Member Info for longtimeinvestor

Rog

''You got it wrong. The 4.4 raise was used straight away, so not held as cash on books. It was only cash I was referring to

9 million £ in Sept 2025 audited accounts, now a total of 8.15 million left in unaudited accounts. Which means £850,000 spent in just over 3 months''

??

I don't get things wrong - '' £850,000 spent in just over 3 months''

The recently raised money has been spent

75% of my shares at a little under £144 which I was already holding virtually for free, and now obviously taken a big profit. Have been shareholder for many years. It will be interesting to see where it goes from here with the American listing coming up

LTI

''they would include money spent evaluating their sites as an asset (about £4 million?)''

Actually over £6 million hase been entered as exploration and evaluation 'assets'

LTI

''they would include money spent evaluating their sites as an asset (about £4 million?)''

Actual over £6 million have been entered as exploration and evaluation 'assets'

Fell

''the current market cap is around 30% lower than the companies worth (Cash plus audited asset value)''

audited?

Met1 - ''valuation at 31 December 2025 (unaudited)''

btw they would include money spent evaluating their sites as an asset (about £4 million?)- better to look at tangible assets.

Rog

'' see cash reserves down from 9 million (September 2025 audited accounts) to 8.15 million (13 Jan 2026 unaudited).

Just how much are they paying themselves ? £850,000 gone in 3 months''

??

They have just raised £4 million - ie after September

DCB

You decided to donate £40 to the charity chosen by the winner of the 2024 EOY comp - end of

You entered the 2025 EOY comp, which means you are obliged to pay to the charity chosen by the winner of the 2025 EOY comp - end of

You owe £20 to the 2025 charity.

RJ

I have not made a profit until my total returns exceed my expenditure . I could have sold all of my shares for about a 60% profit buy decided to still retain a very good number of shares virtually for free.

Bow

You lost the plot - get with it.

I mentioned BRWM months ago as a proper mining investment as opposed to the gamble of the non mining Met1.

The price of Met1 at the time of my proper mining investment was about 7.5p.

Just closing the chapter, highlighting the different outcomes between the two.

Meanwhile I now hold a lot of shares in BRWM at virtually no cost

Causing a little dip in price - could be beneficial for those wishing to reinvest the dividend payable on Wednesday

60% of my shares at a little under 922p leaving my remaining shares at virtually for free.

I still currently hold RIO and BHP as individual stocks as well, which I have held for quite a number of years, which are also going well.

Only 5 months go - very tempting to take a profit of near 60%

Need a lot more entries to make it worthwhile - I suppose many have sold up and lost interest,. You have a non shareholder disruptor (DCB ) on your entry list who has yet to pay his £20 due for 2025

LTI

'8 Jan 2026 22:49

Dt

''I did suggest to you not to go in circles - big mistake''

DT

STOP your C rap - and now removing posts

If the share prices rises quickly to 120p (in the next 12 months) and someone posts this observation are you then going to reply ' NO it has taken over 17 years' and the same for 140p 160p etc ?

we all know we are at all time share price highs - your resentfulness is clear

HSBC had risen quickly to over £12, are you going to say, no it has taken 35 years?

STOP being childish GROW UP ffs

dt

you are saying that lloyds has been at all time high share price.

we all ******* know that idiot

DT

''When was the first time, since LBG formed 17 years ago, did the Share Price reached £..?''

your brain is misfiring - we have been at all time highs for Lloyds just as HSBC has been at all time highs.

What is is about a swift increase to 100p for Lloyds and £12 for HSBC did you not understand

DT

STOP your C rap - and now removing posts

If the share prices rises quickly to 120p (in the next 12 months) and someone posts this observation are you then going to reply ' NO it has taken over 17 years' and the same for 140p 160p etc ?

we all know we are at all time share price highs - your resentfulness is clear

HSBC had risen quickly to over £12, are you going to say, no it has taken 35 years?

STOP being childish GROW UP ffs

DT

STOP your C rap - and now removing posts

If the share prices rises quickly to 120p (in the next 12 months) and someone posts this observation are you then going to reply ' NO it has taken over 17 years' and the same for 140p 160p etc ?

we all know we are at all time share price highs - your resentfulness is clear

HSBC had risen quickly to over £12, are you going to say, no it has taken 35 years?

STOP being childish GROW UP ffs