RE: shale12 May 2018 00:21
I don�t have a lot invested in either company but to answer your question, I think it�s a difficult choice. In the short term If Edr get their planning approval then you should see a decent return. Big IF. They also have shale assets but I don�t think they are as fully advanced as Igas. Overall I would favour IGAS by a squeak, they have a bigger conventional asset base and more advanced shale exploration by way of two exploratory wells due to spud. In a funny way we we�ve come round 5 yrs or so to arrive at the same place; when Andrew Austin founded the company it was based financially on a high oil price with the prospect then of rapidly developing interest in shale, which is where we are now.
You�ll do OK with either company if the Cuadrilla well produces as forecast, but it�s a risk because of course if that enterprise goes tits up it would put things back for years and you might lose a fair packet.
I suppose as the financial advisors say it�s about your appetite for risk and how much losing a proportion would mean to you. If you want a securer bet then Shell, which has invested heavily in natural gas will give a decent dividend and hope of a decent (but smaller) price rise would be better., or Weir who make frack pumps (but are already well priced). I have the other third of my little investment in the latter company.
Just a word of warning, I started my investment journey by investing in Lloyd�s Bank and Persimmon , I nearly doubled my money and then discovered shale gas, since then I think I have lost about three-quarters of that pot, so I�m hardly the one to offer advice.