completely agree. i find c26/answer to be a vile and toxic charlatan. back in 2020 it was interesting and engaging. s/he has ruined it. i admire the decent people who continue to engage. to my shame, i just can’t be ****d anymore. admin are a joke.
Dax1: thank you so much for the heads up. What won’t the market like and what do you think is coming? Would appreciate more of your wise input. Actually, don’t bother. Clown.
Pav: to be clear it’s YOUR posts that hold no interest for me because I’m only interested in insightful posts with credible content. Let’s see where we are over the coming days. No doubt you will claim to have bought back in. Bye.
Pav: sadly, people on here are not really interested in your egocentric ramblings. You’re really not as interesting as you think you are. I for one couldn’t care less what you purport to be doing. Fantasist.
RE: RE: Big Helium Field at Rukwa - SP prediction9 Mar 2025 08:32
Good morning Svend. I never ask anyone on here for an opinion, but I’ve grown to highly respect your contribution on the RR forum over many months. May I ask if you can elaborate more on what you’ve posted here please?
RE: So why no release of FS after ML granted?3 Mar 2025 15:25
People on here genuinely calling for the publication of the ML are (rightly) going to be disappointed. It’s commercially sensitive - I would be furious if management were naive enough to publish. Let them negotiate what’s required. There’s also people on here just trying to find something to cause uncertainty. To them - just do one please. Clowns.
RE: TheAnswerIsNo - I think you have been rumbled....22 Jan 2025 07:49
Good morning. At last C26 is exposed for all to see. Never mind whether they’re right or wrong in what they assert in their posts, they are a charlatan and should be banned.
Toffers: having watched you perform over at HE1, IMO you’re in no position to be pointing fingers at anyone about their motivation (even C26!). I don’t block people, but if I did, you’d be first.
Good morning. Been some skilful and subtle chipping away at sentiment by some on here since the AGM by sharing their assessment of the non-verbal communication (NVC) of the BoD and over-interpreting some of what was decided. What was said was generally very positive IMO. Assessing NVC is important but tricky, particularly when it’s being viewed remotely and it’s then more subject to misinterpretation than listening and understanding words. Add in a ‘fall out with a big investor’ narrative and you’ve managed to create an uncertain context for the positive messages. Clever.