Member Info for Laverda

Elcobble, I think the above heading is more fitting.
Once the full cash is in around May at the latest, it is likely larger investors will enter, I think this was the idea of the additional broker, to open up institutional Investors, listening to Bernard's interview after adding the new broker.
With a lot of news expected this year it may be difficult to get hold of to these shares later in the year - we will see.
I am certainly not trading any of mine.

Here it is:

https://www.share-talk.com/kodal-minerals-aimkod-de-risked-undervalued-and-ready-to-rocket/

Good summary

Too many RNSs expected on the horizon.
Plus if Bougouni West sells you don't know what he may purchase, as he hinted at a purchase.

I think that Archer article may be correct, Bernard is going to spend millions (part of the 100m payment) to jorc quantify the remaining portion of the 3 lithium veins not included in our lithium resource totals, the remaining 7 veins add them to the resource then, as the article suggests, he may sell our share.
Archer the share journalist suggests that our portion of the lithium will be worth multiples of the funds that Hainan paid.
I could see that as a strong possibility.

Elcobble but as they said they do retain 100% in their chosen share.....of the debt.
Personally I prefer our (Kodal's) share of 118m

Thank you Clapa.

Tidal, June 2024 might be interesting, anyone's guess.
DMS plant fired up. Nielle jorc in, some of the additional veins quantified and proven resource increased to X, with more results due.....

Clapa, what does it say? Boris caught with a beer in hand again?

100notout, Bernard was a De Beers geologist, which made me wonder. While he was doing that job it may have sparked an idea. Gold was also a past life too.

Good point Daz, his detail and thoughts do get quoted, while many other CEOs on AIM only a few facts get pulled from their discussion, along with they remain upbeat or positive.
That is true.
Good times.

Sorry that was a reply to Daz

I like the fact he only issues jorc compliant finds, nobody is built up for impossible tonnages. Feels much better when the critical RNS lands.
Plus lithium dropped a thousand dollars per tonne from the all time high, but the lower figure of 5,000 dollars per tonne is almost 2.5 times the figures in our forecast.
All the RNS are better than expected.

100notout, he did mention adding something else, the only thing I could think he may want to add is diamonds, given his past?
None of the goldfields so far look like duds, one of them must be, he can't surely only identify runners.
I take it they dropped their copper resource when they found lithium?
I can't remember hearing any more about that.

Wand, that was exactly my thoughts when they were willing to let go of Bougouni West.
I think our 97km, while already fantastic and frankly enough to justify our investment, may go into orbit, the next jorc update will be interesting. We also do not know how long that will take as work never stopped right through from the June RNS, while Neille's gold jorc maiden value was temporarily placed on hold until this lithium deal was completed.

100notout. No I can't see them backing out either.
It was interesting that the article also picked up on their new lithium processing plant matching the available offtake tonnage.
I don't know why I am looking at this every couple of hours I am expecting to hold for at least 8 years! Can't help myself.

That article also reminded us that only three of the ten lithium veins already identified on the mining licence area have been partly quantified for lithium.
Bernard (probably for his geologist reputation) only releases jorc and higher standard figures on resources, absolutely no estimations.
We still have more of the three lithium veins and all (apart from intersections) of the remaining seven veins to add to our resource.
Plus of course gold.
Good article that, full of reminders.

Hull, Archer summarised all of it perfectly.
Many share investors simply follow their chosen share guru, articles like these will make a difference as time goes on.

I think one major point that has not been covered is giving away percentage, I am firmly in Bernard's camp with this. I see lithium high priced in the short term then my thoughts are 50% or less around or after 2030, dependent on upstream infrastructure.
I see companies trying to hang on to 100% of their resource losing more than 50% by being too slow to get into top gear production. By top gear production in our case I mean both plants producing.
So those companies chasing 100% of their resource will be in production when the resource is worth less than half current value, defeating the object.
Plus starting full production in a falling market is risky if anything goes wrong.
Kodal will have this site going full bore through the highest lithium prices.
Good article cheers.

https://www.mining.com/web/mali-industrial-gold-production-rises-4-4-to-66-2-tonnes-in-2022/

Clapa, you will not cope! 23
We will never find anything if we got that many.

Noelle, should be Nielle.