Member Info for Marc135

Hi Dr C
You wrote:
"Iconic has been described as 'a diamond in the rough' by tech investors for the past two years"
I would be interested in reading some of these tech investors, can you provide links.
Thanks

I still believe OCADO will be profitable in the long term, so for me this is a long term hold (robots are the future)
And maybe even add some.
If they improve during the rest of this year then by this time next year LTH's will be smiling

20% of nothing (well almost)!

All buys this morning, include one of 1 million shares.
Do some people know something?

We are all dreaming....
I would consider myself fortunate to get my money back! Any profit is a bonus. I would sell before it hit 1p

R101 asks
"1.3M. How much did you invest Marc?"
The answer
£1016.95 at 0.07p each, Jan 2020

It would have to reach 80p share for my 1.3 million shares to make me a millionaire!
I would be happy with anything over a penny.
Still waiting (no choice really) but to be honest not hopeful (but as they say Christmas is coming....)

Opps that should be ..
You seem to be assuming that there is NO future for graphene based products.

You seem to be assuming that there is future for graphene based products.

IMHO they have some very interesting products.
Their problem is the cost of development and the cost of marketing.
An investor with a lot of capital could make a good ROI.

And yes the shares stay in my SIPP

Hi Chesh,
Yes they said that I should be able to trade the shares through Asset Match (www.assetmatch.com) which is supposed to facilitate trading in the Ordinary Shares.
They did say that it would be slower and more expensive (not a lot something like £20 to trade)

Does anyone have any strong views on the merit of voting for or against the de-listing?
I had a chat with a guy at Hargreaves Lansdown which helped me understand what is being suggested.
My view is that is seems like the best option to give the company a chance of recovering. This is in a SIPP that I won't be touching for a few years I can wait and see rather that sell at a loss of 80%

The share price is still above where it was at the beginning of November.
There was little reason for the recent rise given that there are not going to be any sales of helium until (guessing) 2024.
So this is a long term hold for me given that the potential is huge.
I suppose I can afford to say that as my average is around 7p

I am trying to figure out what this means for us private investors the resolution in today's RNS is approved.
Am I right to think that we get subscription shares of equivalent value at the time of de-listing?
And am I also right to believe that we can trade those shares?
If not what happens to our shares?

Whenever I read that something will be done ASAP, I start to doubt that there is any sort of plan.

I would like to be proved wrong, but I consider my modest investment gone. I only hold because I can't do otherwise.

Could the lack of a rise despite the positive future of tidal be because SAE would have to borrow a massive amount of cash or a massive fund raise to actually buy and install more turbines?

Odd that the SP didn't move if this is such "great news".

My view is that the writer was taking a short term view.
With the global population aging and turning to online shopping rather that going out to buy, robots are the future.
IMHO a good long term investment especially at today's price. I am having to hold anyway as my average is over 1000

I have tried to buy on Hargreaves Lansdown and can't get a live quote.
Anyone know why?

Well it worked for me. I just sold what I bought this morning with £50 profit and my average is way down from where it was. Seems like a successful de-risking to me.