RE: quick question from feasibility study24 Jan 2023 07:06
I think you guys picked up all of the salient points from that presentation. Years of raking over our own stages came in useful and a welcome change to focus on something else other than our own share.
I also noticed that the headline lithium tonnage that they continuously quote and show in slides, which is multiples of ours - but totally unproven, is included in a slide with an NPV figure which is a fraction of ours. Something wrong there - Daz?
Yet top dollar lithium prices are used in the same presentation. In fact the presenter quoted 5,000 as that day's price, then continued to users price a thousand dollars per tonne higher in the presentation to give the timeline, debt repaid April May next year using those figures.
Conclusion: more questions than answers from that presentation.
I think I will be sticking with Kodal.
Happy to wait for the deposit RNS in the following days from our mining partners.
As Merc said 39% of 100m is 39m, plus our own 18m and 2m if we sell the other West project, plus Goldfields, 100% of nothing is still nothing.