RE: Prem22 Aug 2023 08:38
Marcus you do not know that Stark's plant is not fit for purpose.
Stark resolve mining issues with plant modules, that is their business which they have built up very successfully, they are smart and experienced.
Yet they turned up day one with the wrong plant configuration on site, right from from day one, the scanner type for the first row of scanners was even incorrect.
You seem convinced all of that is Stark's fault.
I do not. They are too experienced at resolving issues on existing operations.
I don't believe that Stark had accurate data about the material entering the plant, if they did for a start their first row of scanners would be as they are now. Never mind the magnetic roller issue and so on.
So the big question is, is the data from the small claims licence flawed and the pay dirt is not of good quality?
Or can Stark, even after receiving duff data, rescue the situation?
George is making out he is the white knight, a year or two down the road we might hear different when Stark is out of the contract.