JSE vs PTAL (fake debate)16 Jan 2025 11:17
Funny how this chat room reads like a JSE vs PTAL debate. Let me put this one to bed. PTAL has delivered shareholders 27% upside in the past fortnight. It has $100m+ net cash, 12%+ dividend yield, $245m EBITDA guidance for 2025, 22,000 boed production guidance for 2025 (+24%), 4 planned development wells (2025), 100m barrels 2P reserves & exploration upside. Management is superb and growth since 2018 has been phenomenal. Sales decline in Q3 when river levels are low & the company engages well with 'the locals'. Management plans for this accordingly.
So why is there a 'JSE vs PTAL' debate? You can own PTAL stock and JSE stock (and ditto gems like AXL & AET but that's another chat room). As an incoming President might say, 'fake debate'.
Anyone arguing that JSE hasn't been a disaster zone in recent years is delusional. Share price down 70% in 5 years. Huge loss of shareholder value. Indebtedness (arguably not at scary levels). Net loss in 2023. Net loss in H1 2024. Montana oil spill etcetera.
So the question is - what are the catalysts for turning this from a shareholder-value-sucking disaster zone into a 'bagger'? Change of strategy? New management team? New Board of Directors? Massive cost-cutting? Removal of most loss-making operations? Higher hydrocarbon prices? Exploration home run? Has this happened yet or is this a future thing? Genuine questions as I'm new to this stock.
There is a lot to like here - geographical spread (Australia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam) and 'high' production volumes (18,500 boed) in particular. But non-shareholders need a solid reason to invest their hard-earned dosh, such as a stonking set of H2 2024 numbers.