Member Info for LWHL

Well, they have been in business for a while. Agree the chart is ugly right now, but they should have certain provisions in place to prevent a 'blow out'.

But certainly not going to claim this is a screaming buy right now, because as I said earlier, it is a falling knife.

Good support around 42p, by my TA reckoning, although looks like a bit around 44p as well. M pattern risk maybe?

See where we are in a few months. GLA.

And to you too, Mary. Hope you had a good Christmas and NY.

And here we are again, at the ready, to see what this lively name has in store for us shortly!

Always nice to see. A respectable amount of shares too, IMO. GLA.

Yeah, I have been revisiting my own research of late too :)

Have stopped adding now, because I do not want to build an out-sized position here...and it is just a falling knife right now.

Bear market-like, although it is not simply moving with the markets. Which is, in itself, a slight concern.

Fairly decent overhang left too, judging by a couple of dummy buys I did earlier.

As long as the fundamentals remain solid, then hopefully the worm will turn sooner or later.

A small buy back might help, subject to the above. Either that, or the BOD needs to whip up some appetite in the investment community to take on some of these overhanging shares. IMO.

JJ: Perhaps I am misremembering, but I do not recall you offering any caveats at that time, only that you would buy at X prices.

Anyway, it does not matter and I am not having a go at you about this. I was just pointing out why some may have pushed back on you. I am not taking sides. It was rarely an enjoyable experience at school and positively tedious as an adult.

James: The problem is the central bank! Not just them, but what about their policy actions since 2020...in fact going back to the GFC really? Where is the accountability and scrutiny? The consequences for failure?

I suspect we will likely have to agree to disagree on this topic, but a return to cheap money will come with its own consequences. We are not out of the woods with the 10 year yield yet either, IMO.

But time will tell and all we can do as individuals is position ourselves as best as we can to ride whatever waves come.

Something that I suspect most of us here will probably have the luxury of, although we are probably not generally representative of the wider population. GLA.

Nice price action today! Fingers crossed. GLA.

I guess you could say that. It is a logical premise.

I certainly would not suggest anyone buy or sell any stock, based on the opinions of any poster.

But I would certainly urge caution for those who might be new to this share, having seen the recent pump and hearing that the Stalicla deal must be close now. When we have absolutely no evidence to back this up.

Along with no new deals, the Juv debacle and a cash runway that will need addressing before too much longer. The months roll by quickly.

But hey, this is AIM, so anything is possible, as I often say. GLA.

That also depends. Check with your broker to see if they will allow de-listed shares, even in a trading account.

Good luck to those of you who decide to stay the course. I hope it works out for you.

Have you checked with your accountant or IFA that you will still be able to hold your shares here in an ISA wrapper?

Do not leave on account of critics. These chat boards benefit from bull and bear opinions.

But if you have now changed your mind about those plans that you did mention here a few times, then why not just say so?

I have U-turned on various trading plans a number of times. And tend to point these out, when I have changed my mind.

Rigid plans, come what may, are often a way to lose money in the stock market. Especially shorter term trading stuff.

I think that is why some are giving you a hard time.

Not that anything here matters, insofar as moving markets etc. Just a bit of fun, with quite frequent nuggets of valuable insights from a wide range of people with different skills and knowledge.

Which can be very useful in helping add to and even improve one's own bull or bear views.

Anyway, GLA.

That is certainly an approach that has worked well for some over the years.

But very few companies never cut or suspend their dividend at some point over a period of years. So you still need to keep an eye on those positions IMO.

Either way, some people like trading, so it does not have to be an either/or proposition :) GLA.

The central banks control the game, James. Not the politicians. Here and across the Pond. Almost certainly every country, or most of them probably.

But they do have some control over public spending. And until/unless we get a government that reverses the current trend of expanding government jobs, while our real economy private sector shrinks, then the whole thing will, sooner or later, come crashing down.

But the BoE will almost certainly lower rates, and more than once, in 2025. Which will have some positive and some negative consequences. Considerably more downside for the masses, IMO, but it was ever thus. GLA.

Well, if they turn out to be right about 2025, then it will make the SP less frothy than it currently is, IMO.

But as I have said before, as long as the main shareholders are happy, then nothing else matters.

On a technical basis, if you can get above, and hold 182.87p, but initially the 200 DMA of 175.05p, then it would IMO be a bullish signal. GLA.

Nothing to scare the horses, I agree.

A 'hold' for me, although if the SP returns to the low 50's in the weeks following ex-div, I will probably add a few.

In the unlikely event we return to the low 70's, I would probably trim a few. GLA.

The strong roll call of major shareholders was something that kept me patient here for years.

It was even more impressive a few years ago.

RENE's was pretty good, at one time. As was 4D's. SNG, my only ten bagger, captured some big backers too. It might still do something special, but not for holders in an ISA wrapper. Maybe they will have a matched bargain facility. No idea yet. Certainly not to the advantage of small shareholders IMO, but long since had no skin in that game, luckily.

I thought you had thrown in the towel Mark? Or perhaps you are a different poster?

Anyway, just for some balance.

And, while my opinions of the prospects, and faith/trust in the BOD are obviously low, I wish holders well here. You feel the opposite and that is fine. What makes a market etc.

The rise is certainly unusual for this name.

If news follows in the next few days, then it would certainly not look good. Although nobody will care. This is AIM, after all.

But a note of caution. Do not invest more than you can afford to risk. Of course, the same applies for all equities, but it is vital on AIM.

Just look at the recent RNS for SNG.

Not suggesting the same will happen here, but more as proof of the need for extreme caution.

It is hardly the first in this space, and it will not be the last. GLA.

I took a few more in the 350's to add to the other ones I mentioned the other day.

But the afternoon rise was too tempting not to take a quick profit on. So I did.

Got a few left in the tank, looking for a bit more from. Happy to bottom draw them potentially, if needed.

Would be delighted to see a premium bid out of the blue, but no idea of the realistic prospect.

Anyway, it will be interesting to see if this is going to finally break out of this range shortly.

Nice to have chalked up another small gain here in the meantime. GLA.

Not really. 2% is the target. When was it last 2%?

Better than higher of course, but only a crumb of comfort.

Still, nice dividend while we wait for better times. GLA.

Perhaps. Either way, this one has been in a tight trading range for quite a while now.

IMO, it is going to break out before too much longer. Hopefully to the upside, but I have no feel for it right now, so I will plump for 50-50 odds :) GLA.

They could not do any worse than the continuity clown show of the past few decades.

But if they stick with the public sector cuts of 5%, as I think they touted in their last manifesto, then it will be very much a case of fiddling while Rome burns.

They should take a leaf out of Milei's book IMO.