Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
ODR - If it was that simple they would offer the asset to the highest bidder. Ask yourself why there's two FRUS companies? As far as we know from snippets on this BBC, Deloitte's don't have any money from FRC to pursue FRUS (Georgia) through the Georgian court system. Plus that route could take considerable time. Whereas, if SN can convince those owed money, that they can get paid in the future, the debts might get restructured. Ask yourself, if you were one of those owed money and the liquidation would give you nothing or you could accept a possibility of something in the near future, which would you choose? IMHO if the former is chosen the director's of those companies could be breaking their fiduciary duties.
ODR - If it was that simple, when FRGC was liquidated the asset could have been taken from FRUS. However, the FRUS subsidiary in the US doesn't have the asset, it's in the FRUS subsidiary in Georgia. Hence, the many arguments on here about whether our shares in FRC will be transferred to FRUS.
As far as we know it was moved to FRUS. However, when the asset was first moved a 5% Royalty Agreement was left in order to satisfy commitments. I assume that SN wants to deal with Deloitte's to try and regain the 5% RA. Plus it may have implications for the tax recovery pool of around $500m under the PSA. The Georgian Dream party and the October elections may also influence the outcome. The current lurch towards Russia and away from the EU isn't a good sign, although the people are demonstrating in their thousands.
Looed - All those aftershocks and alerts sounds like torture. Thankfully, your still safe and well. Just ignore the kipper... 's of this World or take cabraz's advice and put him in a little green box.
It's not the 70's anymore with Carlos the Jackal highjacking planes. Flight security has increased. Plus as far as I can remember there were three separate private flights taking government officials from the UK alone.
What about the oil deals prior to the conference?
Always made me smile that phrase. Lenin called the Labour Party 'useful idiots' and they still supported him lol!
'Turkey's voting for Christmas' also sums them up well lol!
If this was written as fiction, it would be dismissed as too far fetched. It's only reality that can get away with such blatant lies. I think it was Hitler who said that the bigger the lie, the easier it was to convince people.
Quady - Did you pay attention to what happened at their last meeting. They arrived in their private jets and thrashed out major oil deals before the conference started. They then agreed on how they should get us all to reduce our Carbon footprint, before they jetted home in the HUNDREDS of PRIVATE PLANES! They're taking you for a mug. Wake up and smell the coffee!
No funding Quady? Did the money for the research come from 'Labour's magic money tree?'
If it screams out fake news you'd better contact the court in Finland and tell them Dr Aseem Malhotra has been lying under oath.
The same numbskull who sold our Gold reserves off at $278/oz (it was over six times higher a few years later) started taxing our pensions. Our pension system was the envy of the West until that point and now there's a huge hole, hence the opening of the floodgates. It doesn't detract from the point that the 50% increase from the initial projected figures from the early noughties to 2030, will result in 50% more pollution etc.
Quady - There's lots of research programmes in Cardiology fields at Oxford. Show the proof that there's no funding that could be withdrawn.
The population increase from 56m to 75m + is almost 45%. The initial projected drop from 56m to around 54m is a decline of just under 5%. That's a swing of 50% or 50% more than the initial projection prior to the influx of immigration.
WoodyB - I agree, but real environmental issues don't count only the MMGW scam. Controlling immigration could have reduced the population and hence pollution etc by 50%. Yet the.LibLabCon are all aligned on illegal immigration, plus even the Green Party.
Quady - IMHO this doesn't imply funding for research at Oxford into the COVID jab, but funding in general, as the research councils are all top heavy with industrialists with vested interests. George Monbiot wrote about this power of the multinationals in 'Captive State: The Corporate Takeover of Britain' and on many occasions in the Guardian.
It's the staffing issues which are the problem, creating a stressful workplace and a feeling of entitlement. Labour closed the cottage hospitals and estimated a 5% reduction in the UK population from 56m to 54m by 2030. Then they opened the floodgates to immigration and now we're heading for 74m+ or around a 45% gain. That's a swing of 50%, but we don't have 50% more frontline NHS employees or beds. There was one newspaper in the early noughties where they were articles about closing a secondary school due to pupil numbers declining and spending £16m on a new Midwifery Unit due to a boom in the birthrate in the same city.
Tesla - 80k Doctors, nurses and other NHS workers you suggest refused the COVID jab in the hope of catching COVID to get 10 days off work.
I see you have no respect for people working for the NHS.
Quady - I haven't stated that funding has been withdrawn. I have repeatedly asked you to explain why 80k NHS workers would risk their jobs and why Dr Aseem Malhotra, Dr John Campbell and Prof. John Ioannidis would risk their jobs and reputations? Plus why would Andrew Bridgen MP turn down promotion for expulsion from the Tory party just to tell the facts about the COVID jab? Are all these people deluded or principled.
It's not one expert, it's many, plus 80k NHS worker's who if not experts, are in contact with experts and also working in a relevant industry.