Member Info for katstrangler

And it's done so undue influence is transparent... like when you post on this bb every time you buy... but it's for all investors, everywhere.

As far as i'm aware, it's 3£ for uk shares and 5% for non uk companies (incorporated outside of UK).

i'm not sure if it's different for foreign investors...

In the eyes of the FCA and the London Stock Exchange, the short answer is: No, they are generally not separate. For the purposes of a TR-1 notification, holdings for minor children are almost always aggregated (added together) with the parent's holdings. You cannot bypass the 3% disclosure threshold by splitting a 5% stake into five 1% chunks across your children.

Here is the legal and practical breakdown of why they are "tied" to you:..

but i'll leave you to work that one out...

so, either see your TR1 or you'll be selling, eh!

i'll ask shayne...

Not really, Billy. for someone who's got a plan to hold for years and years it's comforting to see your... holidays(?) occupied hourly with posting on this.

and i look forward to seeing your TR1 any day now... you know, under the FCA's Disclosure and Transparency Rules. Maybe i should inform Sayne on linkedin! : )

You mug, Billy! how much profit have you lost cashing in your golden goose for this lame duck!

Billy, i honestly think that's one for the holders...

Keep an eye on the ATs... the moment they move out of the tens and hundred of shares into the thousands is the time you see ii's buying into good news.

Well, considering they ask their own questions, they could easily avoid the telling questions. they didn't mention the drop in btc after talking about it being a treasury move... nor why they hadn't averaged down.

if it's another two minuter i'm sure they could rave about the 'benefit's of their purchase of finferro.

after all the linkedin talk i went there to see how they'd played the MICA thing... they didn't. just 'bragged' about how pleased they were with the finferro buy.

still, lets see what they pull out the bag.

First, it's 'loser' not 'looser', unless you're talking about the rampers and their bowel movements...

not seeing the 'massive rise'... barely a trade as everyone who's in it is 'in it'... the rest of the market is waiting to see what the next news is and when... or if.

that'll teach the silly agressions being shown. but will be a relief if some good news comes along. anyone want to guess what the first rns will be?

looking forward to the next podcast to see how they spin it...

You just sound like a pack of out of control hounds.

this just isn't the way to conduct a bb.

but good luck with your informed posts about the company... should pull in all the new investors you need!

And, have to say, not seeing the bounce that all the matey 'reach arounds'.

if this is how you counter poor news and company updates, then i'm embarrassed for you all.

still, 'dyor', eh!

Why aren't you asking him why the MICA failed, when are they planning to reapply, does Poland really mean it's 'business as usual' and are they planning to move the btc placing money into general spend!

See if those AT trades can push the sp down for shorts to close or whether the sp starts to rise in advance of next update.

gla (but i'm probably talking to myself...)

... but 'horses for courses'n'all that!

gla.

Sorry, ian but i wouldn't...

Have a good day, all, whatever your position.

Leew, that rns was a desperate measure to stop the company from catastrophe. and i bet they paid through the nose for it... significantly more than they would have ordinarily.

but it saved the company... at least, until end of June. But they can't keep moving registry from one country to another, like a gypsy camp. The MICA reapplication, when they reapply, is an all or nothing bet. And still not a guarantee, as has been shown.

but an intraday would be useful.

The ONLY thing you can really accuse chaebol of is proflific posting... the bad news is coming from the company. do you really think one person has the clout to move the share?

if that was the case they'd all be doing it.

suspect it's more about some holders hedging their bets on poor news, some holders reading his posts and realising they don't really know that much about the company so maybe he's right... and a few who just haven't seen the rises they thought they'd see by end of year because the news was bad and just quitting, either to see if it drops more or waiting for a definite turn in fortunes.

think it's ridiculous, frankly, to think anyone with just a small short, who isn't a bear company like Grizzly Research who moved the company by releasing a press release to the media.

i lost out with this from 1.9 down... only myself to blame... and it'll be only myself to blame again if it suddenly gets some stellar news and bounces back to 1.9... you have to live with your own choices.

gl with tomorrow.

Try directing your anger at the people making the decisions, not the people commenting on the decisions.

or just take a bubble bath...

... and that's all i have to say on the matter... until the next rns, good OR bad!