Member Info for lejjb

Laks - with all due respect, I think your response is a bit too harsh. The news was certainly not good until this week's reversal - although "horrendous" was too strong a word IMO admittedly.

I don't think they have hit problems with the well itself, it's more that they misled us about how truly "ready" PVF would really be at the time of the DNR approval IMO.

80m more shares hitting the market... http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=UKOG&ArticleCode=8ib8ji64&ArticleHeadline=Loan_Conversion&ahc=fhifo5lj And good morning all!

It's probably KC's initial post (that probably posted just to poke people) that got deleted, meaning the whole thread was removed due to the technical limits of the BB. It didn't take much to rile people though, that post was just baseless rubbish that people just could not ignore...

Even a broken clock gets it right twice a day!

lastthrow - your near constant ramping (happy to be proven wrong) of this share, for years, peppered with what are effectively borderline claims of inside knowledge ("I have a strong feeling that news will be released / the sp will be at 5 by [specific time period]" combined with your status as the largest declared PI have more weight than anyone else saying "I'm feeling news will come soon") is irresponsible IMO. This may well have contributed to all the PIs who got spiked at the 1.70 - 1.80 earlier this year. I cannot even recall the last time you actually contributed on any board with had facts / info or provided a critical analysis of info provided by somebody else regarding this share. I hope for you (and other holders) that your wild quasi-gamble of putting what appears to be all your trading pot plus a large chunks of family savings in one single company whose BoD has been repeatedly disingenuous - there are AIM or small cap companies whose BoD generally stick to their promises. I treat my holding here as a quasi-gamble that will only be rewarded when a concrete deal is announced. In the meantime, I don't shout out the potential on the rooftops because I don't think it has much credibility until anything concrete (e.g. a BINDING contract with actual figures) is announced.

LastThrow - you come from the same school of drafting as NUOG I see! And considering I’ve written negatives and positives in recent weeks, out of the two of us there is only one with a clear bias here.

Monday is upon us!... But as T-Bone Walker points out, we have the rest of the week to look for too! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VAPDJheC0Jk

Well considering that Lastthrow, the biggest holder, claimed several times that a big RNS would be issued in the week before last and then disappeared, it is more likely that whoever else makes a timing commitment will be wrong and will have to eat his figurative hat too.

Have a great weekend - try extra dark chocolate: all the benefits for the brain's neuro receptors, none of the sugar addiction!... ;-)

LOL.

Hi boys (and gals?) - it's mad how the "1 code" trick still works at hooking in punters about 1/10 times, especially when everyone's on edge, and usually in combination with deliberate rumour spreading on Twitter. I've seen none of the latter today though.

Laks - you know that your last comment now calls for a mention of your famous bendiness!...

...and a merry Friday!

Once a few hundred million of those 611m-ish shares have been forward sold, this could be a good place for a trade methinks... but not before a few hundred millions have been cleared first. thoughts?

It’s not just you!

Well spotted. Actual link to the podcast here: https://audioboom.com/posts/6897022-interview-with-mick-hibbert-mfdevco It's purely about GH - strangely enough, it's an MFDevCo employee who's helping out PVF, not an NUOG member of staff!... It's a better podcast than earlier ones, with a more realistic description of the geology of GH and the challenges getting the oil out. However, it does not help the case of whoever wrote all the RNSs on GH claiming that things would proceed fast - it appears that there is a lot more work needed before the site becomes commercial.

Considering that the "(new) nomad approved" RNS contained at least one wrong claim (i.e. (1) that the flow test would start as soon as the DNR approval would be received, and (2) that the DNR approval was due to be received on the w/c 16 April*), I honestly don't trust anymore the reliability of the RNSs issued by NUOG. There is so far the weather argument can go IMO. The unreliability of the weather should have been factored in if they were half professional - and PVF are supposed to be oil specialists for NF! It's not like NUOG had made a deal with Saudi Aramco!! *admittedly the DNR may have adopted a much tougher than expected stance so that specific delay is not as bad IMO.

xoxo ;-)

Your guess is a good as anyone's! I do hope we will get a clear and detailed RNS update rather than the usual vague wordings that we have had so far. And no wrong timing promises this time.