Member Info for Lawrence13

Note all R brand once again fails to show how I've lied

No. So I met my local MP on Friday and she will inform Liz Truss

"Final point but best. Can anyone believe that someone who harps on daily about russian crooks has all his earthly money in one investment
A miner in you guessed it , in RUSSIA
NO, me neither."

I didn't start investing until 2012 before then I had no experience, but I did belive that gold was king in a global economy that was writing cheques it couldn't cash bar inflation. Outside of that I knew nothing and know very little now. I have some other investment but I went gung ho for POG and trusted Hambro and Pavel to deliver the goods after the earlier set backs. As for me "harping on" about Russian crooks, there were no Russian crooks until the BoD coup in the summer of 2020 when then the sp stood at 41p. By the time of the invasion 15p , so the SP had fallen drastically under Cameron, Denis, strukov, kharin and so on Doesn't take much working out , does it?

You get tired of my lies and yet you have never given me one example, not one.

Tiger, do you deliberately misspell names?

Tiger you recently chided me for understanding nothing yet here you are now displaying your ignorance as a johnny come lately carpet bagger.
The past is the key to POG's future when this current BoD took over in summer 2020 there were posts galore saying now things will be brilliant. Here's an example from a clown who called himself updown flat and has now &ucked off after spouting this nonesense

"updown flat

RE: Baby Steps26 Jan '21

Lawrence,
on the balance of probabilities, I think there is a higher chance that this is greater than 60p at the end of next year then sub 40p, like you suggest. Both are opinions, but I base mine on thought through drivers. Why don’t you tell us what calculations lead you to sub 40p?"

Of course he said that a month after Pavel was framed and banged up. No one, I mean no one saw the warning signs bar me. And how did that 60p forecast work out? Ah yes 15p just before the invasion. This company is subject to very powerful ruthless influences

Yes I saw the back and forth with Kenj. But my point was any reaction either way was very mild and after several days the whole thing was forgotten more or less.

I'll say one more thing: I was told that the stocken deal when struck in March 2020 wasn't binding at that time.

Rusty you still holding up and are you still in? Okay I would say that if Peter resigns once the strukov/lioustiger rot set in and becomes chair at IRC that company then turns around obviously it was pure coincidence that Peter happened to be there. He's gone now.

Absolutely Whosnext. I know Pavel in March 2020 announced the off loading of IRC and at the time bar a flurry of posts notably from Rusty Bucket and Kenj, most didn't know what to make of it or really care. There was NO ONE screaming foul play at that time . In fact Pavel and the BOD toyed with the idea of just selling it for a symbolic ten dollars just t lose the potential liability .

You buffoon. I never even mentioned the potential corruption

R Brand why did you even bother typing out all the drivel when the simple truth stares us all in the face, *ALL* charges, and that means *ALL* charges, were dropped against Pavel bar one and that was ridiculous allegation that he gained more money from the sale of his son's property than t6he market price. The valuation was carried out by Deloitte who carried out the on site survey. The accusers Strukov, Akimov, Lioustiger and co had their own valuation undertaken where the realtor or surveyor didn't even bother turning up.

Rbrand you must be getting paid by or working for the present BOD to keep blurting out such disprovable blatant lies

"Pavel stole IRC from us shareholders . What comes around, goes around?. I know Lawrence will be offended."

I can't believe some idiot actually recommended this lie.

I had to go back to March 2020 on the message board and iot took some time at 100 messages per page, I randomly read the odd comments here and there and came to this conclusion. 99% was inaccurate and pure wishful thinking . The only consistently correct poster was me !

"Well guys sinking ship promised to post the link and connect with me on telegram .

Guess what he didn’t .. bad karma making things up"

I am so shocked

Retired banker was Peter Hambro wtf are you on about

KRSS

I have delved back to the 18th March 2020 when the RNS to off load IRC was announced. I could not find one forum member who disagreed with it so stop lying man

"Pavel stole IRC from us shareholders . What comes around, goes around?. I know Lawrence will be offended."

That is taking the sale totally out of context. When it was announced in March 2020 no one batted an eye lid as IRC had been called for sometime by our own 'retired banker', a 'Basket Case'. It had limped along and was a millstone around POG's neck as we underwrote its loans. In fact Pavel and the BOD were thinking of just giving it away. As 2020 unfolded Strukov came on the scene with his new 21% acquisition worked in concert with Liuostiger who had demanded Cameron be employed in 2018 and the dye was cast. Just before the coup Peter Hambro resigned and became chair of IRC and ironically it began to improve rapidly. Also when the sale finally came to happen last autumn a whole year had gone by with IRC becoming healthier by the day and the present BOD did nothing to thwart its sale .

John Mann sent me this July 2021
"Hi Lawrence

Thanks for relaying your concerns.
With regards to your question, as I wrote to you previously, once Gazprombank gave consent for the IRC-Stocken transaction, the agreement entered into in March 2020 became binding for Petropavlovsk. Furthermore, the company has not received any written offers for the IRC stake from anyone aside from Stocken. Statements to the contrary on either of these points are inaccurate."

So it was our friend wh is using British sanctions to deliver POG to selected people that nade the sale binding. Of course Pavel couldn't comment as Akimov with Stukovs, Kharin had ensured Pavel was arrested in December 2020 and has been locked up and silenced ever since, Surely a coincidence.

Yeah right

It shows what we are up against you moron

lets try again
Justice for Maslovsky, [17/06/2022 17:20]
Today, after an almost two-month break, the court resumed the consideration of the case of Pavel Maslovsky.
As we said earlier, in connection with the change of the presiding judge, the criminal process actually begins from the very beginning. We will again have to hear voluminous volumes of written evidence and various financial documents before we move on to the examination of witnesses and the debate of the parties.
At today's meeting, the new judge and all participants in the process again heard the indictment and the position of the defense, which petitioned for a change in the preventive measure for Maslovsky to house arrest. No surprises - the position of the prosecution remained unchanged, the defense motion was rejected.
Pavel Maslovsky is still in jail. For almost 1.5 years in prison without proven guilt under a non-violent article.
And in this regard, I would like to make one small digression. We don’t know if today’s speech by Vladimir Putin at SPIEF was shown in the pre-trial detention center, so Maslovsky himself will get acquainted with it later, but we really hope that the new judge will definitely look at it and pay attention to the fact that the president:
??Called the Cabinet of Ministers and the Supreme Court to prepare amendments to the legislative norms excluding the detention of entrepreneurs under economic articles

??And also instructed the Security Council to deal with cases when criminal cases are initiated without sufficient grounds and are used to put pressure on businesses and citizens
We do not know for certain what such a persistent message from our supreme power is connected with - with the accumulated irritation from the wave of "strange" cases of persecution of entrepreneurs, similar to the "case" of Maslovsky; or with a radically complicated situation in the economy. But, one thing can definitely be said - in the current situation, Russia needs talented businessmen, and it needs them in freedom.
We hope that the judicial and law enforcement agencies will finally heed these unambiguous signals and justice will prevail.
In the meantime, we can only report that the next hearing in the Maslovsky case has been scheduled for June 21. We'll keep you posted.