Member Info for Lamps56

Well, not for your wit obviously.

HMHG - Didn't laugh, but seeing as you popped up, I'll ask the question to you: why are you here?

It's a mystery. The boards for my other five AIM investments have less traffic in a year than this board does in one day, and although the occasional naysayer pops up, the contributions on those other boards are clearly from folks who have a vested interest. None have anywhere near the quality of information provided by Pdub and Harchris et al, but I can state with absolute certainty that none have the presence of so many trolls with such extraordinary persistence. The disparity is baffling. Is it something like wasps being attracted to the honey jar?

Pdub - exactly. Any other small cap stock with this volume and Buy to Sell ratio would have gone up by a lot more this week.

ARC - could you please recommend another share that is definitely a bad investment? I have lots of spare time on my hands, so I can do some superficial research, not invest a penny in it, and then kill some time (and build up my posts count) by slating it on a regular basis. Much more fun that watching Netflix wouldn't you agree?

Pipeline growth anouncement within the next month.

Hippy - have you ever considered that Fortune doesn’t wish to engage in a farting contest with you?

Buys outweigh Sells today. Looks accurate. Go figure.

Er, yes. Better keep your head down for a while.

Apologies for replying to my own post, but there is a handful of contributors on here that evidently, demonstrably, verifiably, and by any other fact checking measure, know and record what this company has achieved and is likely to achieve in the future. The criticism is just noise, and most of the rebuttals are akin to Patriots shooting down drones. Genuine investors should not lose heart, it will come good. Fundamentals trump all other suits. For those whose investments have not met their expectations in whatever period of time they set themselves, I am really sorry. (ish).

Think we have got something going here. Looking for at least 20 posts on the subject please Trolls. We can go again on Friday with 'Share price declines, then recovers, then declines again.' Can't wait for the gems of insight that will emerge.

And so you beat on Cinders, boat against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.

I think Fortune Mojapelo is the polar opposite of naive. That is why I remain invested. Sorry not to get excited about the SP, except to see how cheaply I can pick up another tranche.

Dig out

Troajan - on bad days I just did out that list of US critical minerals, remind myself which miners are actually producing those minerals and, moreover, securing value throughout the supply chain, kick back and relax.

Indeed it is Troajan and anybody with a predominately mining portfolio can see that. However, that will not stop the single issue maniacs on this board (the majority of whom have an account solely for this board) from blaming Fortune and any other soft target associated with BMN.

ARCM101 - to accuse Pdub for being `very dangerous' is quite comical. Have you ever countered a single statement of fact that he has made? I guess you mean his strategy of focusing on fundamentals is flawed, but that goes against received wisdom I think. Your sole purpose in life appears to be piling in with the rest of the hyenas when the SP drops. So are you actually invested in this share or any share? If you are invested, did you commit on the basis of Pdub's advice? As for `doing a public service' ......... WHAT? This is a chat board FFS. Get a grip.

ALB1, you have definitely qualified as a deramper following a consistently negative line over several months. What are your credentials? Are you invested in this share or anything else?

I have some confidence that DE will get this out of the rut, but Align's cheerleading, after the IRON debacle, leaves me stone cold.

Posters with a predominately negative view of this share (with the odd exception) do not show comments on any other share in their Member Information, even when they profess to have limited share holdings and ' diverse portfolios’. Can we assume multiple accounts? Positive posters do not seem to mind disclosing other interests (notable exception is Pdub who has always been transparent as being 'all in’ to BMN).

Is transparency a factor in motive? Just a thought. Check it out.