Member Info for LowiePete

Can we rest this now?

Especially as there's far more exciting stuff to mull over...

Follow the money?

Can someone explain how a US listing is going to help those LTHs who the company acknowledge, with little acclaim or sorrow, have so far been royally fleeced?

it's surprising this opened 0.0025 up this morning, so MMs had a field day with those early panic sellers. For a moment, I began to think I should have joined them, but I held firm... I wonder for much longer it'll stay under 0.1p?

What I meant in my last post is that SGS are _canny_ fundraisers, and they clearly believed in the outcome of their PII trial. So, that would place them in a good position to hold their shares for a good price once the licensing bids come in. I say bids because, with wide appeal, I'm assuming that AZ may not be the only bidders(?) Another bit that isn't clear. :/

The guess has to be at what price SGS would sell at, and at what rate...

However, as holders of 1.1bn shares until Friday, they nevertheless are/were investors in Vela.

As I gather, they now need to raise more funds to go to phase III, they're not going to sell their 0.1p shares for 0.085p or less are they? Surely, it'd be better for them to wait for the licensing deal terms and see where that takes the Vela price, especially where they are placed in terms of dealing with potential licensees.

I don't see any words of compulsion for them to sell at the end of the lock-in. Investors they might not be, but for sure they are fundraisers!

Having had a chance to recover a little from the shock of Friday, I'm hoping that I've now got a clearer picture in my mind. I'm assuming that the ongoing situation is that SGS have a load of warrants that have a sell-by date, but that selling outright might not be n their best interests. So, they are the buyers back-in, because they're also in for the longer haul just like us PIs.

I'm guessing they are even better placed to _want_ to be back in because of their knowledge of potential licensing deals. So, Monday will most likely be a black morning while the warrants conversion continues, though it could become blue sky in the afternoon as that completes. My further assumption is that it's the next RNS that is the most vital as that will give us the extent of interest by the licensee.

I guess the judgement is how serious the drop will be and its duration, oh and is it worth the risk from this point?
Could it be better to lower my APS if price drops low enough?

Am I far off? GLA!

I wonder how much it could GAIN on bad news ? :/

with some outfits, think goose and golden egg - the skill (luck) is in matching them...

The lesson I learned yonks ago is to look for all the dates on the page _before_ you start getting drawn in to what could be no more than click-bait. With all of the faked stuff around, it saves a lot of time...

There's a few messages here with confusing content, with scary remarks like "before the drop" - is that news or price drop?

Just been watching on goooogly and the price is very bouncy - not sure all those sells are true. If people see what's reported here and are basing their trading decisions upon it, then teapots and chocolate come to mind. To think, that LSE hope to encourage people to _pay_ - must do better!

Done my bit of adding, only for it to show as a sell, at wrong price. Whatever price LSE paid for this software, they wuz robbed!

Question is: Is it the _same_ HNWI, or a small group of them? Either way, following the money seems a pretty good tactic. HNWIs don't often end up broke overnight...

a spread of 0.4 creates a sea of red to scare the unwary. For a brief while today it was at 0.1, but then it was a sea of blue. Makes you wonder whether MMs are selling for whatever they can get, or quietly amassing for when the RNS we await does actually land...

Well, it's jumped from my watch list to my "bunce" list. Top-sliced a portion of my 100% gain out of SAR and splashed it out on VELA . I'm not sure I'll make another 100% as quickly, but as it's a "Rockefeller" investment - use money to make money, preferably other people's - I'm happy to let it sit a while. Summat tells me it might be a good move...

Doesn't that require some crystal-ball gazing? This is becoming a case of how far the "could" can, or cannot, be predicted, whereas with dilution there is no going back. Needs a stronger argument than that, I feel...

Sorry, but I'm not sure that you have put both sides of the argument. From a BoD member's point of view, you cover their position as if it were your own. However, the fact remains that fundraising by share issuance is not altogether in the shareholders' best interest. He / she has to top up at vastly inflated rates, just to contain a position. In plain English, that's pay up, just to stand still! It also sums up the basic risk we take investing in penny shares on AIM.

So, we're being asked to vote to allow the BoD to go on a spending-spree, but I remain to be convinced that I should add my vote to approve the proposals. I voted against last time and I expect you know where I'm heading.

Remember: 1 million times nothing = nothing!! The very definition of dilution...

I'm not sure that the nay-sayers have a complete grasp of the impact that 5G is going to have in helping this company reach what it is aiming for. It comes down to two words - quality sells!

+1
The further this share falls, the more polarised and emphatic some of the views get. Meanwhile, I've just done another cheeky top-up that helps bring my average down a tad. While I'm as miffed as anybody over the CV19 effects, particularly on live music, I think this hiatus is probably being used to good effect.

The one thing the EVRH / MVR traded upon was bringing "quality" over quantity to the show. That's not easy in good times, but not losing sight of that in bad times takes some guts! It'll be quality that pays, it always does, so if NAPS can also forge a good reputation with both music and theatre, these paltry SP tokens will become gold-plated!

I'm in no hurry... yet.

I wonder if the "Napster" bit is also an auto input? Are the pages put together by typing out the HTML, or does the content get "assembled" from standard attributes updated from a "database" in one place? To me, the whole thing looks like a beggar's muddle.