Member Info for LWHL

Ah, those generous C-suite options. At least they have some performance criteria attached to them, unlike some other outfits.

As if their compensation is not already quite hefty!

Hey ho. It is what it is and no change of opinion from me on this name and my targets here etc.

Still pi££es me off though. Good weekend all.

That would be logical, if he bought back in again around a quid.

I have bought a few more, toying with the idea of then keeping some back in case we get a proper SP appreciation. Still pondering that at present. Current target circa 115p myself and unchanged since I think I first mentioned it.

Subject to the usual caveats, naturally. GLA.

IMO we need to break above the 109p ish level before we could potentially entertain such an idea.

And even then, never forget the saying about what assumptions tend to make of us :)

Hopefully we can get back above the 50 DMA, and have another crack at the 80's in the next few weeks.

With the dividend not looking overstretched (fingers crossed of course), IMO this one still offers good potential capital appreciation on top of a near 9% yield.

Had a buy order earlier in the week that just failed to hit, but hopefully I will not get the chance to add in the 60's now. GLA.

I presume that he closed out his other, earlier trades here. Both presumably for small losses (if he stuck with his stop losses as listed).

Anyway, what is his target for this new position?

I have no idea if this is a bid target, but as I said before, this feels like a good range to potentially accumulate IMO. Time will tell though of course. GLA.

97.45 and 97.82 at the time of print (moving averages of course).

From a technical perspective, it has been quite a battle the last week or so.

While I would generally say it would be bullish to close above those moving averages and hold above for a couple of days at least, given we have some key economic data due later from across the Pond, I am only focusing on that in the short term.

I also added a few yesterday before that RNS (although less than you and the insider did).

Some key economic data across the Pond later, so took fewer than I might otherwise have done, but that 110p-112p level was simply too compelling to pass up, IMO.

And if events that are not company-specific see this revisit year lows in the next few weeks or so, I will likely add further. GLA.

If there was/is genuine value in Dundas, then why has nobody taken it off JAY's hands yet, or agreed a JV?

It has indeed been many years now and more questions than answers about the whole thing, IMO.

For anyone new to this company, whose attention has been drawn to this latest RNS, please do some careful research into the historic Dundas stuff (and everything else). If it leaves you feeling positive, well, I have no answer to that. Your money your choice either way.

For anyone else just looking at this as a possible quick trend trade, then fair enough. You know the rules of the greater fool theory...

Anyway, I guess still no news on those various asset sales/disposals yet. GLA.

Well, you might get a little spike from this update, and I am waiting to see if this chat board gets a bunch of rampy posts in the days ahead, but IMO it is not transformational material.

The company has issued loads of these types of scientific updates over the years. Unless it is quickly followed up by a JV of some sort with a quality pharma name, or a new funding partner to cover all the costs of progressing this, then so what?

I appreciate that this post probably comes across as quite terse, but I genuinely think we have seen this story before and for me, it simply does not change a thing.

If it was Stal resolution news for example, and agreement of payment on the terms as initially outlined, then my post would be different.

Anyway, good luck to those of you who feel differently. And this is AIM, so you might get a nice spin on the fruit machine of SP movement here for a bit, regardless of this. Which is what I think some of you are plumping for and know this to be and nothing more, in all probability.

And that is fine too. You either make money in the market or lose it. Everything else is simply noise.

I seem to remember it being tipped in the DM I think it was, a couple of years ago.

I would be delighted if this tip gets us back up to 40p or so again.

And then I will do what I should have done after the last classic AIM pump - and dump it all myself.

Unless it is built on something that actually merits calling this a credible investment, in which case I may remain an investor here.

Full disclosure: I have unloaded a few (at a loss). So I most certainly am not looking to buy back cheaper etc :) GLA.

I doubt it is a distressed seller. More likely someone that has had enough, and wants to deploy their capital in a potentially more effective fashion, than this name has offered for some time now.

Or forward selling perhaps? I cannot remember if we were given guidance on how long the funds from the last raise would last.

Only been following this one sporadically for a little while now. When RNS material is published basically.

It is following the reliable trend of dropping below a placing price (almost there anyway, at the time of print).

Surprised it did not happen sooner to be honest, but either way, I think we have an earnings update due in mid/late August, so I will probably just wait for that and then take a view. GLA.

That was probably the most dramatic AIM pump of all time. And at least it was based on some degree of rationale at the time.

SNG was a pretty good example of right place right time hopium too. Look at it now.

In fact, this is one of the only ones of that sector that has never had a real AIM classic move. Which tells its own story, perhaps.

Meanwhile, radar pretty much sums it up for this name.

No new deals since the Stal deal (that now looks like not even being a deal). Similar to Juv. An absolute lifestyle outfit, of which evidence to the contrary is far outweighed by supporting evidence.

None of which means that we might not get a pump at some point, but that is blind gambling, not investing, and quite frankly, even longer odds for this name than similar micro-scruffs, if we are being honest about it. Hey ho.

A common theme and anguished sentiment of 99% of AIM investors, ridgtile. Been there myself, too many times in truth!

AIM is for trading only and always with extreme care IMO.

Anyway, this is not the worst AIM name by a long margin, but it remains to be seen if we can join the 1% of AIM names that do not destroy shareholder wealth.

It is not just the frauds and those run by fools that achieve this dubious honour.

Sometimes very good companies with very good management go the way of the dinosaur too (unforeseen bad luck or timing etc).

I am still moderately hopeful here, but as I, and others have said before, right now, it is all about cash runway and if we will start generating sufficient revenue streams to leave cash raises in the past.

If we can, then hopefully good profits and perhaps one day dividends too. Long way off right now though, IMO. GLA.

I did not get a chance to watch it. Hopefully they will upload it, so others can watch it on catch up.

I was hoping to trim a few if mid 70's had hit before ex div, but not bothered either (that it likely will not do so now).

Not a perfect stock, trading at a steal right now, but plenty to still like IMO.

So, like you, I am neither a buyer or seller here, but a fairly happy and fairly relaxed holder. Famous last words, lol :)

Thank you, Mrmarkyw. It is refreshing not to be accused of trying to spread FUD, or 'looking to get in cheaper' whenever you post anything that does not declare that company X is going to the moon, lol.

In fairness, 95% of posters are fine, but, as in real life, you get a few total weapons too.

Anyway, hopefully we all manage to make a profit here (and elsewhere), whatever our respective targets are. GLA.

Yes, of course. That would make it frothy on fundamentals right now, but it could happen even without further company growth IMO. On the basis that stocks overshoot and undershoot regularly.

But they would have to demonstrate some strong, additional growth, for me to retain my position here beyond 140p or so.

I have my actual target exit price written down, but not to hand - but it is whatever I first said it was back when I first commented here, so is unchanged in that time.

That is separate to the trading tranche, which is lower. Naturally, taking neither for granted, subject to the usual caveats, not advice etc etc.

I have been watching this one for a while. Subject to the obvious caveats, I think this is a good name to have in a p/f around these prices. Although, I would not rule out us seeing historic SP support levels lower down either, before a reverse.

So I have taken a couple of tranches from buy orders that hit this morning and have a couple more in the pipes, should we revisit low 90's.

Had a couple of buy orders around 96p, which annoyingly did not hit, so had to settle for some in the 97's.

Looking for circa 115p or so, but in a GFC-type event, I will probably hold for a much bigger share price. GLA.

I have closed out my position over a couple of tranches. The dreaded gut feel, rather than anything else based on valuable insight, lol.

Could easily just be a healthy retrace before kicking on from here. And now I am out, the SP is almost certainly going to fly north!

If I do not get the chance to return, then good luck to those remaining holders. I hope the next update is good and you make a packet.

Why past £6 in particular? I see some potential resistance around mid-460's, possibly some at the (entirely irrational) 5 quid round number, then perhaps 520's-ish.

IMO, not much point in looking further ahead than that right now, and only if you are doing so with a technical trade in mind (neither here nor there to those with a LTH view).

I do not think if it breaks 6 quid, it will then race to eg 8 quid or more. Probably need 650's for that prospect, I think.

Anything is possible of course, but I think you will need a very positive update for that type of action to occur.

IMO and as I think I said before, the market might need to see at least a couple of good updates to 'forgive' the company.

In the meantime, the market will give us a range and if we are lucky, a good range to trade. For those of us who like to do so of course :) GLA.

Solid start this morning. IMO a lot of stops will have been hit when we breached the 200 this morning. So a potentially healthy mini pull back, before the next attack on the 200.

If we can at least close above the 50 today, then that could bode very well for next week.

Might have some new investors take up positions next week too, after more people have had the chance to follow/digest the recent broker note over the weekend.