Member Info for MrJinx

Not the news I was hoping for as it means we’re no further forward than where we were 6 months ago. However, this is very positive as we’re now working collaboratively with guys that actually know what they’re doing, technically wise.
Any ideas floating on the cost/equity/split/terms of this deal?

OMG guys, get a room already, sheesh!!!

@legalwolf, the sad thing is that this same board (now minus Bottomley) fund raised £15m for ‘new ventures’ seven years ago and then delivered zilch, squat, na-da!
I’m starting to feel an intense sense of déjà vu

...my celebration emoji??? Booooom! :)

I wasn’t disagreeing with the plans to raise. I was objecting to the term ‘wouldn’t begrudge’ a 6p raise. Are you still standing by that?
If could only eat dog s**t but I was offered it with sugar, it’s better than plain old dog s**t, but it’s still dog s**t. A raise at 6p, although not 4.5p, is still....yup, dog s**t.
All in my humble opinion, of course.

You wouldn’t ‘begrudge’ a raising at 6p??? We have Emmerson people telling everyone who’ll listen that they don’t know why the share price is still low, yet you’d be happy if they then went and valued a portion of the company at 6p? 6p????
Begeezus, this investing lark really is a madhouse!

Nigeria is the largest oil producer in Africa. It holds the largest natural gas reserves on the continent and was the world's fifth–largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in 2018.
So why is a pipeline between the two countries worth a mention? If anything, it means Morocco buying it’s gas from Nigeria...not the other way round.

Considering the huge sell off across the board, it’s holding up nicely here. My PF is a sea of red today and being just two per cent down on the day so far, EML is one of my better performers.

Big things expected from EML in 2021. Obviously, do your own research.

You don’t go to Investment Shows if you’re already financially sorted.

Shareholder, not wanting to carry forward our discussion from yesterday but the ‘feasibility’ study that Chariot have conducted in-house, as far as I understand it, falls short of what is considered industry standard, for the development of a fully functioning, producing well;
Oil & Gas Feasibility Studies typically involve: Establishing scope, objectives and terms of reference for the study
Developing a study basis including oil & gas development data, well site PVT data analysis, etc. Review of subsurface exploration results, Performance of geology, reservoir engineering and production engineering, consideration of EOR techniques, e.g.: water injection, steam injection, gas lift etc, establishment of base drainage scenarios and production profiles, performance of development engineering, production o facilities definition and separation facilities definition, HSE screening, oil and gas risk assessment, development schedule, CAPEX, OPEX and oil and gas economics. (Cut & paste, courtesy of another chat room)
I think we’d all agree, more work needs to be done. On the flip side, Chariot have taken a dormant uneconomical discovery and made it marketable. It’s certainly not the dogs dinner that Shedlife, Simon et al are crusading.

I wish people would stop taking my posts out of context. It stifles healthy debate.

All cool. :0)

I have made an error though. You threatened to sue that Simon chap, not Shedlife. Apologies to all involved. :)

“I think it will be in place, you don’t seem to think so , yet you still hold on here ...you have a choice if you don’t believe what the company are saying or doing.”
Where have I said or intimidated that...?
Did you even read my post or did you peruse it and jump to a conclusion?
My post was related to the discussion at the time regarding lending. Not once did I say Chariot wouldn’t get funding. I merely highlighted that there wouldn’t be investment without ‘robust economic modelling’. To use your phrase, it’s quite simple really.
Re: your apology, it’s appreciated but there really is no need. You should read the ****e sent to me on football forums. It makes LSE boards read like a Pulitzer Prize winning novel.

Shareholder, you still haven’t specified what it was about my post that was negative about Chariot, or indeed why I should have put ‘IMO’.
The three main tenets of the original post, which uncannily got deleted were:
1. No investment firm will lend without seeing robust economic modelling
2. Chariot has yet to publish an Environmental Impact study.
2a Chariot has yet to publish a full feasibility study.
3. Chariot can still achieve a farm out, without the above being in place.
Tell me how they’re either lies, untruths or exaggerated somehow? In fact, tell me how they’re negative and critical of Chariot.
I find all this rather perplexing. I’ve been on this board years. I’ve been on this board at times where the only people posting has been me, Growler, Gooner and Precious. There have been weeks that not a single post has been made except ours. We’ve ridden this ride to where we thought we’d be rich, right down to 1.67p a share. What ever I have posted has merit whether positive or negative. The fact that whatever I’ve said has always come to pass seems forgotten on you ‘new’ fella’s.
It should also be noted that since the board sacked Bottomley, I have posted nothing that may be classed as negative. Even this last three weeks when the most tremendous rubbish has been posted, I’ve said nothing. Does that sound like someone trying to derail a recovery?
Your issue appears to be that you want to censor grown up debate as you’d like to live in your own echo chamber where only your version of events is credible. As it happens, I think Shedlife, or whatever his name is, is an irritant but he shouldn’t be threatened with being sued. That’s just plum crazy talk. Regarding hiding behind avatars, you’re absolutely right. However, they get sued because they actually name someone or something that’s recognisable in real life. An anonymous avatar ‘defaming’ another anonymous avatar just doesn’t exist. How can it?
All this in my very own opinion.

Like you’d sue anybody off a bulletin board... :D) I’ve read some complete ****e on here over the last three weeks but crikey, this takes the prize.
You do realise that you’d need to prove defamation of character? How would you do that when Shareholderchar is a pretend title that allows anonymity. I’m sure I don’t need to tell you that pretend people can’t sue...Unless of course you can prove a value to ‘Shareholderchar’ and a link to your real self. I’m surprised your huge legal team didn’t tell you this before you threatened legal action.

Now there’s a surprise.

...this is unloved.

*Snott; Did I f***!!! Watched crestfallen as £52k @ 20p slump down to just over £4k @ 1.8p and resigned myself to losing that too. I’m not sure we’ll get back to 20p until a partner has been signed up but I’m certainly happier today than yesterday :)
Maybe we’ll get to have our ‘Pound Party’ after all....