Member Info for LWHL

I took a few more off the table yesterday myself (although I still have plenty), but simply because gold is IMO right at the very top of the long historic channel.

And so a decent pull back is fairly overdue. Certainly gold is very overbought on the technicals.

I do not see it dropping right to the bottom of said channel, but even half way back would likely offer a decent chance to re-buy in the low 8's. Maybe even high 7s, subject to all the usual caveats.

If it somehow does not and keeps on going, well, that will be fine too. GLA.

Nevertheless, I added a few more this morning.

I have seen BB's take some time to churn sellers in a number of other stocks (BATS and OSB as two such examples), so I think this one will see positive results in relation to the SP, sooner or later.

In the meantime, a nice dividend in the pipes and IMO as I said the other day, a business that is moving in the right direction, based on the recent update and current fundamentals.

This is not a technical trade for me (current TA suggests different things, depending on the chart time-frame, as far as I can tell).

Could see 110p, depending on wider market sentiment, but then the dividend would be around 5% or so, making it an increasingly attractive dividend play. I would buy more if that price hits, but as always, time will tell. GLA.

No harm in posting it again. It is a valid viewpoint.

While this is still only a planned trade for me, I can see why some others still view this more as a long term hold. I can see the argument for that thesis as well.

Some hefty inside buying would likely make this one a combined trade and investment name for my p/f. GLA.

Why not? It is surely a point of consideration, even if it relates to historical expenditure.

But as I also said, it is nevertheless an asset sale, so that is a start. GLA.

For 250K plus some more Metals One shares.

What really caught my attention though was this paragraph in the MET1 RNS: 'According to management accounting information provided by 80M, in excess of €3.8 million (£3.2 million) has been spent historically by 80M on drilling and exploration activities at Hammaslahti.'

I am sure that comments will involve a mixture of bull and bear thoughts on this deal.

My own broader opinions are basically unchanged, but I did comment in the past 'where are the asset sales'? - so, I have to say, fair play, they have finally got one away, and I hope for holders (and myself via my PMI stake) that more follow and for more substantial sums of money, soon. GLA.

While we need to see what the closing price will be of course, given the lack of any real bounce today, I think the odds favour the Stupmy-highlighted gap fill tomorrow.

Not adding further unless/until then. Except in the event of some decent inside buying.

Regardless of the above, my position is small enough to let this one ride for a bit, and I naturally see my price target hitting sooner or later. But time will tell, lol. GLA.

I think it reads like pretty much all the other ones before.

Until SOH can show actual profit, or at least genuinely significant revenue, then IMO this will remain one for punters and quick traders (although no judgement from me, BTW) - not serious investors, let alone the big money.

Why would he sell SBTX and PBX stock to distribute a special divi? Are they not worth what they are currently priced at, or are they not a better long term investment to retain?

Either way, certainly not something to do, unless the days of needing to dilute OPTI shareholders are over for good, to my mind.

I took a few more myself. Enough now to make a retest of the 50 DMA (which I think will get rejected) a nice little profit.

Or will add a few more if that aforementioned lower gap gets filled.

There is a gap fill slightly above the 50, that I would not rule out seeing either in the short term...but that is enough of my tea leaf posting for now, lol. GLA.

Currently in auction. Up or down...? Place your bets! GLA.

I have taken a small punt this morning. I will add a few more if Stupmy's gap fill price hits.

Hopefully we will see some strong inside buying, now the window to do so is open.

If not, I would expect the bears and shorts to push this down further. GLA.

Lots of interesting RNS's recently. Not least the one 30 minutes ago.

Bit of a stink to this IMO, but it is what it is.

Again IMO, any PI's thinking of jumping into this one now, should be very careful. Not advice in any direction of course, to be clear.

Your money. Do what you want with it, lol, but the BOD has shown what it thinks of its ordinary shareholders by their actions since...well for ever, pretty much.

It will be interesting to see if this one ends up being de-listed soon, as so many of these types have in the past couple of years.

But they have no need of money! You might well proclaim. Indeed, so therefore it should not happen, eh?

Perhaps I am wide of the mark on this occasion. Time will tell. Still a barge-pole name IMO, but to each their own views. GLA.

Is a RSI, going from those points that you mention, without much of an increase in the SP from the lows at the same time, a bullish signal?

Genuine question. I broadly understand headline RSI stuff, but the point you make seems a bit more nuanced, hence my question.

Have any of you emailed IR yet to ask the question?

Not sure how good they are at responding to smaller shareholders (some are better than others, in my own experience, although have never had any contact with the ones here, so no idea).

I do think that declarations on chat boards that a RI is certainly going to happen, is unwise. For obvious reasons.

All that said, I also think that the company should be putting out an RNS, because the price action here is not simply mirroring similar names in this space, over the past week or month, for example.

It could well just be essentially nothing but some II selling, which in turn has led to others dumping, then broken key technical support levels, triggering more stop losses and so on. IMO, part of the job of a CEO/BOD is to manage situations like this when they arise. But just my thoughts. GLA.

Or Frasers is continuing to reduce, and there is simply not enough buyer appetite to prevent this meaty drop. Works well for shorts, too.

Not sure that Jose stepping away would upset the markets. I think he has failed, really.

A raise? Maybe. Since the talk of restructuring the finance back in February (was it?) I have kept away. While always keeping one eye on proceedings, because it has been a splendid trader for me.

Must be due a technical bounce sooner or later, but hard to call a range right now IMO. I cannot see one yet, anyway. GLA.

I know what you mean, Guttersnipe. But the City is rarely fooled by opaque accounting techniques.

JD is not particularly 'bad' on this front, but I personally ignore EBITDA in any report that I read.

Because I take the same view that Charlie Munger held in relation to this particular metric.

I would suggest that the key things to be mindful of (in any name, not JD-specific) simply are: profit, revenue, debt (and debt maturity dates etc), and to a lesser extent, any other assets or liabilities (for some of the older names, even pensions can be a fairly important feature to consider) - and what is the trend of these key metrics over the past 2-3 years (eg going up or down?)

Someone like Pokerchips though would probably be able to tell you if I have missed anything out that also deserves mention. But IMO, the KISS method is the best way to go, in relation to this particular topic.

As for JD: I honestly do not know what the next set of results is going to show, beyond being within guidance. I suspect at the lower end, but it will IMO be the forward looking statement that is going to be very interesting.

Just the investment pot here still, and so close to results, I am probably not going to jump back in again for another side pot trade until then. But never say never :) GLA.

The chart certainly looks like it is forming a bowl right now, although maybe too early to say.

I also added a few more here. Hopefully at least a retest of the 50 DMA in the next couple of weeks, although with the lively VIX of late, taking only one day at a time, lol. GLA.

All things considered, I would have expected at least a retest of the 37.40p, based on that update.

We need radical changes in this country. Milei on steroids.

In the meantime, the corporate strangulation will continue.

I have no idea how to price this one right now; have kept it on my radar since last being a holder here. Going to keep a watching brief I think, and see if anything looks interesting in the charts in the next few days. GLA.

The shareholders need to put this dog down. What a classic AIM wealth destroyer.

One of my historic losers, but the fact it has managed to stagger on, after all this time and such absolute failure, is a testament to sunk cost fallacy thinking by too many of its shareholders, IMO.

GLA anyway.

It would be unforgivable at this late stage, if they were to report figures below guidance.

I agree with the other poster who is confident that they will be within guidance.

I think it is as much to do with what their forward-looking statement might entail, as it is to do with the current indices-wide negative sentiment.

If you look at other high quality names in the discretionary retail sector right now, you will see similarly sickly SP charts.

German CPI data tomorrow, as well of course. GLA.

I think it was just a reaction to hitting the top/just bursting through, that upward channel that I cited the other day, or whenever it was.

No bad thing to have little retraces on the way up, although we have a few gaps now too. So am mindful that they might need to get filled before we have another go at the year high and beyond. GLA.