Member Info for LWHL

Correct. That was the only comparison that I was drawing between the two.

I am hoping for a bid here and it does not seem that far fetched a concept, IMO (even though everyone says that about every beaten down stock, lol).

No chance before results though, so in the likely event that I am still a holder here by then, I may still be in the hunt if that scenario materialises in the days or weeks that follow.

I think a lot of holders would de-risk/exit entirely, if we were to have a run up close to 4 quid, pre-results.

I know I would.

And therefore, IMO a best case scenario would more likely be a run up to around 330p, maybe as high as 345p-ish.

Fun to speculate anyway and I hope to be proved to be overly cautious with my muse :) GLA.

Just when you think the dam thing is starting to form a solid base...bang! A new low print, lol.

Definitely sitting on my hands now until the update. As other posters have suggested, it is mostly all about forward guidance.

If the results are more positive than the market appears to consider they will be, IMO we are going to see an ASOS-type move here.

That is the one good thing about having a terrible chart like this one going into results, although I guess there is still enough time for a strong rise into them, in theory. GLA.

Toss of a coin on that or a failed test of the 50 in the next few trading days, IMO Stupmy.

I think how the markets perform later across the Pond and into next week, will have as much as, if not probably more, influence on our stocks, including this name. Regardless of US exposure. Notwithstanding any company or topic-specific new news arising, of course.

I am amenable in principle to your suggestion last night. Not sure of the practicalities, but let's keep it in mind and continue our enjoyable dialogue on these chat boards for now. GLA.

Well done holders. IMO, you should at least test the 50 DMA today and possibly beyond.

If this update does not create at least a small short squeeze, I would be surprised. GLA.

I completely agree, Stupmy. It comes across as so arrogant as well.

To begin with, I was only an investor, with a long term horizon.

Over time, I have taken a more hybrid approach to stock market stuff. More heavily weighted towards day, and in particular, swing trading now, in fact.

Guess which one is (by far) the more profitable strategy?

OK, the period is only around four years to date for said hybrid approach and of course, I might get bored of it one day. Being in a position where I can take that decision lightly.

But I know that I am not rare in achieving these kinds of improved returns with this strategy.

I am very much a novice compared to many others, with significantly lower returns, no doubt proportionate to their level.

I do get the impression however, that I probably do better than a significant majority of LTH investors. Certainly on these chat boards.

Everyone has different aims, different degrees of free time and appetite to play the markets. So absolutely to each their own way.

I consider them no better or worse - and certainly not mugs - for doing things in their fashion.

I am not sure why that comment has agitated me today, lol, but more importantly, I got another small fill here late in the day.

Still just a swing trade, but as long as this mug ends up locking in a profit from it, then nothing else will matter to me :) GLA.

Buttons inside purchase. Better than a sell of course, but I really think he should have opened his wallet a bit wider, lol. GLA.

I have done that myself, many times. But the gardening approach is certainly the best way to manage risk and generally maximise profits, IMO.

As long as the stock is not a proper dud, then you can generally get away with the poor entries with that approach, too.

Just had a glance over at WG. Still dreadful bilge in the main, lol. GLA.

Clearly long, if you read a few of his posts.

CC: The same can be said for all the other assets as well though.

Apart from Dundas, which we were led to believe was 'shovel ready' years ago...and not a brass farthing generated from it yet.

Anyway, busy day today, so have a good one and good luck.

Splendid. Glad I added a few more the other day, although at the time I was wondering if I was throwing good money away :) GLA.

Well, I will be delighted if we are still in the early stages of a SP rise here.

If it was not for the manipulation and deliberate suppression of PM prices (especially gold), then we would see significantly higher spot prices already IMO.

I do not see proper price discovery being allowed to happen, but that does not mean that we will not see 4K gold one day, and potentially much higher.

It depends on how much more road there is to run on global fiat currencies, and what measures the central banks take to delay the inevitable currency collapse. AIMO, naturally.

I assume you are referring to the WG board? I stopped reading it recently, as it seems to now be mostly the same ramper and de-ramper posts, and public domain material, regurgitated over and over and over again, lol :)

In your shoes, I would stop following it and just follow the charts. The live trading action will tell you if anything material has landed PDQ.

Anyway, hope you get a good outcome there, mate.

Then you have not been a shareholder here for as long as I have!

This one has form for sharp moves. In both directions.

I am not suddenly bearish, or looking to scare anyone (not that anything anyone on a chat board says should ever have any influence on any investment decisions anyway), but if the TA plays out as I think it might, then a 10% or greater retrace from here could easily occur.

Which would not change the upward channel that we have been in for quite a while now. So it would not be a sell signal in itself.

Like I said earlier, I retain plenty here and as I also said a while ago, I will probably keep a fairly large chunk of this one until I am pushing up the daisies, but even with the dividend in the pipes - if we get gold and silver spot price retraces - then we are, almost certainly, going to see a retrace in the SP here.

But it hardly matters though, does it? All the relevant previous points still stand. Just because ARCO burned through more cash in the past, than this one did in more recent times on the asset in question, does not change a thing.

And I reject the implication that I am not offering a balanced perspective.

The long and short of this is that the sum is chicken feed at best.

Let's see some asset sales that bring in real money.

I have no problem with them selling assets, to concentrate on a smaller, more focused p/f, in principle.

But they always seem to veer in one direction, then another, all the time burning through cash and diluting shareholders, without actually achieving anything of note.

You could say this sale is something of note. If it was a few million quid, I would then agree.

But let's be honest. It is chicken feed.

And you never know when they are going to announce another acquisition that needs more funds, and one that is of questionable value.

As I said a while ago, it is not like they are a major with deep pockets, who can do such things without touching the sides.

But it is what it is. And as always, I wish you and your fellow small shareholders here, well.

It has been a while since this one last scored a century, lol, but now we have broken above the 200 DMA, hopefully this time we can close above it, and kick on in the weeks ahead. GLA.

I think that for JL and Greenswitch, which other posters have commented on in some detail previously, we can only suggest that the proof of the pudding will be in the eating.

Following the same analogy, we do however now know a lot about the Finnish pudding.

I guess you could say we do not know yet if it will cause indigestion, or worse, lol, because we will need to see what MET1 achieves with it.

Certainly the market has given its early verdict, but bulls will likely suggest that they think the market has somehow missed this, or some other explanation for why this is not top of the leader board etc.

More to the point, what do you think of this asset sale and more generally some of the comments made by Rach earlier?

I know she is broadly disliked here, but IMO the value lies in the actual information, not how it is presented. That goes for all chat boards, not specific to this name.

I did not know about Austria. Lol.

If I ever get on the wrong side of you, RachT2, let me know...so I can offer grovelling apologies :)

Tarnished reputation? Lol. Nonsense.