Member Info for Nanogeddon

*who subsequently was able to communicate to the market

Further more, NGR, Samsung already knew the approximate pittance that Nanoco would settle for. Nanoco allowed someone onto the BoD who had communicated to the market via LOAM the level that Nanoco's BoD were willing to sell out for.

Any sum that was commercially viable, NGR - in order to avoid an injunction in Germany.

You obviously don't understand shares Gig. A buyer of an existing share, who then benefits from a subsequent increase in the share price does not receive anything at the expense of other shareholders other than from the shareowner who chose to sell them the share. If they buy shares issued in a fund raise, then it is the board of directors who have caused any loss to the existing shareholders, through dilution.

Just stop talking, there's a good chap.

"HH what’s wrong with the 1000% figure?"
Did you forget to sign out and sign into Gig account?

"The problem here is greed. The average return on shares is about 7% per annum but posters here are indignant when they don’t earn 1000% in a few months."
Uh Uh. Wrong again. Posters here are indignant that BT said there would be huge return in a few months.

Absolutely right Troublesome. He is a narcissist.

Various posts from Gig... nothing worth reading... Usual crap probably...

Feeks, that is extreme. With a 47% rate of tax and NI it would take years to save 500k even on his salary.

When your pay goes up, you generally have extra money, unless you are no good at managing money.

BT got a nice big pay rise this year. If I was earning 500k a year, and knew of a really good company to invest in, I would would get me some o those shares.

"@Nanogeddon: And the really sad fact is that we already have big commercialisation with Samsung it is just that Samsung got away with murder despite assurances by BT that this would not be the case."
Oh come on now Henry... didn't you read the 9 Jan RNS? LOL

In reality the company is in a much more secure position than it has ever been. That sounds good.
The reality is that also that the company now appears to be in a much worse position that BT had told us it was in.
BT has let everyone down because of his hype, and now no one is going to believe in this company until a commercial contract comes in. He might be right, but I now take everything he has said with a pinch of salt.
The market clearly has zero confidence of large commercialisation, or a modest level of confidence some very small commercialisation.

"HH did you read the Edison note?"
GigWitt = NGR. Same nonsense argument that misses the point.

Oh wow NGR... so soon after GigWitty posted...
You are the same person after all.

"You forgot about when I worked as an undercover journalist and political reporter. For BBC one."

That explains a lot. The worst fcking liars in this country, after the government who dictate their narative.

That's why every other post is yours.

I'm out for a while and hopefully you will shut up also.

Oh no! PLEASE DONT GO! I will stop posting if you stay!
You are all leaving except Nig. This is exactly what he wanted - to dominate the board with an unbalanced view.

Mr

Why didn't you sell on the 9 Jan Kr Know it all? You could have sold in the morning and you would have way more shares by now!