Member Info for MarkPatrick

OK, thank you. Have a good day.

Stille: probably me being a bit dim, but I don’t really understand your last post which is addressed to me?

Good morning. That’s because the C26 team’s posts are generally based upon research from a team of technically competent analysts. Sadly though, it’s presented without balance and the style is toxic. On occasions, a team member posts something completely without foundation, for example the alleged comments by Moers as he left the business, but they generally get called out on it.

Good morning. You can be sure that Team C26 will have played it both ways - I wonder which pseudonym(s) they used for ramping in 20/21?

C26: (no link = you must be lying) - oh, the irony.

C26: in need of some recognition? Very well done. Hope the boss recognises the team’s effort.

Don’t they? What’s the basis of your assertion? Amongst many potential sources of data it’s important to spot those who spread their ‘wisdom’ with no underpinning evidence - usually driven by dogma, inexperience or their individual agenda. Sound familiar?

He may have just as many eggs in other baskets.

It’s spelling not pronunciation. A bit rich coming from the team who maintain some of your pseudonyms on here.

C26: really? I don’t know which one of you decided to post this as ‘required reading’, but to position it like that is misjudged, again. Collectively you’re better than this, surely.

Chirp, chirp, chirp.

PIF would only invest if they’re confident they will make a return. But, I suspect this is a strategic move and so the return they’re seeking is probably not solely (or even mostly) about AML’s trading performance in isolation - brand, know-how, IP, merger, new product lines - are all in play. Of course, their investment thesis could be wrong, but their move will not be without good reason. Let’s wait and see.

A well known basic assertion technique, known as ‘broken record’.

SP down = C26/haha chirping. So predictable.

I have to say that I think things may have changed for AML. Of course, the trading performance of a business is always important, but it’s less so when a business is seen by a significant investor/acquirer as a strategic asset rather than a trading entity. I could be completely wrong, but recent developments are in my opinion strategic.

Stille: I’m sorry if it’s me, but what is this gobbledegook actually meant to say?

Stille: why would you think that what I’ve said might be implying anything about you? How odd. Who knows, maybe you are or maybe you’re not (the same also applies to me, of course) - it’s an anonymous BB. I suspect you’re not, but I’ll keep my reasoning for that to myself.

The reason they’re here is because they do have some impact on sentiment because some people reading what they write are consciously or unconsciously influenced. Not being influenced requires intellectual discipline, or alternatively, block them.

I agree. That’s my point.

Good morning. I expect C26 will be chirping shortly. Before they do so, let’s just remind ourselves that they’re paid to influence sentiment. They have multiple people and multiple IDs. The different IDs make different assertions and claim success where an assertion aligns to reality. They’re not without ability, but it’s skewed towards achieving a pre-determined goal with little regard for the wider consequences (retail investors/employees etc). That said, it’s how they earn a living. Horses for courses!