Member Info for LowiePete

I don't have any particular target, other than to see no further devaluation in CIZ shares. That gets more important the closer to market the company gets. I wonder when or if there'll be a bit of FOMO activity ahead of the merger..?

The "unknown" trade is my latest little top-up. Overall, that trade brings my APS to 2.0052p which I think is a bargain. When the price climbed to double that on not much more than sentiment, I'd resigned myself to holding fewer than half-a-million as 2p had been my self-imposed purchase limit. Now I have managed to double my holding and still not gone much above that limit, but now I have a lovely trading buffer to do some slicing with.

I guess that we're all assuming that the next climb will only be on more concrete news. On that basis, I doubt there'll be a drop back to these levels once more. Pie in the sky thinking?

I reckon he should sue his financial advisor for negligence! He, or she, clearly didn't put him through a proper "aversion to risk" test and now we have to suffer the consequences :(

Just did a cheeky top-up, like I said I would. Now about 185k over my initial target, so it gives me a nice top-slice cushion when the time comes.

It's only when you filter you begin to realise just what your not missing. I wonder who is paying him to present himself as being that dumb, and will enough filters get him kicked off altogether? There aren't enough problems in the World, yeah right. Maybe we were being duped by an incomplete AI bot..?

No, that's hearsay. Just like the cause of the price doubling in the month or so before this drop.

No-one is that pleased at the drop, although as it gets cheaper there's a bigger pile to gather. I'm going to make hay while the funds allow, as I believe in the aims and direction of this company. Someone who gets angry at others when clearly it's his own fault really needs to be shown the way out...

I'll ask again, where is your evidence?

Who says we're being taken for a ride by the BoD? Where is your evidence?

The facts don't bear that out one bit! So, there's a delay here and there. However, when you look closely, the delays are because of outside influences not within the control of the BoD, or any of its individual members. Some things just move at a snail's pace; c'est la vie!

Getting angry at everyone over nothing doesn't cast this board in a good light. It just shouts unmitigated desperation! Prices go up, prices come down. First rule of investing: don't part with money you cannot afford to lose.

No-one else is to blame for which crocks of gold you wish to chase...

@neil - me too!

There is nothing tangible to suggest that all is not heading in the right direction. Well, unless you're daft enough to class the SP as tangible, of course. At anything below 2p this share is a steal, so my raiding the piggy-bank to round-up my holding is being actively pursued. ;)

GreenD - perhaps I'm now too cynical; it doesn't look like they have much incentive and they do have "form"

was gonna say the same thing - MMs did their last-minute top-up to actually have something to sell.
Monday morning will probably be good entertainment to watch...

...and there woz me thinkin t'woz only on 't AIM that stuff got corrupted... ;)

1 off x 10k here - been doing this quite regularly for some while.
Started at very first drop to 3.2p, now with an avg of 1.85.
Actually, I can barely believe I've amassed so many - well, not in mega terms, but still purty healthy...

I hope the science wins out on this one - it could be ripe for "burial" as it threatens sales of big-bucks meds.

Hello fellow speculators,
Seems I'm not the only one wondering about our "Mr. Lang", especially if as some have suggested, he happens to live in, or be from, a country whose name sounds a little fragile when dropped. So here's my 2p worth.

I've always had a niggling doubt about involvement of described country as their reputation over respecting patents is not good! Now, I am just speculating here, but what if the patents don't give details of actual reactive ingredients? Not a lot of point in trying to rip them then, so what's an alternative?

Well, go to the central funding source and persuade them to buy loadsashares, but not in their name! Could be tail wagging the dog or vice versa, but outcome is the same. A huge interest in this company is achieved and loadsamoney made with no ripped patents in sight. Not us guv! Quite what influence buying so many shares brings is moot, but could also not be in best interests of fellow shareholders.

There is one other niggle bothering me. While I am hoping to make a mint, I do believe in the science. However, I'm equally dubious about the behaviour and worsening reputation of the big players, (them wot rhymes with farmer). I'm assuming that when they offer treatments for cancers in later stages there's some very big-bucks to be charged!

So, along comes a tiny outfit whose sole goal is to give people better outcomes but which also threatens a huge drop in their top-dog drugs income, and, they'll probably claim, risk to money for further research. I'm thinking of just what a tragedy it would be for them to buy out the minnow and just let it die, quietly. Would you put it past them?

In this day and age, "powerful" seems to have more connotations with "frightening" than anything else! At what point does this guy get too powerful? Should we lesser mortals start to worry that at some point he'll throw his weight around in a way we might not like?

RNS there might be, but is there any indication the guy has stopped buying?

Strange that the only share with no less than 2 RNS releases this morning still has the same bid price, yet others in my grasp have risen. I just wish I had the funds to buy more here, but a well-known oil company insists on my paying them extraordinary amounts for my power :(

I'd say that £400k, give or take £10k is plenty confidence! For a change it looks like the money followed me, rather than t'other way round. Though, following the money does give some confidence, eh? ;)

I would have been on that list of stay at this price CH, and I share your surprise. However, if the price stays below 2p for a while, I'll probably delve a little deeper, same topslice, but bigger windfall on the remainder. I'm now not fussed either way, but I'm aware of the pitfalls of being greedy. GLA

If memory serves, CIZ did some substantial horse-trading at this gathering in the past. Is anyone half expecting another RNS to drop as a result of this year's trip? With an almost giveaway SP at the moment, I've been adding bits and pieces to the point where I can now do some top-slicing and still have a fair few in the ring to gather the big bucks when they come. The ambition, having come in at over 3p, was to get below 2p avg, so I'm ever closer yet to getting to profit . Maybe not long to wait...

>> BoD clear out at the next AGM on the cards I reckon!
Good luck with that. Seems not too many shareholders are willing to back that call with action when it matters...

When you look at the voting with that in mind, it seems such a lonely place to be.

Slowly dropping my APS, I got my latest top-up on NT, but a v long wait!

THG - calls for changes to the BoD fall on deaf ears. Where it matters is when PIs cast their AGM ballots. Yet the paucity of votes to support such plans means that either no-one supports your view, or that their vote is a waste of time. It seems that maybe I wasn't the only one disappointed at the results, when in previous ballots we did temporarily make the BoD wake up from their almost perpetual snoozing.

In modern times, people seem to think they can somehow work the system by "tactical" voting. That's actually nonsense! The way to vote is exactly how you feel, no matter how else you think others may, or may not, vote. In a "majority wins" vote , the _only_ way to get towards the outcome you seek is to express your _own_ opinion. Seems that could work elsewhere too...