Member Info for Moljen

Release that RNS mid afternoon and we'd probably be in the 7's now, lowly FD spending hard earned is a better signal than LA putting back pocket change in even though it may have bought more than 400K shares

Sibbo, no they haven't even cleared the last one yet. Note no orderly market selling on this one, this is pure desperation to put some gravy in the boat. Pretty much explains 23rd Sept RNS where MF stepped down, abandoned ship to try and preserve what's left of his integrity after falling for the oft repeated bull from GR and realising it's all a sham. Thats when this placing was decided. Ps where is CF and the gang, oh they probably all sold out and left you holding the spoiled diaper

What a crock of - surely by now even the last of the die hard rampers (hi CF, Napom, Xulu, etc etc) must by now realise they have been and are going to continue to be shafted. The useless so and so's can't even read a calendar properly with this new 1Bn plus shares being issued to the market on 3rd Sept!
Incompetent BoD backed up by even more foolish posters

is getting more desperate, must be needing to do the next dilution. Roll on and it'll not be long before the price is in the 0.01's.
Cue resident rampers to arrive (hi CF et al, hope all well) and tell me I'm wrong again. After 3 years they may get it right sometime but not for the foreseeable future.
Still no reason to touch this one, pure gamble with odds firmly against the buyer as has been now for an awful long time

BB - interesting article, does appear the future is electric but as each day passes more and more information comes along which increases the risk of Zulu ever getting off the ground irrespective of it's size or imminent arrival of EPO. Can't think of one reason why anybody would consider putting new or more money into this the way things stand.

I don't need to do - do a little research on China and their interest in 2D and nano materials and you'll soon ascertain they're already ahead of the curve. Nice of you to lift your head out of the hole in the sand it's buried in and say good morning :-)

were when Chils was getting slated for suggesting we may see the 8's by the rampathon crew. Think we'd all take the 8's any day of the week now as serious consideration has to be given to this reaching the 4's, or dare I say it the 3's.

Interesting announcement by a subsidiary of one my investments -
https://www.smart-energy.com/industry-sectors/storage/new-battery-technology-to-charge-an-ev-100-times-faster/
"The battery has solid-state carbon-ion cells and contains no lithium or cobalt, ensuring relative lower cost and safety."
Could the Li boom be over before we even get our permit from the Zim Govt let alone drill a hole and extract a product?

WIW - Now there is a blast from the past and we both know how that ended. Probably going to be the same result here

Crumbs - I was responding to reasons why the share price was 7p. You are trying to make something which was black and white fact and a technical reason / factor into why a share price may be a certain level into something else and personal. Please don't be so crass, if the question was what I think of Prof Lindy it would have been a very different answer. It wasn't, the only insulting thing is your comment because you didn't engage your brain before making it.

Yet again you are off on one and are now at the stage of throwing out the dummy or taking your football home - aka just sell, put your money in a building society blah blah.
You asked why 7p, I gave you several reasons and gave them a summary heading called RISK.
Afraid my first answer still stands and I can't really make it nay more simple for you to understand. Anyway BS has far more patience than me so I'm sure he'll humour you for a little bit

You asked why 7p ??? I gave you an answer technological obsolscent. Your response is the equivalent to a person in the 1880's saying I don't believe this horse thing will ever be replaced as a mode of transport because in 1880 the car hadn't yet been invented.
Your silly games may work with other people but afraid of no interest to me

Nope, I'm saying the way and the time at which cancer is identified (and hence treated) may change as new technology penetrates the market.

Nope, no mention of making T Cells obsolescent. My comment included new products / processes making others obsolescent. Currently cancer is treated after the event, the way AI and other developments are going how long will it be before we identify and treat (prevent) cancer before it even begins to affect cells?
As I said the reason for 7p is RISK of which obsolescent is just a part

7p??? Probably down to a consistent lack of delivery too target dates / expectations, in terms of bio funding a very small pot for the proverbial pee so always the fear of need to buy a bigger pot, too much IP in the hands of one part time member of staff, as time passes always possibility of new products / processes making yours obsolescent.
Think the dictionary definition to summarise them and others would be the word RISK, hence 7p

And a fire sale price is a fire sale price irrespective of science if one has insufficient funding, just a risk of bio investing

Oh goody, maybe I can give the O'Donnells a bit of respite. Doggo you say you've provided more knowledge than anybody else over 3 years (I've been here for 2). I'd beg to disagree in that respect as I'd suggest you've definitely provided more information in the period but knowledge is the application of information for a purpose. In the same period you've taken your information and your application (knowledge) of it is always concludes great things about to happen / just round the corner. Anybody who has held for the last couple of years knows it hasn't happened just by looking at the share price and their average prices. The people who have provided the best knowledge are those who take all of the information (not just yours) and use it to correctly suggest what / where the share price will go. In that respect, Chilston has shown far better knowledge in his previous comments about the 8's then the 7's.
Tin hat nicely secured so fire away

Definitely not, pretty sanguine about Prem now as past performance means it's a totally insignificant investment nowadays. As said if I ever think something coming out of the Company will materially change this sate of affairs i'll say, in this case this bit is just usual smoke n mirrors. Try realist instead of bitter and twisted, as you said been the right so far

BP all I can say is it doesn't matter whether anybody has been wrong or right here it's cost them money as a shareholder. We are all therefore wishing for a golden moment to occur where we can at least recover our losses, some of you have set your stall on this being it and within the foreseeable future. I've just said why i don't think this is it and based on many years of previous experience it therefore has the potential to be another illusionary carrot to be followed by a placing a worsening share price. We shall see but I expect you'll still be hoping for me to be wrong as reality unfurls.

So using it as it's as good as anything else wiki describes a liquidity event as ...In corporate finance, a liquidity event is the merger, purchase or sale of a corporation or an initial public offering. A liquidity event is a typical exit strategy of a company, since the liquidity event typically converts the ownership equity held by a company's founders and investors into cash.
Straightforward to people?
Next what's Circum's proposed route to a liquidity event? It's the "remains the project development in association with its equity and debt funders, in line with previous disclosures, and which it expects might be concluded by the year end."
So why are people getting excited about year end 2019, that's when the route (ie preferred way of doing it) will be decided not the liquidity event - that's the sale or IPO of Circum WHEN it's developed. Cant remember the build and construct timescale but it'll be 18 months at least.
2022 or 2023 is then the preferred Circum liquidity date. If so god help us as to how much debt and additional dilution GR will achieve by then.
No doubt the moaners will as usual say its just me being me but you have the definition and the preferred year end route, it's not rocket science to work out the resultant liquidity event date.
Perhaps of more concern would be has anything actually started on getting electricity to RHA.
To me just more of the usual buildup prior to another deflating placing and associated reduction in the value of shareholding.