Member Info for Mirasol

Tymers is back - lets remember the good old days.......

Tymers

Tymers Posts: 2,823 Price: 0.25 Strong Buy 05/05/20

RE: Déjà vuToday 17:01

Qwerty I have been buying and selling all the way from 1p to 11p and back down again. Yes WB will touch base with later but qwerty you sound a little desperate now panicked even! Sit back relax await the next II to buy in happy days kidda. Ukog united

Tymers Posts: 2,884 Price: 0.245 Strong Buy 11/05/20

RE: What will happen tomorrow?Today 17:56

11. I O.W confirmed as huge

12 Second II buys in

13 Eco Warriors protest no one to go back to work due to emissions

Ukog United

Tymers Posts: 2,950 Price: 0.27 Strong Buy 28/05/20

RE: The winds of change...Today 15:31

The sp is only going one way from here up quite simple if you want to make some serious money you invest imo huge uplift 1p before long heading to 2p an upwards I knew this was coming like many holders and new are coming on board. Happy Days Ukog United

Patrick

NSTA figures show that production is dropping steadily. Q4 last year they were producing in the 0.16 to 0.175 range regularly. In Q1 2025 they've only reached 0.16 on 4 days and the last few weeks have been in the 0.12 - 0.14 range

Like BP, I suspect they are managing the production to keep the water down and reservoir pressure up until they get the new compressor working.

"These lawyers at ICSID are on $3,000 a day. I repeat $3,000 a day!"

I would be astounded if it was so little -

https://cps.org.uk/research/the-price-of-law/

rates exceed £ 1000 AN HOUR in London

I'm surprised that people are surprised by BP - yes he trades - so does almost everyone on here what ever they say.

the hard data from the NSTA is absolutely correct

the numbers in the Annual reports are as good as the accountants can make them but are"correct"

Numbers in RNS's actually exist but are chosen with extreme care by the management to give the best picture

Anything else - any opinion for example - whoever it comes from - you can interpret it in whatever way suits your agenda at the time. And that includes any "technical" explanations.

26-Feb-25 0.1268

27-Feb-25 0.1261

28-Feb-25 0.1240

01-Mar-25 0.1247

02-Mar-25 0.1251

03-Mar-25 0.1206

04-Mar-25 0.1237

05-Mar-25 0.1249

06-Mar-25 0.1231

07-Mar-25 0.1219

08-Mar-25 0.1186

OUCH!!!

IIRC Star drilled a hellishly expensive well years ago at ?Singleton? that was in that ballpark

- when they don't give you a number you know it was BAD!

Question.

Did they ever tell us exactly how much the last , long drawn out sidetrack cost?

Over the years ANGS have managed to mis-manage/mis-time most technical steps - and they always turn to their "friends" in finance to help them out. The individual shareholder just sees value seeping away (tho nothing like over at UKOG) whilst the finance guys take out their profits. I hope this time round its different but it wouldn't surprise me in the least to see another "arrangement" for more cash at our expense

Desperately needed I think

The field is currently producing at around 50-60% of the P90 forecast by both the 2020 & 2023 CPR's

16-Feb-25 0.1296

17-Feb-25 0.1295

18-Feb-25 0.1313

19-Feb-25 0.1308

20-Feb-25 0.1273

21-Feb-25 0.1178

22-Feb-25 0.1059

23-Feb-25 0.1167

24-Feb-25 0.1256

25-Feb-25 0.0823

26-Feb-25 0.1268

27-Feb-25 0.1261

28-Feb-25 0.1240

01-Mar-25 0.1247

Whilst we all focus on the gas production I've noticed that the water production has been FALLING steadily almost all year.

In Q1 24 it was running at around 50 bbl a day but it's dropped to around 37-38 bbls a day recently.

Sure, production of gas has also dropped, but this is rather odd behaviour for an onshore UK reservoir - water normally increases steadily. It is, however, encouraging as water disposal is always the real control on long term viability onshore.

Ahh "prof Smyth" - caught using a qualification he wasn't really entitled to IIRC... however we should remember that UKOG managed to get the Kimm to flow at HH - but it never made it into regular production.

One might suspect that if it had been facc'd it would have done. Balcombe may be similar. No-one has manged to get the Kim to work in the Weald in recent times.

Ahh "prof Smyth" - caught using a qualification he wasn't really entitled to IIRC... however we should remember that UKOG managed to get the Kimm to flow at HH - but it never made it into regular production.

One might suspect that if it had been facc'd it would have done. Balcombe may be similar. No-one has manged to get the Kim to work in the Weald in recent times.

HH produced around 119,000 bbl of oil at an average of approx 69 bopd in the 57 months it was on production

BP is absolutely correct here. AIM companies have a very long history of releasing extrapolated headline rates without any other information such as pressure drawdown , and most importantly, times.

Who can forget Horse Hill - or, closer to home, Brockham a few years back when a 20 minute peak flow was extrapolated to some immense production number by the then management?

When I downloaded the numbers for the NGT site the figures for the 20th weren't there

This sometimes happens - I think its probably finger trouble at either ANGS or the NGT - they often correct them later but sometimes they don't.

13-Feb-25 0.1387

14-Feb-25 0.1383

15-Feb-25 0.1383

16-Feb-25 0.1296

17-Feb-25 0.1295

18-Feb-25 0.1313

19-Feb-25 0.1308

20-Feb-25

21-Feb-25 0.1178

22-Feb-25 0.1059

Ocelot - you've got the decimal point in the wrong place - the share price is 0.012p not 0.12p

07-Feb-25 0.1429

08-Feb-25 0.1483

09-Feb-25 0.1504

10-Feb-25 0.1472

11-Feb-25 0.1420

12-Feb-25 0.1399

13-Feb-25 0.1387

14-Feb-25 0.1383

15-Feb-25 0.1383

"Zak Mir had a target of 0.66p a while back."

show me one Zak prediction that has come good - he' always hides behind the fiction that he doesn't give advice but he's no better than any other tout