Member Info for LWHL

I suspect most here only have a small position. But presumably, we do not like being duped, or if not that, then at least losing.

Which most here, except those perhaps on a free carry, are currently doing.

I do not think it is attempts to move the SP. Well, the blatant rampy ones are, lol. But ones like mine are just calling it straight.

The only reason I am still here, albeit in a very small capacity, which is not going to change without sublime news, is because the chart to my mind still looks interesting!

But that is not a recommendation to buy - just to be absolutely clear. GLA.

Yep. Lol. Even an AIM CEO might blush for shame.

It feels like there could be a joke in here somewhere. Perhaps along the lines of how many to change a light bulb etc.

If this one goes to traditional form for a lifestyle outfit, we will next hear some detailed fluff, along with the begging bowl and a heavily discounted raise.

Perhaps little else before then.

Which, for an outfit at this stage of proceedings, is worthy of mirth, IMO.

Needless to say, I will be delighted if he proves me wrong and I have to give a virtual salute of appreciation. Whether I am still a shareholder at that point, or not.

Still am right now, but with an itchy trigger finger, it must be said....

I agree. About fairly valued right now, IMO. Proof of continued growth means not highly frothy either though (again, IMO) - but I would not be surprised to see 414p tested, perhaps even as high as 450p-ish, if the shorts do not take the chance to exit quickly now. Given the very small free float.

One of the features that appealed to me with this name back when it first came on my radar.

As oversold as this was only two months ago, it can easily become just as overbought in a heartbeat if the macro conditions allow, I think it is fair to say.

While I am tempted to close out my remaining position right now (a couple of historic sell orders hit yesterday and one ambitious one, earlier today) - I am going to sit tight for now with the remainder, and see where we go. GLA.

Does not really matter right now, IMO. The macro/VIX stuff is driving broad sentiment, and sweeping all but the utter dog outfits along for the ride.

Hopefully not a brewing crack-up boom, lol. GLA.

Usually a good contrary indicator, are such statements, I find :)

Anyway, one gap fill ticked off. A couple more to go before I take a fresh view here.

A close above 80.84p would be splendid, but no biggie either way really. GLA.

Golden cross incoming as well, which may attract some new technical traders.

1.20% disclosed shorts at the time of print. Hopefully they increase...then feel the squeeze, lol. GLA.

Yeah. Most of the metrics are good, and nothing that concerns me for those metrics that are less impressive. A hold for me.

The market may well have already priced them in though. Not long to find out... GLA.

An oversight brought about by it giving every appearance of being one of those AIM dogs perhaps, lol.

But theoretically more regulatory scrutiny on the main market, so there is that I guess.

I think charts are useless when it comes to tiddler AIM stocks. Not proper companies. Where TA has some real merit, IMO.

I took my punt here based on liking the chart. Even though I hold this view.

Hence it only ever being a punt. A small punt at that. But just in case the chart comes good here, lol.

Multibag or bust. But I am getting bored with this one now.

Where are the management, to at least give the impression that they are doing something to earn their way?

A pre-revenue, early stage AIM tiddler with a quiet management team is usually only going one way, in my view. Tick tock :)

Yeah, nothing says buy low, sell high/make sure you take some profits, more than the 10 year chart here :)

Regardless, I fancy this bowl formation here, even if it will probably come under pressure with the ex div factor.

VIX under 17 at the time of print, on a chart that looks to be a sell/short, IMO. Short term at least.

Looking for my target price and happy to wait and collect the div in the meantime. GLA.

Still very tightly range bound, and not hit the bottom of the channel yet either.

So my buy orders are waiting patiently.

And might not get filled.

Be careful with that short, lse. You never know what might happen with a stock like this. GLA.

3rd June post, if you want to check it. I had a buy order at that time, which I mentioned and was about 6p lower than the SP at that time. That in itself was actually a couple of pence or so higher than the technicals were pointing to, as I remember.

But I owned up to taking a foolish book mark holding prior to then and around 80p I think.

So I ended up ignoring TA and buying more incrementally on the way down. Not TA driven purchases. A change of plan, driven by being comfortable with having a position here more generally.

Anyway, I will stop cluttering up this board for now, lol. GLA.

My repurchase here was not based on TA. I am pretty sure I even said that back at the time.

I only have mentioned gap fill opportunities that I had/have in mind. Obviously time will tell if they fill.

I feel the Gary Player quote is a good response to your most recent post.

I should buy a lottery ticket eh? How did I manage to call so many price points across a range of names, where my post specifically cited matters relating to TA?

REC is a quiet chat board. Have a look. How lucky was my call citing a multiyear low print in the winter, long before that name was anywhere near to it?

To be clear: when a stock is an investment, I do not necessarily sell if I see bearish technicals. That one being proof. Lots of my posts there comment on other stuff beyond technicals, for this reason.

But I am not trying to convince anyone. And have been clear about my limitations with TA.

Stock market stuff is fun, but a challenge that I have chosen to take up, because various business ventures in the past have given me the platform to do so. Because you never really retire, you just do something else.

And golf all day gets boring, if you are not passionate about it. And rubbish at it :) GLA.

I think the best ones do beat the index by a considerable margin. And it is important to emphasise that even the best indicators and patterns do not play out 100% of the time. So knowing when to exit a trade and being extremely disciplined with the process, is vital.

Be it cutting losers, or cashing in winners at the right time according to the technicals etc.

I usually try and combine research, fundamentals and technicals for investments (and sometimes trades).

Very occasionally, I will use only TA for a short term trade and absolutely nothing else! Always small stakes in those cases, because my confidence in my TA abilities as I said before, is justifiably on the humble scale, lol.

Last time was ASOS, a while back. I actually did really well on that one for a while. Loads of small trades, which soon add up. 100% success rate. Netted well over 50% capital gain during a period where the stock was actually slightly down or flat. Very pleasing.

The main reason why I stopped was because I saw other avenues that I felt offered better prospects in the short and longer term, and only so much time in the day that you have/want to spend on this stuff, lol.

The test will perhaps come when we next see a proper bear market, where buy the dip does not work.

So no complacency from me all the same. GLA.

I think we agree for the most part, and the only way I would put more cash in here via a future raise, would be if they could provide strong evidence of it being commercially credible for me to do so.

Certainly a part of the criteria would require the raise to be at a share price comfortably higher than today. Otherwise, the dilution would be too significant.

In a negative scenario, it's a dump and move on, for me.

Adding as a loss-chaser or simply leaving it alone to be diluted to zero (or as good as) is a T-shirt I already have in the world of AIM.

And the wardrobe does not need anymore of them, because when they are 'that type' of AIM stock, they are basically identical, lol.

But for now, the jury is out on this one, and the BOD have the benefit of the doubt. For now. GLA.

Well more fool you, then.

TA done properly is extremely reliable (I make no such claims to being an expert in TA, by any stretch at all) - but even with my low level TA abilities, I have been able to execute so many more profitable trades and side pot trades than without using TA.

The fascinating thing too, is how often it runs against macro, or even company-specific narratives, in the short term.

Some patterns play out more often than others, and the effectiveness of TA when it comes to nano cap stocks is I think, less, perhaps even totally, unreliable.

But to each their own. GLA.

Well, the selling pressure had to relent sooner or later. Especially with the BB programme.

Combined with a market-wide relief rally.

But the bounce here does seem a bit more pronounced than similar names, so who knows?

I would certainly welcome a bid, even though it is not part of my trade thesis here. Even some fresh media coverage would be handy, lol.

Either way, the minimum we need to see to suggest we might be coming out the other side is a close above 80.51p. But really 98.12p (200 DMA).

This one moves fast, as we all know, so even the 200 DMA could be tested PDQ in the right conditions, and without the need for a bid rumour either.

As I usually seem to say...see where we are in a few days or weeks time :) GLA.

Yeah. Getting into this name at this point in time is absolutely a gamble, where you are betting on them delivering revenue earning projects etc. Essentially building a real business.

IMO, the quality of recruits so far appears of a considerably higher calibre than is often the case with this type of early stage nano cap.

But sure, plenty of investors would rather wait until they start winning contracts etc. Which is fine and in many ways sensible. Because they might not.

However, anyone on board already knows this. And has done so as they think if this risk pays off, the rewards will be very significantly higher than playing it safe will lead to.

Obviously. And of which I am one - albeit punt money only at this stage.

Pays your money etc. GLA.

Is always nice to see.

Nevertheless, I have taken some more off the table. GLA.

In case the 270's get rejected again.

Will happily pick them back up if we revisit the 260's before ex div, but did not want to increase my position further at this stage.

Not sure I trust the improved market/macro sentiment. But would be happy to be wrong. GLA.