Member Info for MrJinx

Marine, not sure why you’re even responding. You’re not worth the flakey skin on my ball bag. At least SHC has merit in his position...sometimes. :D)

Again SHC, in your efforts to unnecessarily pour scourn on any others views but your own, you’ve blatantly misread my post to promote it as negativity.
A few facts for you.
1. Natural Gas is a fossil fuel. You can spin whatever ****e you like about that, I don’t care.
2. There is a movement away from fossil fuel investment amongst nearly all the main managed investment vehicles and banks. It’s in the papers nearly everyday ffs. That’s not to say there is no investment in fossil fuel exploration, just less appetite for it.
3. I have not posted ANYTHING TODAY, that is negative. I even hoped for ‘large investors that aren’t shy of investing in fossil fuels’. How on gods green earth is that negative? To counter with ‘oh, well natural gas isn’t a fossil fuel’ is absolutely absurd.
I get why you’re all defensive though, what with all the money you’ve got tied up in here. I mentioned him before but Wheepo (god bless him!) was the same. However, he had also convinced his relatives to invest too. You could virtually witness his mental unwinding as his position started to unravel.
Which is why I don’t get your volatility. I agree with you that things are on the up. So you need to find other ‘enemies’ to focus on though fella as you’re wasting effort trying to paint me as such,
*let me just remember what you wrote ‘Natural Gas isn’t a fossil fuel’. Oh my...hahahaha! :D

OMG!!! I swear SHC, if you were alone in a room, you’d fall out with yourself.
Natural Gas, albeit cleaner than coal and oil, is still a fossil fuel. Denying that, makes you look a bit stupid. As a fossil fuel, rightly or wrongly, means there’s less appetite for investing from pension funds, investment managers and banks. That’s the way of the world now my friend.
I also think that’s the key reason Chariot are moving into renewables, to increase our ‘green credentials’ to possible investors. This last point is obviously imho.

I’ve gotta say, even as a negative nelly, I’m surprised at fall back into the 5’s so quickly. The sp has seemingly bounced of 5.7 ish so let’s see what happens.
SHC, you must have balls the size of melons. 290k on a dropping sp? Don’t you know about not trying to catch falling knives? :)
One person alone, isn’t going to keep Chariot buoyant. We need a few big buyers who haven’t been scared off investing in fossil fuels.

My apologies. Was getting mixed up with a different company I’m invested with. Anyway, £5.5m makes my question more pertinent.

I’d be intrigued to know how much money Emmerson have left of the 10m raise. With all these tweets about employees that are being paid, and on-going development work which the raise was for, I wonder the cost of the contingency safety buffer and the time span. I’d be shocked if we’d burnt through even half the cash raised, but I’m also sure they didn’t anticipate the environmental permit still hasn’t been sorted, approaching the start of Q4.

Lol....You said I called you names. :D The twisted truth isn’t truth, y’know.

You accused me of name calling. When did I do that?

That’s it Stu, thanks!
Wow...just wow!!!!

I’m sure I read somewhere recently that due to current potash prices, the NAV of Khemisset is $3.5bn and capex could be repaid within 12mths?
If true, that is astounding by any measure. There are oil and gas explorers that would kill for those numbers.

Too right Goon, he certainly is amongst us. Even the mention of his name rattles a few cages. :)

@Marine. My losses are growing???? Lol, you’re just a defensive clichè but thanks for your input. :D)
@Speculiar. Never seen or read anything from you before. I can see why :’oD
@SHC. That’s a fair post and agree with all of it.

SHC...I’m only responding to Marine dismissing the value in having a farm-in partner and the value they see in our acreage after their due diligence. That’s vastly different to paying a consultancy firm to agree with the in-house assessment. You know it, I know it and I’m sure everyone else knows it.
I see you’re peddling the old ‘Jinx has an agenda’ bs. Still can’t accept that we were right to offer caution against your unconscionable ramps, can you. As I said before, I stopped posting as I keep repeating myself over and over. I’ve not been proven wrong at any stage and good grief, I even agreed with your last assessment of having a good wind behind us.

Netherland and Sewell? Huh....this is the same paid consultants that have agreed with Chariot on ALL the previous failed drills. C’mon Marine, you can’t be this naive, surely?

@Marine...you’re kidding me right? You’re using letters of interest as third party verification??? Really??????? Good grief.

@marineclark. Your post would seem logical in what would be seen as an ideal scenario. However, Anchois was previously discarded as not commercially viable by the actual discoverers. Since then obviously, exploration and extraction technology has moved on. However, since Chariot was awarded the license, the only scientific affirmation declared about Anchois has been by our very own in-house geology team and paid for consultants. Having a farm-in partner provides third party verification whereby they too are prepared to risk their own cash. So yes, it dilutes what is there but gives us more security. In my opinion anywho.

Good to be back. I read the board daily and it’s good to see there’s now a general parity of positivity and restraint.
Bad result for your lads today. We have United tomorrow so we’ll be with you on nil points come tomorrow night. Not good...

Hahaha :D, sorry Goon! :D

There, I said it...
Remember when he used to know the availability and global positioning of every drill ship within a thousand miles. Just by their movements, he was able to identify the most likely vessel that would be used to drill our sites. At the moment, I feel as investors, we’re flying a little blind. I appreciate I can be a bit impatient at times but feel if we’re to drill this year, an agreement needs to be in place before the end of September. The silence from Chariot is always deafening and as I’ve said before, it makes my anus twitch. A little bit like the proverbial canary in the mine, sort of thing.
I don’t post very often now as I feel I just keep repeating myself over and over and over again. I do read the board though and I’d just like to pick up on something SHC wrote. In summary, he basically stated that he was blind-sided by the fund raise. Of course he was, as were we all. However, myself, Gooner, Growler, bardotbeat and a few others, often cautioned against the effects of ‘cheerleading’ Chariot from the likes of SHC. We didn’t caution because we wanted Chariot to fail, we cautioned people to make them aware of what the Chariot board are capable of. Financially, they would gladly take p.I’d out at the knees.
Knowing what you know now SHC, do you now accept we knew what we were talking about?
I’m not surprised the s.p is currently falling. I was more surprised it held up for so long and even touched 7p, after the raise. I’m with SHC now though, I think after all that’s been said and done, there surely can only be blue sky from here on in. They have cash, they’ve committed to the drill and the gas is there. I’m not necessarily as confident on the drill results though. There’s reasons Anchois was abandoned and would really love independent third party verification in the form of a farm-in. If we don’t get that, we’re in the hands of our in-house geology team and that makes my arse twitch like a bunny’s nose!!!!!

Thanks Westie. :)