Member Info for LWHL

Given it is now late July, I would have expected them to know by now if they were going to be cash flow positive by the end of this calender year.

But given the track record of the company, it is not that much of a surprise, lol.

Perhaps this will be the time where you will see significant inside buying from several of the BOD?

GLA anyway.

If they achieve that kind of performance (which I am backing them to do currently), then I am likely to simply continue to hold, because dividends might come into the equation again.

To be clear, a fairly long way off, if at all, and debt reduction continues to be of primary importance to me, and we might get bought before then anyway.

And potential bumps in the road etc, so not a recommendation to buy etc.

No....I am not letting you get away with that accusation.

Anyone who cares to, can read my posting history.

There are of course some obvious rampers and de-rampers on these chat boards, but I have said nothing that can credibly fit into either category, and if you want, I can list you a bunch of small caps that did indeed multibag over the course of several days, or several weeks, that happened just in the past couple of years, some of which did so on little more than thin air.

So your sentence about them not having anything that could lead to such a spike in SP is wrong, insofar as it could be entirely irrelavant to what might drive such activity - and more to the point, who are you to say with certainty that they will not have anything to share with the market in the next few weeks that could drive a spike in the SP from some material news?

I have no idea either way on this front. Do you?

I think you are being deliberately obtuse and misreading some comments on purpose.

Everyone is responsible for their own investment decisions and I never recommend anyone buy or sell anything, be it a mature mega cap or a nano cap punt.

Well, it was a pretty good day here today. Especially considering the rise we have had.

I expected a small red day if anything, for this reason, although was/am satisfied with the update.

Still lots to do, but IMO progress is happening. And if they continue on this course, then I think we will be out of the penny shares category once again, if we do not get a bid before that point. See where things stand by autumn. GLA.

Cautiously optimistic, given the SP action throughout the day and how the chart looks... GLA.

Certainly never a dull moment with this one, Mary!

Yeah. Adequate to satisfactory, IMO.

Which is a material improvement on what we have got used to seeing in these updates.

Has this already been priced in? I am looking for a close above the 200 DMA today and tomorrow at least, to feel we are in with a chance of perhaps having a crack at the year high in the next few weeks.

Which in itself will be predicated on wider market sentiment playing nicely, IMO.

But as I have said in the past, this one does its own thing (I certainly never seem to call short term moves accurately in this name!) and I doubt this is going to change now :) GLA.

The point is, it could easily multibag in just a few short weeks or so - a not uncommon experience on AIM stocks, regardless of how advanced the business is.

That is the attraction of the nano cap space for some investors and traders.

Years to become a mature business, if it will indeed become so - but I was not suggesting years to multibag, to be clear.

Not saying it certainly will see multiples from here either. Because not all of these ones do.

But if it does, I am sure I will not be the only one here who will take some off the table and leave a free carry to run. In case it does end up being one of the special rarities.

And before then, if they do start delivering the goods, then I will also consider averaging up. But one step at a time. GLA.

That is exactly the type of play here.

IMO, anyone looking for less than a bag, should probably not consider outfits like this one.

Realistically, a good deal more than simply that too - because the downside risk is also not inconsiderable, including, as you say, a possible bust. So got to be a decent risk/reward ratio, to my mind.

But so far, and unlike another of this type of punt I am currently in, I have been cautiously impressed with the BOD here.

Whether it leads to an eventual mature company that is profitable in its own right, or bought out by a big player, will require a few years at least to find out.

Which is part of the allure of the nano cap space.

Not advice in any direction, naturally. GLA.

Adequate update. Want to see some decent inside buying now, to show the current price range is too low.

Otherwise, sticking with the small position I already have. GLA.

I toyed with reducing my core holding (at a loss) earlier this week, but decided to leave it alone.

Might regret that decision, but I concluded that having backed the CEO a while ago to turn the ship around, as this stance was unchanged, then to sit tight.

Fingers crossed and see where we are on Tuesday... GLA.

Gap fill will be one target, but I suspect most here are looking for a lot more than even that, let alone just 6%, lol.

I certainly am, albeit not with the current full allocation that I hold.

But happy for you :) GLA.

Been in and out a few times myself with this name.

Originally with a LTH plan, but with this CEO, I decided a while ago to take profits and change the strategy.

Anyway, while tempted to take another spin in the 1300's, with results due out soon, I have decided to wait and see.

Especially as IMO the chart looks like it wants to go lower. Maybe a new five year low type range.

Might not get there, in which case, GLA.

You yourself seem to have changed your tune on this stock.

Which is fine of course, but your post comes across as bitter, IMO.

You have bulls and you have bears. Some are no doubt playing one side, while pitching the other. And vice versa. So what?

You will also have plenty of straight up individuals posting genuine ideas and opinions with no particular agenda.

If this was crashing while similar names were rocketing, that would be (IMO) a credible cause for potential concern.

But at the time of print, this is reacting with the market and this particular element of this retail space. It is no outlier.

Apart from the size of CEO purchase perhaps.

I have some more buy orders in the pipes. Should they hit, I will post accordingly. Not advice etc. GLA.

I am a willing student of them. A million miles off being anywhere near 'qualified' enough to offer TA opinions that are worthy of attention.

But I do feel sufficiently qualified to suggest that TA does not generally work/apply to small caps like this one.

While I knew this, I took a small punt and nevertheless played the TA game here.

So far, very much a case of play stupid games, win stupid prizes, lol.

Lots of TA material in the public domain, if you are interested in learning about it.

While it obviously offers no 100% certainties, all I can say is, in my experience, when applied to 'proper' outfits, it has improved my own performance in the stock market by quite some margin.

So I recommend looking into it, albeit nothing more than that...and never forget, your money, your wins or losses. All on you alone.

Thank you both for that.

So, long enough for some further potential volatility here.

The lack of inside buying after the last update led to my decision to significantly reduce what had become a fairly big position in my p/f at one time.

Glad not to have seen solid profits evaporate, although equally compelled to keep a few in the tank, in case the great author does make YOU great again :)

VIX has come off its earlier highs somewhat, although IMO that chart remains 'bullish' at the time of print. GLA.

2.74% short interest at declaration level now.

And proof once again that a HODL strategy rarely pays off.

Do we know the date of the next update?

Yeah. I'm thinking therefore 298p-ish.

Needless to say, it may not happen and not trying to spread FUD etc.

That is what I am trying to calculate. Would it not be the difference between the peak of the 'M' and the break of the neckline? So subtracting those numbers should equate to approximately where some traders might jump on, or close shorts?

Am going to watch the action and see if this kind of price action plays out. Not familiar enough with this type of pattern to confidently call a price.

Unlike eg a cup and handle.

Same here, mate. But then I'm thinking if we see 310-ish, then a break below that might 'verify' this M pattern, which I cannot shake off seeing right now.

Fully accept this is perhaps an entirely wrong read, and so I might well miss the boat to add down here.

But I remain on the sidelines for now, except for the small remaining stake I hold.

Will post if this changes, if not, GLA until the next update, or spicy SP movement.