Member Info for Nanogeddon

Sorry ddubya - I wasn't trying to correct the general point you were making.
I just don't like seeing the 'patent validity has been proven' concept being repeated on here. I think it's misleading to newcomers.

"...now that patent validity is secure..."
Patent validity is another misleading concept. The patents that have been tested in court can no longer provide any significant income. Their potential has been given away to Samsung.
The other patents are not tested.
Let's stop kidding ourselves by repeating BT's nonsense.

Can we just agree no more pay rises for this useless BoD until they show us some profit from commercialisation. They are overpaid as it is.

The relentless selling is disillusioned shareholders trying to get out, but no one really wants the shares.
Lot's of excitement today though by the look of the share price... No doubt trepidation for what BT might have to say on Tuesday.

Absolutely. Announced on 12 September to be precise.
And the original court case was due to start on 12 September... well.... that gave Turcan enough time to find out what the BoD were willing to accept as a settlement from Samsung.

Don't start thinking for yourself whatever you do. Coward.

Climate change denier? Don't forget that one.

You've been watching the BBC too much... learning all the names you need to control people's views.

"Just hope the next RNS is not full of weasel words, empty rhetoric and ambiguities with dangling carrots and spoonfuls of jam to be delivered"
Can you remember a time when we were given anything else?

...but on a more positive note, my new Tesla shares are doing quite well today. I wish I had bought them before.

Yeah - we already know about the £35m and it's already priced into the share price. That's why the share price remains firmly where it is now.

However, I'm sorry to correct/disappoint you. The first instalment is $75m and the legal fees will be paid out of it, leaving $15m... which equates to about £12m.

Next year there will be another $75m and we keep all of it... but the market knows about that one too and it's already reflected in the share price. That's why the share price is and will remain firmly where it is... with a gentle drift downwards, until we see some money coming through the door from a commercial contract.

No. I will sell down as I please.
And I will post as I please.

There is no update next week that will move the share price. If Nanoco had anything firm that would affect the share price then they would have to announce it by RNS.
Anything else that BT has to say is of zero value. It should be taken with a pinch of salt.

Really? I hope you are right. It's 6.4 weeks... and more because BT claimed he had written to companies last year.
How long does it take to sound out whether they are going to co-operate or announce litigation?

More than 6 weeks since the abysmal settlement was announced.
No RNS for orders.
No RNS for litigation against all those that BT was SO SURE were infringing. What a farce.
Time to start selling down I think.

"In that case I would refer you back to what has been said in earlier updates about companies wanting a second line of supply for production..."
Thanks Nanonano. If you're right that sounds positive does it not? Are you suggesting that Nanoco can't supply ST's demand level, or that they need a backup for contingency?

I'm excited too. STM surely won't be able to resist Nanoco's new Buy One in 5 Years Get 100 Free Now deal. It's a no Brianer for them.

Baznick, I hope you have complained to the FCA.

I'm afraid not. If there was any significant news that could affect the share price then it would have been released in an RNS.

"Samsung are not a charity supporting British PI’s".
What a stupid remark. They were a defendant and subject to the Texas court.