Member Info for MarkPatrick

I have to say that there’s a huge number of negative people on here today who IMO don’t understand the challenges of funding the growth of a business and/or they’re being highly manipulative. IMO, the consequences of today’s announcements are that dilution and the consequent negative sentiment will have an immediate impact on the SP, but the short to long term prospects for the business are positive. IMO, keep calm and carry on.

BL: ‘He's the problem here btw’. That’s one take on it. There are others.

Yes, it changes quickly. I’m sure you’re right - so was I when I posted.

I would be guessing. What I do know is that on HL I can sell large amounts of my holding at 1.96p and can’t buy anything over 250K shares. Someone wants them, badly.

Red: you got found out on RR in the same manner. Yes, we’re all here to make money - that’s the ‘what’. The ‘how’ for you seems to include behaviours that most decent people would consider to be unethical - you appear to seek to influence inexperienced retail investors on here with baseless assertions which are intended to improve your own personal position. What a piece of work.

C26: of course you did! You have a track record of offering up interesting catalysts for informed and insightful discussion. You messed up. Own it.

There’s always a first time (for your calculations [or guesses to suit your personal agenda]) to be right).

I suspect C26 posted from the wrong ID. They thought they were logged in on a ‘ramping’ ID!

Badland: it’s good that admin removed the most ill-judged and irresponsible posts of yours from yesterday about the motivation for the horrendous violence in Southport. The authorities have been clear that the motivation for the attack was not as you appeared to suggest. Sadly, and to the disgust of the victims’s families, some extreme people who also wrongly made assumptions about motivation, have brought even more violence to that community. Disgusting.

Maybe someone in authority will in due course declare it a terrorism incident, based upon the evidence. But I haven’t seen that so far.

It was a genuine question. Your response is entirely predictable - unintelligent ranting. It appears that you have no basis for suggesting this absolutely appalling crime was terrorism. Maybe try thinking before jumping to conclusions.

Sorry, attack.

Badland: by using the word ‘terror’ are you suggesting it’s a terrorist arrack and if so on what basis please ie use of violence to further a social or political objective?

Admin: why is this repulsive individual still posting after his r@cist comments this morning. Completely unacceptable.

admin: this ****** needs to be banned. disgusting individual. no place for this behaviour.

HoldingBack: what an uneducated and offensive individual. Reported.

Red, like everyone is entitled to an opinion, which also logically means we’re all entitled to an opinion on his opinion! He was the same on Rolls Royce for what seemed like an age. Also got that completely wrong. Eventually left to the relief of many.

Toffers: IMO, you have zero credibility - based purely on your posting history, you lack knowledge, judgement (and most importantly) integrity. Hopefully that clarifies my position. Now either make a decent contribution or give it a break.

C26: please get a grip of yourself/team member for your own good and self-respect. You’re becoming hysterical and will regret it when you’ve calmed down and read back this desperate posting frenzy.

No, of course Ferrari don’t. But they’re in a completely different stage of their development and have a more stable and mature operating model. Aston are undergoing transformational change which means higher risks (and potentially rewards).