Member Info for Nanogeddon

Maybe the BoD want to keep the share price low whilst they agree promotions at ST Micro as part of a takeover? I've seen that before.

"The continuing silence of the BOD is debilitating"... Sadly Peregrinetrouser, it doesn't matter what BT has to say now.
Nothing will bring back confidence in this share except a commercial order. Nothing.
I hold because I think that an order will move the share price hugely if it is worth more than say £5m... but a part of me does wonder whether BT is just scamming us again.

For the record I am still holding almost all my shares, for the time being.

"If he was down beat, do you think that he would have got a term sheet arrangement at all."
Not relevant Tornadotony. Samsung had to weigh what they would have lost if they continued.
The fact is that BT and the BoD knew what they were willing to settle for. They had decided in their board room as part of their strategy. Add to that the fact that Samsung would have eventually had to settle, and you can conclude with absolute certainty that this share was never going to be worth as much as 37p based on the litigation outcome. Only a commercial order could put the share price above 37p.
So how can they be excused for fund raising at 37p. The fund raise price hasn't affected me, nor has the 6 Jan misleading RNS, because I didn't buy during those periods and my average is a lot less than 37p. BUT STILL the behaviour of BT has been inexcusable. Ramping the potential, when he knew that LOAM knew the real value was much lower.

He will no doubt tell us that appeals would have gone on for years, and he will no doubt have forgotten that they had a potential injunction coming up in Germany later this year.
So lets keep reminding the shareholders, in order that he doesn't feel that he can so easily pull the wool over their eyes.

You may be right about the awful stock, coolnames. An understandable point of view after the disaster that some shareholders have suffered due to BT's litigation ramping.
I don't see much ramping anymore though.
LOAM called it pretty accurately (understandably LOL) when they were selling down to 33p... and since they are holding now they must see some value at this level.
Possibly worth a put now.

So... The Samsung settlement was agreed and signed before 3 Feb...

Letters should have gone out to some suspected infringers in the week commencing 6 Feb...

Deal negotiations should take a few weeks, or if infringer is uncooperative then we should expect an RNS announcing litigation.

4-8 weeks? Am I being too ambitious?

So often we investors try to predict the ups and downs of the markets... hoping to time it just right and sell at the top or to scoop from the bottom of a dip.
Never has there been a better opportunity to scoop big on the lowest possible price that a share can reach.
Get your Nanocos.
:D

Very attractive to investors... They are coming in their droves :D

“ In the first half, we have continued to build on the significant positive momentum achieved in the last few years, positioning ourselves for significant organic growth in the near term”
"POSITIONING OURSELVES FOR"

GigWitt, you expect 99% of people to argue with your post because 1) about 1% of your posts ever have anyone agree with them other than your other profiles, and 2) your message is idiotic.

Nanageddon is a character on the Mighty Boosh. Read no more into it :)

Tornado, I'm not sure you can split this pay-out into future income and apply ratios to get a valuation in the normal way. The idea of applying ratios to value the company is based on the assumption of continued payments for the long time and also an assumption of growth in the sector.
If any investor interprets 'deferred profit' as ongoing profit in the real sense, simply because it has been accounted for in that way then I think they would have misinterpreted or been misled.

Henry, I completely sympathise with your view. I imagine you are probably frustrated partly because this continues to fall and you want a rise for your exit.
I think we need a reality check here. BT leaving won't bring the share back. Nothing will except a commercial order.
There is no way that the market is going to trust this company again after it's 3 major false dawns over 20 years.
This company is going to languish between 24p and 26p until and order comes in or until Sterling drops enough to raise the £value of our cash that's due.
For the sake of your health I think you have to accept the loss and decide from here whether you believe it's worth a punt for a commercial order. LOAM seems to believe it's worth a punt. They don't appear to be selling over the past 3 weeks - or at least not with any speed.
If we get a commercial order (I assign a lowish probability) then this could easily be worth double from this point. Every £1m of income should put 5p on the share price.

Do we have an nano experts left?

Where's Nanonano when we need him? Nanu Nanu!

Our core IP protects (from all but Samsung) the method of mass producing CFQDs.
Does anyone know how many other types of products require mass production of CFQDs, and will therefore require our IP.

I think that BT said the patents protecting the sensing tech were different from the ones in the litigation.

OK... so on a brighter note... our core IP protects (from all but Samsung) the method of mass producing CFQDs.
Does anyone know how many other types of products require mass production of CFQDs, and will therefore require our IP.

I think that BT said the patents protecting the sensing tech were different from the ones in the litigation.

Sorry BeContrarian... I will try to refrain.
It is hard to stand by and just listen when someone is continually extolling the great achievements of Nanoco's BoD when they have so clearly misled everyone. It is so unbalanced.
I shall disappear into my shell for a few days.

How do you play hardball when you have an injunction on your TVs and your customer's (Sony) TVs in Germany?