RE: pdub23 Mar 2023 10:45
Re frequent references to `balance' - what a crock. A balanced argument requires both parties to present an argument. I do not see any arguments or facts presented by our resident trolls, just snipes and jibes, most of which seem to be directed at Pdub. Maybe Pdub can be a bit sarcastic in some of his responses, but when one is personally targeted in such a crude and clumsy manner on such a frequent basis, I think we can cut him some slack. Pdub, HarChris and others are providing the sort of factual information which would make this one of the most informative fora on lse, were it not for the heckling and baiting from the stands. So what I am saying is, If you disagree with the positive views, come up with a grown up counter view based on some effing fact. More than 3 lines of joined up English would be a good start. And `sack the CEO because the SP is down' doesn't count.