RE: appeal18 Oct 2018 16:24
LA,my view on this is:b4 auction i asked the company if they could bid for the land and if it would be legal.Their response was ,yes we could but will not bid..I interpreted that as a sign of confidence,that none was bidding for it(so must have been the company).Someone out of the blue bidded(unlikely the farmer,imo)tospoil the party.Could be anyone,from FAI,that was against the development from the start(you can see last article on gazzetta canavese that says :"Finally the story is closed")or Villa or someone else.The fact that there is a second appeal means the land is valued much more that 2.68 mill euros,otherwise CLP wouldn`t spend time and money to pay for it.Of course it would have been much better and already resolved,if RKB bidded for the land on that day and,i can tell you,he was nearly there.....My final thought:the land is worth more and CLP will not let go and ,ultimately,will get it.That`s why the B/H will exchange,as well....All points to a november major developments,imo.