Member Info for MrJinx

Positive thoughts, Goon. Positive thoughts…! :)

Not a bad post that OOSM…for you! ;)

After living through previous platings at massive discounts, I’m pleasantly surprised this placing is at current sp. I’m choked at yet another raise but that’s a fact of life investing in explorers.

It’s not ‘good’ news, it’s just ‘news’. If you think raising cash whilst the s.p is in single digits, for a project in the billions, then you’re easily pleased. Haydn and Graham have consistently told us they know no reason why the s.p isn’t higher at 15p plus. Well lads and lasses, this is the reason why. They previously raised at sub 5p, now it’s 6p, then up to 8p…..8p ffs!!!!
If the BoD’s only values this project at this stage, in single digits, why would anyone else think differently.
There’s also an extra element of caution here. A company comes in, lends money for equity and slowly but surely they lend a bit more, then a bit more, they then own in excess of 51%, oust the BoDs and fund raise into any rise in the sp. It happens a lot my fellow shareholders so be wary.

Now we know why the s.p has been stuck around these levels.

Back in the black! :0)

You’re quite the odious individual aren’t you fella. Don’t think until now, I’ve been disrespectful to you. You seem to want to read words like possibly and could be or could have, and understand them as certainties. You write as if you’re trying to portray some kind of special intellect, but you’re a loon.

You obviously weren’t posting on this board when GC was appointed. There were many posts questioning his appointment. I wasn’t one of them. The fact that you dismiss any POV which isn’t your own leads me to believe you’re not worth having a debate with, sadly.

I’ve tried engaging with you but you left me wondering whether or not you being purposely obtuse?
Where did I blame GC for Sirius?
Read my posts, take five minutes, absorb the context, then reply.

@OOSM; I answered the question you asked.
Regarding increased exposure from doing PR gigs, which is the question you should’ve asked, it can only be a good thing. The issue all CEO’s have when they do these interviews is how high is their credibility. Although EML is far removed from the situation Sirius found itself in, investing in potash projects took a hiding and unfortunately GC was possibly tarnished along with the project. A lot of people lost money and sometimes it’s a case of once bitten, twice shy. Then you couple together the delay in the ESIA which was denied by GC, but then we found out otherwise, it doesn’t paint him in a good light. It’s unfortunate but there we go. It’s happened and now we move forward.

Wow! You have some weird issues my friend. If I can help, I will help…you see, I’m a giving person.
So, to answer your question; ‘…do I believe that it is a good thing that GC and Hayden are once again being invited to speak out on the progress that has been made by Emmerson?’

If you don’t mind me being blunt but that’s a really strange question. Why would being ‘invited’ to speak on Zak Mir’s podcast be any validation of future benefits to investors? I don’t specifically mean EML but any company. AIM is littered with failing companies that have had CEO’s interviewed by Zak Mir.

I’m just waiting for the first numb-skull to say it’s because we ‘got our entry price’ and now we’re invested. There’s always one…. :0D

Chisler, I think the universe has twisted itself in knots. Up is down, left is right, night is now day and negative is now positive. Who’da thunk it?????

I would never describe myself as a lazy reader OOSM, but crikey old Riley, I hope you’re more interesting than this in real life. I should feel flattered that you went through the trouble of going through my previous posts, but instead I feel a bit icky. That feeling where you look out of a bedroom window at night and think someone is in the bushes, watching, waiting, lurking….!

A few more daily 8%’ers between now and permit approval would be more than welcome. :)

Again, you’re missing the point. My issue is not with negativity or positivity but posters attempting to shut down debate. Nothing more, nothing less.

@Chisler, that was going to be my first question. :0)
@OOSM, I have positivity. I wouldn’t still be here if I didn’t. However, one thing above all else gets my goat is posters that start slinging rhetoric and silly insults to demean other posters, just because they have a different point of view. Especially if it’s being done by posters who have previously been shown to be wrong. So, my issue wasn’t with the future of EML, my issue was with Westie and others promoting the latest PR interview as if it was a prophecy from God, and then slating people as doom mongers or rumour mongers for raising any questions.
As for me thinking it was me who was being called a doom monger, I can only refer you to my above response. Whether it was aimed to me or not, is largely irrelevant
Overall, I’m quite happy invested here. I’ve had to rein in my expectations due to the reliability of GC and his comments but I’m still comfortable about making money.

Correction;
It makes me an anxious investor and GC, with the ‘read between the lines’ sound bites, he keeps throwing out, has made me like that.

Doom mongers??? Good grief, how much more childish can a supposed adult be?
I’ll bite though as it seems you’ve conveniently forgotten how the delay in the ESIA was kept from shareholders. You’ve also forgotten how the CEO was using terms like ‘imminent’ and ‘no material change’ whilst knowing about the delay. Posters, including myself stated there had to be a reason for the delay but had ‘that email’ shoved in our faces and total denial of any issues from other posters. Who was correct? I take no pleasure in being correct and neither do I take pleasure finding myself now questioning the validity of anything Graham Clarke says in any interviews. That doesn’t make me a ‘doom monger’. It makes me an anxious investor and GC and his ‘read between the lines’ sound bites, he keeps throwing out.

I know mate. I’ve tried on many occasions to have the patience to interpret Audible’s gobbledygook, but it’s impossible. Obviously English is his/her second language which I can kind of understand. However, I think all they’re doing is pumping his thoughts into Google translate and posting it here, thinking it makes sense.