Member Info for katstrangler

With looking at this company! the best half sentence for weeks...

the last news was nothing like what everyone was punting as an 'expectation'... no reason to believe the next one will do the same... still waiting on the first repayment and what, exactly will be transacted.

but, gla. if anyone needed it...

Just about the stupidest comment one could make because 'all shares are the same, aren't they'!

the sp is now 23.5p and there's a damned good reason for it... (as for GST they've 'raised' funding that's either the best deal ever, in the history of fundraising, where the company don't really want any profit or... there's a hidden aspect to it that bodes ill for the company).

Morning, code. yes, agree about the 'illegal' get out of not signing contracts... should have thought of that.

regardless, i'm still looking for F-4 to finally be published this month so have loaded up accordingly. at 40p i still think it's cheap or, a lot cheaper than it has been... if i have spare, anything below 42 is worth an add...

Not really amateur... more penny pinching... but no point going in and offering 400p only for overpaying damaging the company's own sp.

if i were them, i'd offer 330 and, if it fails, quit, wait for a market dip and buy more in the market. chase it again in 6 months...

SALT as been stepped down from mid 60s in Jan to 28 last week... with no new contracts and cashburn that mean theyr'e done without a placing by oct. plain to see unless they pull out a contract... but no new production numbers, no new deals.

if there's nothing this month there's a placing. if you can't read that as a likelihood... if you think investing is about hope then no wonder you're in the red on this one... (but of course, you're probably massively in profit... everyone ho posts here is... OR they find a way to pain a loss as a tax benefit!)

... because it's illegal to witthold news to manipulate the market price?

Just hope your faith in this individual pays you dividencds.

gl.

'someone' also stalked me to IKA and warned them too... but probably neglected to notice that IKa placed at 28 from 37high and a higher spike than that...

suggest folk keep an eye on SALT too... you'll likelyy see a proper placing of a distressed share , possibly with warrants and high price that SALE will pay... which is how placings are done... and the reason why i view this funding with such deep suspicion.

but if you can satisfy yourself that this deal is above board (and that santa really exists) then knock yourself out and keep adding. it's only going up from here...

And the fact that 'someone' follows me to other bbs to 'warn' other posters because i said i expected a low, low placing, without mentioning just why anyone with 20:20 vision would have thought the same (except for those serial rampers who have too much invested to bail) but who still stalks me to 'warn' others... if that doesn't tell you about the mentaility of the 'somone' is question, then i'd question why you think they're a valuable researcher in this company?

There's no money changing hands. that's the weakest delusion of those who look at the facts but refuse to see them because, if you dan't have another company to invest in that will make up for the 'loyalty' of staying in because of 'dyor' ramping then the only answer is to hope the abuser can change: ie. GST

but, seriously, looking at their work over the past... 3 years, what have they done to put money in your pocket?

if anyone is paid to post i can think of at least 4 serial rampers who haven't changed their postings since 2p and think celebrating buying a few shares at 0.2p is a victory!

honest debate turned into idiculous aggressions, to hide the fact that the share is ... just... horrible!

The later, the worse the offer (not that they have much of a hand to play, atm. as all the positive news has disappeared.) so expect it to be with an existing ii who will have sold their current shares into the search for funds and will be replacing the sold shares with the dropped price.

for me, it's just how low did they have to go and will it be sufficient for a full year's funding. surely £5mill, at least?

only upside is whether they'll keep the placing near to 22p to save the drop on their remaining shares or whether it's someone playing hardball.

but at least it'd keep the company afloat for another year... but they're going to really need to deliver a decent contract as these nomnal sums just make it worse.

You have a limited vocabulary for insults... 'fish and chip supper'... is that supposed to hurt?

no wish for the company to die. but there's a difference between 'hoping' and 'seeing'. you're hoping... i'm seeing.

have a good weekend, though...(and some oblique reference to 'fish'n'chips')

Well, you don't... only post here... and invariably personal attacks over company talk...

2 year timeline, though.

'I wish no one responded to the naysayers as there's a high chance they're getting paid per response, again, AIMHO. DYOR'

are you saing 'dyor' about paid posters or the news thats out there? and what can charts possibly tell you about a share that has £11kin volume bt lunchtiime?

i think most of the research is now out there... whether folk decide to be selective about what opinions they research or dont is a bias that depends on how much in the red one is and whether folk have an alternative pick to make back the loss over hoping the company that put them in the red will have a plan to rescue them, not rescue the company and the BoD.

different objectives.

Having done some 'dyor', realised that noone is likely to put an offer for ITV, even if they would just sell on the Broadcasting to Sky, as long as it questionable that CMA will agree to it as no production company want to have broadcasting on their hands when it looks like sky are the only likely interested party.

the longer it goes on, the more selling will continue as ii's can't have investments sitting for 12-18months without news.

while i anticipated a 70p drop, there's an outside fear that, if ii's start selling, even off book, the price could drop below that, as thee's no rescue company in the wings until CMA result. so you either hold and wait or you sell and look for the drop in rice.

mad situation when a buyer completely knackers the future for 12-18months!

You've made your own point, eastwood. the sp went to 215... so many folk are now in the red, from 120 upwards. that means, while some have enjoyed being in from 60p average, there will be the herd who have averages above the current price.

they're the ones complaining because their bellies were bigger than the facts. but that's why everyone loves AIM, because 'it could be you' that sells the spike! reality usually only comes in when the larger traders take their profits and sink the price.

then the moaning... then the giving up, then the dropped price, then the wait for the next positive news. might take weeks, might take months. but there'll be opps for folk if they keep tabs on the sp and the timeline.

I'm just happy to see through the company rns' and to do the right research to see whether this will rise on the facts or rise on ramps and then fall.

i've made my money on the ramps... not interested in fanclub optimism. the facts are there, for all to see, unless you're clueless about where else to invest in so just hope this will come good.

but if this conversation gives someone the incentive to do their own research, instead of just reading these ridiculous posts then that's a good thing. up to them what they choose to believe.

Sigas, so you're invested at 5 - 10p but still can't let a criticism go about the ramping of the share and the line that's towed? you've multibagged but still see fit to throw out insults because someone suggested the price was being worked down for some reason from upper 50s and then the 33p placing came along?

and then when 'someone' suggested the 54p high was a spike the relentless insults for daring to suggest the price could slip so, instead of '50p due, surely' we got y'days 38p?

have some grace in your multbag win and either filter or stop with the childish insults as it just makes you look petty.

seriously, filter and you won't see my comment, negative OR positive!

888, and you don't see this as another case of 'mad rampers' pumping a share that has almost nothing going for it except for buzzwords like 'agentic', while creating a debt with dubious background and punt out outrageous target figures, much like the Semnet IPO?

i mean, what work did Trident actually do to put that into action?

most of the things the company has done, from inflating the price of the wife's part owned Semnet, to the funds from Chan's business partner, lye, to putting the debt at the front of retail if it goes into admin to including vwap non voting shares... to losing their licences to cancelling crypto trading... and you think it's the critics who are 'mad'?