Member Info for Nanogeddon

I thought I did, but Brian Tenner corrected me.

Why is this piece of crap rising now? Feels like I'm staring in the Truman Show.

Don't tamper with Brian's car. That would be disgusting.

I know Nanoco isn't AIM. Monetise was, and the directors were crooks.

Thanks Feeks. I swore I would never invest in AIM again... but I'm here. Good luck!

"CEO can be trusted. He laid out the risks that the company avoided rather than pursuing a riskier outcome. Bravo."
He laid out the risks long after he had people to buy at an over-inflated price that he had himself inflated, and after they had lost their money.

"Selling!?! You should be buying buddy"
I'm done. I might buy a few when the price has fallen more. No rush here.
I'm enjoying my new Saietta shares... Nice rise at the moment. Haven't felt this good since 8th Jan.

...trying to make it look like they buy based on public news now...

I was having FOMO Wednesday and FOMO Thursday.

"Was wondering if anyone had added here since reading the recent RNS and Edison report."
No... been selling. My only regret is that I won't have as much voting power to oust the BT.

It's interesting that the price tanked so much just prior to the announcement of collaboration with AVTEC. Why was that?

A small amount at 50p... and then at 21p... and a lot over the past 3 days... I'm hoping this isn't just me driving the share price :D
... but I won't trigger an RNS...

Absolutely! Get your dots cheap with Nanoco. Buy one in 5 years get 500 free now, and we'll for evert $1 you spend in 5 years we'll throw in $0.57 worth of free patents.
Roll up! Roll up! Come and get it!

Hey Feeks... thank you for the recommendation... I don't have much of a clue about this yet and was trusting your judgment, given that you have been well informed in the past.
I'm pleased to see this rising now.

BT did not become aware of the risked outcome models (or the settlement that Nanoco's BoD would be willing to accept) the night before he settled (6 Jan). The BoD of Nanoco had strategised for months prior to going to court... they had strategised prior to the planned 12 Sept court case... prior to Henry Turcan leaving the board... Prior to Turcan selling LOAM shares (with his knowledge of the strategy)... and prior to BT telling us all (FOR MONTHS) different story to the one we are now hearing.

BT is a liar. He has misled shareholders. He has misled new shareholders and long-term shareholders such as myself. Fortunately for me, I did not lose too much because I bought in a long time ago. For as long as I remain a shareholder I will be in this chat room, and I will not let newcomers be duped by BT, NGR or anyone else.

"Did you miss the bits about three outcomes with nil reward to Nanoco or can you still only see what Edison ‘told’ you? Muppets"
Every time you spout **** NGR I will repeat that the issue is that the CEO of the company was telling a very different story to what he knew to be true over the past year or more.
BT mislead people.
Want to brush it under the carpet? Then stop prompting the need for others to correct you.

"I didn't even do it myself when the share reached 60p, that would have been the most sensible thing to do."
Don't be so hard on yourself GA. You were lied to. No-one in their right mind would have sold at 60p based on what BT had told us about the settlement criteria. My friend sold at 70p, but that was because he hadn't researched all BT's hype and lies.
And no, I won't take it offline. Thank you. You can go to another chat group if you wish.

"HH given your myopic view and hope for a short term gain..."
Interesting that you presume to know people's hopes NGR. Very very similar to GigWitty.

"Unfortunately as it is one has to treat this company as a new start this year, and BT is right what an incredible platform to start again on."
Yes... like a fresh start with an abusive partner.
There's a reason that II's haven't gone near this. A preferential deal needed to be made with LOAM to get them on board, and when it was done, they dumped.

I didn't say he was NigWit.