... Good points. That gives me some comfort.

Is it possible that this settlement only allows Samsung to use the tech in TVs, and that any other type of display would be disallowed under the terms of the settlement?

I'm not trolling. I'm just hoping someone can convince me that is not the case.

Hawi, all patents that are confirmed now have zero potential for future income for Nanoco.

Other patents are not confirmed and may be used on a 'use now pay at discount later' basis by ST Micro for example.

That's my worry.

Not rude then... Brash LOL

We were at 9p when there was no sign of a legal funder, no sign of a litigation, our display business had been stolen and we were more loss making than we are now. At that time 9p represented the hopes of a still distant commercial contract.

Commercialisation is probably imminent with a long term plan from the European partner who has invested a lot in not only the first generation of the product but the 2nd generation also.
We have more clients showing more interest.
Our cost base is lower now.
We have cash runway to 2025 and with some money from this settlement we have financial security for longer.
The value of our potential commercialisation therefore represents considerably more than 9p of the current share price.
Even if that value is only 20p, anything over £60m for the settlement will raise the share price above 40p.

Nanoco surely have to walk away with something in excess of £50m (I hop3 more!). How else could BT make the claim that we can defend our IP through litigation in future. We would not have the means to do so.
Obviously I don’t know though.

Are you saying that HL have a fund that is holding a large % of Nanoco? Excuse my ignorance.

HL isn't a holder. It's the PI's their platform.

Very much so. I would like to keep it that way. 26p average.
I'm holding because I don't like trying to trade this - it's too stressful.

Any words from the wise long term holders? I know who you are! :)
This cannot any longer be put down to balancing their portfolio, since the price is falling. They must have sold some yesterday at around 40p so they can't be expecting much more than that post settlement news?
Sorry for the bad vibes. I have a big stake here.

Have we forgotten about this? So many posts about how the appeals could have gone on for years. The RNS said the same.

No! Samsung was under threat of a block on sale in the first have of next year. And they still are if this happens (hopefully) to go to court.

Ok. Brash.