RE: Interesting info in AGM Circular27 Nov 2023 10:37
I've voted for everyone except Steve.
We may be frustrated but lets be simple about this:
Either SOLG/Cascabel is sold or
We drift forever into oblivion because we cannot raise the funds to develop Cascabel without massive equity diliution, eithe rby issuing more shares or Convertible debt.
Its a simple fact.
Junior Miners are on their backsides because there is no appetite to fund them in the main market, which is North America, i.e. US and Canada.
Ingo as god as confirmed that a few years ago.
There is one possible alternative and that is to take the Lumniex route, which still essentially involves 'borrowing' money against a stream of metal for the life of the mine. It solves the problem but it is the most expensive form of funding the Capex.
So the alternative is to let the company drift on, doing a bit of drilling here and there, having to raise money probably through equity, meaning more dilution, etc...
Nick did a great job in the exploratory phase of Solgold, proving up vast resources, which are highly saleable buty involve block caving.
And if you decide to vote the Board out, are you doing that because you are angry, frustrated, because you are unable to take responsibilities for investing at prices well above this? Thats not the Board's fault. They never promised anything. Even the present Board has only promised a Strategic Review, which was massively necessary because we have a vast and valuable resource that we simply cannot develop ourselves.
Some people got sucked in by greed, FOMO, the hope of riches, multibagging, whatever, but..
We are where we are. The only sensible thing to do is sell the company, which is what Scott and Bob are trying to do, but until somebody makes a bid we wait. And WHEN somebody makes a bid the value will be revealed for the benfit of all of us.
If you vote the Board out now, consider the apternatives:
The company is headless and at the mercy of its shareholders and, with the past animosity of BHP and NCM the outcome can only b e uncertain. In my opinion that is the most stupid decision because the company would fold before our eyes and be sold for peanuts.
So maybe you think a new, different Board could be elected...at what cost (in terms of exit settlements for Scott et al and remuneration of the new Board/Executive...that would certainly impact the $22.9 million that was left at the end of September)
And whta strategy could they follow? Not an indpependent one, because I say again we are too small to fund or develop the resource.
So it would have to be dominated by one or more major players, i.e. BHP and Newmont who would probably divi things up between them leaving us with pennies.
Because lets be clear. If you vote out this Board and a new one gets elected which is more self interested, what is to stop them doing a massive equity issue which only they would be ab le to afford, leaving us massively diluted.
So in conclusion I say this...be very c