Member Info for LWHL

Well, if you are bullish on the future of the company, then take advantage and pick up those shares on such drops - and avoid trading on margin, I guess.

That way, they cannot activate your stop loss so easily, because if you are trading on margin, and presumably in many cases, therefore somewhat over-leveraged, then your stops are going to necessitate being more tightly set than if you hold a more sensible sized position, IMO.

That is naturally my concern too. Volatile, even by recent standards, here.

Anyway, GLA fellow holders....

I have set a buy order in the low 370's. Did not expect such a swift return to this level, but this one always keeps you off guard, so in that sense, not a complete surprise, either!

Could just as easily regain the 50 DMA shortly, as break lower IMO.

The only thing predictable in this one is its utterly unpredictability. GLA.

Nope. Just an opportunity for some to exit/reduce on the short lived spike.

IG do not lend customer shares to shorts without consent, either. Nor A J Bell, I think.

Anyway, GLA for another week in this high risk (but hopefully high reward) share.

Yep. Fair play to the longs here. And to the BOD, for those inside buys.

I did not think the bottom was in yet...but as soon as Mary posted she had entered, I should have accepted I was wrong about that! Good weekend all.

Well, whatever it is, hopefully sooner rather than later, to put this to bed now.

Nothing in the SP action this week to suggest good news for holders is coming, although I guess it has not entirely crashed either, so there is a sliver of hope still in market sentiment, perhaps.

Monday for an offer or no offer clarification, please JD. You have had long enough now.

My small punt here (neither added to, nor sold) is with eyes fully open, and was not influenced by that CVA comment JD made, whatsoever.

All that said, if he did renege on it now, then that would put him in the same bin as the many dodgy CEO's that litter the world of the AIM markets, to my mind.

But business is not about emotion. In simple commercial/financial terms, I think a CVA would be more expensive for him personally, as well as for the company, than buying the rest of the outfit out of his own pocket if needs be. Assuming he does genuinely think it still has legs. Which at the time of print, is a reasonable conclusion to draw, IMO.

Not long to find out, either way. GLA.

IMO it would have to be an outstanding beat to explode to the upside. Especially in this market.

I have done very well trading this one - the most trades in a single stock for me, ever - and I have only been here for a fairly short period of time.

There is potentially quite a lot to be bullish about (although the jury is out on the BOD, for me), but I really cannot see that level of rapid upside here - again to reassert the point - in this market, even if the update is very good.

But if it happens, and I am on the sidelines, then I will be happy for you and fellow PI's, and will share your enjoyment of watching the short squeeze unfold :)

That would be a serious gamble and not one that I would look to take. Certainly not if the SP continues to rise strongly into the update.

Should the opposite happen, then a different matter. If you look at a broad range of company charts leading into updates - not sector specific, pretty much any of them - if you have seen a strong rise, then unless the update beats, you usually get a sell off (sell the news) pattern. Even small beats get sold off quite often, I have found. And the opposite pattern often too. Even fairly big misses, when a SP has sold off heavily in the preceding weeks for example, you sometimes get a bounce, confounding logic.

Keep an eye on those US regional banks. IMO, one of several potential 'black swans' right now that can blow the doors off the equity markets. BTFP etc. Could be an issue, come 11th March, or could be a nothing burger as our friends across the Pond say.

Completely agree - it could be one that sails away into the distance.

While I naturally hope that I get the chance to return, I will be back to post my congratulations if the update is strong and I miss the boat.

And I may well jump back in again if we see a retrace prior to that update. This one has been very good to me.

Hopefully a steady rise - and hold - above 4 quid now, although I have decided to take profits on the 185p ones today.

Simply because we have seen this action before, and with the next update getting close, any disappointments and IMO it is going to get slammed again.

Needless to say, it remains very much on my watch list. GLA.

Well done. I am surprised that the SP did not at least consolidate around that rise. With hindsight, I would have sold up too and bought back in lower tranches. Never mind. Will add more if we go all the way back to the mid 22's, although having a fair lot of these already, I would rather not have the chance! GLA.

Well done to those shareholders who seem to have taken this action.

IMO, you could not be much worse off under this leadership, so might as well have a proper clear out here.

IMO, and from looking afar, the CEO and the other directors have had long enough to deliver shareholder value.

The remuneration and lack of real inside buying, which is so common in this space...the hubris and dismissive behaviour, might finally be no more for this lot.

And hopefully then you holders can finally get some reward for your investment, patience and the risk you have taken.

GLA. Fingers crossed for positive news soon. I simply cannot make head nor tail of the SP action here. Big buys late in the day, but little movement. Those RNS's show JD is increasing his position (or am I wrong about that?)

What will be, will be. Good weekend all.

I appreciate that, but the window for them to buy has not been closed for the entire time that they have been in their roles.

And I know from similar outfits that even with decent inside buying, things can still go bust.

At least you feel a BOD is aligned with fellow shareholders. That they are taking some financial risk as well.

As to the risk that Staclica is taking...I simply cannot see that they would try and 'pull a fast one' in the event that they felt the product was effective for their plans.

I appreciate that greed is commonplace in business, but that would be lunacy. As to their website: perhaps they have not updated it yet?

I guess we will find out soon enough and I wish you and your fellow holders well. That still includes me, to a small extent now, with a rump holding mentally resigned to becoming a tax loss at some point, unless a miracle occurs.

IMO the BOD here would not have released that RNS without having first exhausted discussions with Staclica. I mean, it is a pretty nuclear option to take!

If we see an RNS detailing significant inside purchases from Huw and his colleagues, then it might add some credibility to the thesis that the product is actually of some value.

As things stand, when you consider all the other problems historically, the Juv farce etc...this one looks to me like it has just about run out of road. Another classic AIM lifestyle outfit. GLA.

Regardless, that RNS is all that matters. One issue too many for me. GLA.

I thought you had a million shares, Mary?

It took me some time to get a quote for even 2000 shares (was not getting anywhere with a buy order). 10K shares in total now. Small position, but as much as I am willing to risk here.

Not looking to go in as big as you and Mary have here, but it would be nice if this one does make me a profit at some point. Banish the demons of my historic loss here. Or compound the irritation, of course. GLA.