RE: Investors Fundraising14 Mar 2022 12:27
Hi Mirasol,
I have thought the same, why would anyone keep RKH on board, why not just take them out, however, RKH have been around a long time and Sam has the ear of FIG, so it would be silly to get rid of them IMHO, for now at least.
And as for holding up the future development with cash calls, diluting us to oblivion, I don't see that either. Once Navitas are signed,
"The proposals continue to materially satisfy Rockhopper's proportion of both pre-FID and post-FID costs for Sea Lion"
So we may get a cash call/fund raise after the signing but with a significantly higher share price, but it should be minimal, if OM result does not drop. Then there is the matter of holding up future development, well if we work on a 40k barrel per day development, that gives 14k per day to us, that's almost 5m barrels per year. If we say we clear a conservative $25 per barrel, that's $125m per year to RKH. Yes I know there will be tax to pay and royalties, but I cannot see RKH being at 20p per share when they are earning about 20p per share! These are just rough, back of the fag packet calcs, but they could fund their share of future dev costs from cash or loans against earnings as oil companies do, no need for further dilution once SL starts pumping IMHO.
LTT