Member Info for Martinigirl

A few questions if I may Daisy1963, I've only been holding here for a couple of years so would like some clarity on things raised by you and others.

1. What was the IPO price? You claim to have held since IPO.
2. What was the highest price to sell post IPO?
3. Why didn't you sell your alleged PO shares at the highest price post IPO?
4. Was there not shareholder value at 7p or 8p or even 4, 5 or 6p?
5. Why do you Daisy1963 continually complain about lack of shareholder value when you could have sold yout alleged IPO shares for a rather significant profit?
6. Are your IPO shares in profit right now? I refer you tonquestion 1
5. Does Daisy1963 in fact hold any IPO shares or indeed ever held any shares whatsoever?
6. Do I need to speak slowly in order to make myself understood?
7. An imbecile born of two imbeciles whether related or not is still an imbecile.
For our trolls I shall quote the genius of Douglas Adams:
"Listen, three eyes,don’t you try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal"

Out

It's been explained in terms that even a simpleton can understand. If I say it slowly will that help? LOOK AT THE TRADE FLAGS THEY CLEARLY SHOW THAT SOMEONE IS BUYING
ANONYMOUSLY AND THEIR TRADES ARE BEING WAREHOUSED SO AS NOT TO GREATLY ALTER THE PRICE OF THE STOCK.

I'll refer you to the following Web page so you can educate yourself on trade flags and what they mean:
https://uk.advfn.com/Help/trade-types-1549.html#:~:text=A%20protected%20portfolio%20transaction%20or,make%20a%20'good'%20profit.

Hope that helps, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing and clearly there are a couple of people here who have very little knowledge.

Raaydaar is right in what he says, anyone with a basic level of intelligence can look at the trade flags a see exactly what is happening here. The detractors can spout all they like, I'm actually surprised that one particular individual is still allowed to post here after their somewhat vitriolic posts of late, facts however speak for themselves and the trade flags clearly show that some trades are being flagged so as not to be visible to the market in general until such time as they are completed. This is not the work of a general PI, it's either an institution or a HNWI who wishes to accumulate a significant position by "warehousing" their purchases for as long as they can. I suspect they will reveal themselves shortly in the form of a TR1 notification. How large a position they are accumulating, one can only speculate but I would suggest it will not be insignificant given the methods they have chosen to make their purchases.

Hi Bonbon, I'd prefer not to share as whilst it's technically in the public domain, it's in a very specific place, I believe it could be classed as price sensitive and I wouldn't want to fall foul of any of the regulations by revealing it here.

If you know where to look there's also plenty of other things out in the public domain that the company has not released to the market via rns. This additional information alone was my reason for using the funds from an insurance policy to add one final tranche to my holdings. The release of the broker note was a welcome addition to my research. I'm sure the company will get round to announcing this information at some point soon.

What people are failing to consider is what's going on the the background. You need to look at the bigger picture to get a better idea of what's going on. Broker note is released and it's a very positive one with, what are likely conservative, revenue estimates for the next couple of years accounts. The broker considers the share to be undervalued by a multiple, how big a multiple? A former TR1 holder decides to add to their position to the tune of about £40k and show their hand as being a major shareholder once again. Then there was the delayed 12 million buy, you don't throw £300k into a company you haven't researched thoroughly, spoken with the management team in depth and get insight about where the business is going. Someone with deep pockets (likely more than 1 wealthy individual or possibly institutions) have enough confidence to build a large stake in the company and I expect we will see 1 or more TR1 notifications in the coming days / weeks.
These people don't take high risk gambles with their money, they have teams of advisors who look at every aspect of a potential investment and manage their risk accordingly, they didn't become wealthy off the back of a random punt, they built their wealth in a careful and calculated manner.
There's a whole lot more going on with this company than we are privy to. Let the team do their thing, sit back and reap the rewards over time.

I also noticed the potential $1 billion potential acquisitions mentioned in the broker note, along with the potential valuation being a multiple of current value. I'm in complete agreement with everything in the note and it validates all of my research into the company. The 12 million delayed after hours buys are a clear and obvious indication that big money is now taking an interest in the company. The current TR1 names hold circa 30% of the company. The new buyer is clearly being aggressive and looking to take a big position. I would suggest they are close to or have already exceeded the 3% threshold, how much more do they want? Giles Fitzherbert (along with Mrs Fitzherbert) hold around 2.9% and I'm aware (through the telegram group) of at least 2 others with holdings just below the TR1 threshold. These 7 holders potentially currently own circa 40% of the company with the new buyer potentially looking for a larger stake. As we know the share price moves quickly (up and down) so if I'm right and the 12 mill buyer is looking to obtain a larger stake then now is the time to be buying and holding.

Had a good read of the broker note. Lots of positives to take away from it, glad I managed to top up before it was released. I expect that was the first part of what is going to be a news rich period. Company will no doubt be rolling out the PR wagon and Allenby will be doing their thing and getting their clients on board. Topped off nicely with the TR1, Marcus Alder obviously sees something he likes to pop his head above the parapet once more.

Wishing each and every one of you a very Merry Christmas, may your table be bountiful, your glass overflowing and Santa bring you something nice.

No need to wait for the January sales, best time to buy is now to bag a pre Christmas bargain. I'm expecting the broker note in January and that's likely to start the ball moving and attract new investors, Allenby probably already working on promoting the company to their clients but the broker note will be the key factor in whether or not they part with their money. I'd suggest they will part with their money when the note is published and they'll be paying 5, 6 , 8p or more before the end of January

As expected the Havelet acquisition completed prior to Christmas and as expected no significant effect on the SP. The team are certainly delivering the goods when it comes to achieving their objectives and the 2b strategy seems to working. What can we expect from 2023? Clearly additional acquisitions will come, how many and for what additional AUM is yet to be seen but if 2022 is anything to go by I would think they will be looking to break $1 billion in Q1 and then with additional acquisitions get maybe $1.25 to $1.5 billion across the remainder of the year. Warrants will be key to achieving this, they'll generate (off the top of my head) $5 million if all are exercised (I'm not convinced all will be), I reckon if that $4 million are exercised that gives the company enough (alongside revenues) to add around $500 million in AUM ($1 million seems to buy $100 million AUM if previous acquisitions are representative). I saw earlier some posts talking of a placing jn 2023, I'm conscious of the fact that the company have stated the possibility of raising funds should the right acquisition opportunity present itself but I'm also cognisant of the fact that the company has other avenues to leverage and raise funds without diluting shareholders. I'm sure that all other avenues will be explored before going to the market and I'm equally as sure that shareholders would want Gobind and the board to be exercising a lot of their options before parting with any monies if the company came knocking.

The MM games were obvious published spread 2.8 / 3.1 I had sell quotes at 2.82 and buy quotes at 2.87 for 100k, they don't want to make a market. They're not short of shares the seller(s) earlier in the week has given them enough in what I've heard described as a very amateurish way. Thankfully the share price has held up reasonably well all things considered. I think (hope) the Havelet deal will be concluded pre Christmas and whilst I don't think it alone will add much to the SP, I think there's more to this acquisition than meets the eye, research shows that Havelet have a largish Guernsey operation and I think that the Barabdos acquisition is a pre cursor to taking over the Guernsey operation too.

Link to video
https://twitter.com/EquityTrader888/status/1589639395388575745?t=2uY0S_EDWgnHphhkJrWY4A&s=19

Gobind hasn't said there will not be a placing. He has said that they will endeavour to utilise other options prior to going to market. I don't recall exactly where it was stated but large warrant holders, have been approached and would be willing to exercise their warrants of required to fund additional acquisitions (of which there are a number at various stages of due diligence), I've been told personally by Gobind that they also have the option to leverage assets to fund additional acquisitions if required and the last and final option would be to go to the market for funding. They understand shareholders don't want additional dilution and it would be a last resort and quite frankly I don't believe they would get the support. Gobind would need to exercise a large amount of his options before I think anyone would consider participating jn a placing. There's another reason a placing isn't happening anytime soon which if you had done any research you would know about. To get to $2bn from present levels all you need to do is gain an additional $1.25bn in AUM, we know from experience that $1million buys $100 million AUM so we're looking at an additional $12.5million investment to buy the requires AUM, that can easily be leveraged against current assets. That's what the intelligent know, the Share22k Daisy tag team make me laugh with their ill informed, uneducated (even I with my 12 O levels and 5 A levels know about punctuation, I was taught it in infant school) opinions.
Daisy before you say anything the boat is in Plymouth being readied for the winter.

I'm not a financial chart person but found this:

https://youtu.be/JRW4tmrV_VY

I'm sure someone with charting experience can comment on the validity of this but it does seem like he is painting a balanced view with a lean towards the positive

I've been through the trade data to check my thoughts on the market makers position to determine if they are indeed short of shared as has been suggested. I've looked at the data from 15th September (when there was a significant increase in volume) up until today.

Total shares purchased 40,339,439
Total shares sold 22,206,471
Difference 18,132,968
That strikes me as a significant number of shares, around 4.2% of the company. Assuming that the market makers still have shares to sell they would have to be holding a lot more than number in order to be able to sell to buyers. Can someone with more experience confirm that the market makers would risk holding such a large percentage of a company where traditionally there has been very little liquidity. If as I believe they would not take that risk then they are offside by a large number.

I have spoken with the FCA today, highlighted my concerns and forwarded the relevant information regarding these "corrections". It will be looked at and further investigations will be carried out if deemed necessary. Unfortunately I won't be informed of the outcome of their investigation but I'm happy the matter is now with the FCA and wrists can be slapped or stronger punishments administered if required.

I would also suggest that if anyone else has any concerns about this activity then they too make contact with the FCA.

I too am intrigued by the large number of "corrections" being printed, especially those from a number of days or weeks ago. I'm not familiar with the regulations but I suspect that market makers are required by the regulations to ensure that corrections are made in a timely fashion. I shall be making a call to the FCA tomorrow to enquire as this to me seems like some sort of blatant attempt at manipulation to confuse and confound the average investor into believing that a significant number of trades are taking place at prices vastly different to the published spread to perhaps encourage some to sell. If that is the case then what is happening must be illegal, at best immoral and should be addressed. If, as I suspect the market makers are short of shares (I believe this to be possible considering the large volumes of buys over the last week or so, it's unlikely the market makers held anything like the millions of shares bought over the number of sells) then they should accept that they have made a mistake and take the hit financially. I will update tomorrow after I have spoken with the FCA

Another day of progress. The increase was nice to see and the closing UT of 3.2 was nice to see but it could have been so much higher. More interesting from my perspective was the early PME which suggests that at the time the market makers had very little stock and the price subsequently increased quickly with the ask jumping from 3.1 to 3.4. They managed to attract the sellers and got hold of enough to set themselves up for tomorrow. Anyone that knows this stock understands that at any one time there is very little available, the vast majority of shares are held tightly. Traders will be in and out with their smaller trades and that helps make the market but the bigger prize will be won by those willing to hold. Acquisition confirmation imminent and maybe 1 or 2 surprises thrown in to add to the AUM.