Member Info for katstrangler

No 'curve balls'... all just desperately flailing about trying to keep the company from drowning not 'curve ball' saving.

just say where the money has come from and why and you'll get some honesty on the bb.

but that's enough correcting from me today.

If it were so easy to buy a MICA licence off the peg then why did BoD waste a year failing in the first application and then suspiciously failing to apply the second time, having said they would in Q1 meaning that Bake had to be closed down?

do you really need 'others' to make that point for you?

What they are planning is to dig themselves out of a hole by finding deb to cover the loss of revenue from their miserable performance since... they started?

i'm not miserable about it as i'm not in it... and i'm happy to not be in it but what i can't stand is the bs 'optimism' which tells me that a lot of posters here just hoping rampy posts will someohow persuade holders of 1.88billion shares will look to buy more.

luckily/unluckily, most are severely in debt here and psychology of retail investing is, if you're that much in the hole you might as well just hope it turns because, having sunk so much into a losing share, what hope is there that they have better choices out there in the wider investing world?

It was 60p only 8 weeks ago... i think 125 is just fine for consolidation. been a month of profit taking and it's pretty much dried up.

won't take too long for the selling to be outstripped by the buying and then you'll see it pulled towards that 200p *might get there... might not. hard to guess where resistance is now but it'll be a damned sight better than today's 122.)

It's not 'agile'... that's just another way of saying they're spreading themselves too thinly, trying to cove a dozen bases and doing so inadequately in all of them. if they'd focused on lithuania and properly satisfied the brief to get the job done, instead of applying too late, paying lipservice to staff, getting turned down for being slack on submission date, then desperately pivoting to poland and spending money on acquisitions for what turned out to be just a 3 month stay of execution before then shutting down bake!

what happened to uk stablecoin? how many thousands of posts were banging on about how 'brilliantly' they were playing that dead effort?

same with s america... what, exactly are they doing and is it close to satisfying the minimum requirements?

and if court case was a shoo-in why do they need this weirdly mysterious funding that is uniquely impossible to understand properly as to what the funds are even for (assumiing they get them and don't trash the sp)! but with the knowledge that they're be printing millions of shares on a 10day vwap.

admitting being behind the 8 ball isn't something holders do... it takes those not invested to make that call... and it's why noone likes to read such posts!

looking forward to the next acquisition... have to check what other companies the wives own!

Suspect this week will see the end of the 124p churn and start to see the rise next week... 130 - 135 before DESNZ is announced and then 150 on the news. will need herd optimism to push it higher than that imo... but entirely possible. whre the next comes froms from beyond that, in the near term, though...

Just needs a trigger to see the churn turn into persistent buying.

atm, 124 is still the support...

gla.

AIM, it's a discussion board about GST. it's not a fan club. if you don't know how to discuss the company and its news to ascertain whether or not it's good or bad news then i'm not sure why you're investing?

grow up and look at the company for hat it is, not how you wish it was... that's the only way to make good decisions.

There are major holders out there who patently don't want to be holding!

Noone in finance offers an unsecured £10million with only a 5% interest pa... they don't get a benefit from the company doing well. they can get 5% from a a high street bank, never mind serious alt investments.

the only offer is that it's a deal with hidden connections to the BoD... that the court case is going to fail and that the sp will fall, with the vwap then coming into effect.

only answer to why the funds are being issued is it's a massive expansion of BoDs stake in the company, as he sp falls... if you have a better explanation, please write it up... there are many holders who want a coherent answer over and above childish ramping.

gla.

Saying they lose and are fines... where IS that cash? assuming they lose, that is!

as for the loan, until you can understand WHY a anonymous provider would offer £10million for a paltry 5% pa then i suggest GST have done a marvellous job of hiding the true facts of the case.

where's the benefit for the funders! answers on the back of a pstcard to...

...not without 'ordinary dilution'... not at all.

expect those deeply in the red to hide the negatives as it's the only way to pull in new buyers.

show me what the company actually now has that makes revenue... and maybe you'll understand why they needed this loan!

"The Company may elect to prepay all or part of the Facility together with accrued interest in cash, ordinary shares and/or preference shares..."

they're hardly going to use the loan to pay back the loan so it'll be in shares... lots and lots of shares on a 10 day vwap.

they seem to have spent a lot of money trying to hide all the details in wording to confuse the retailers... begin to wonder if this isn't also a way for the BoD to do a 'friendly deal' with the money coming from them, via this mewly formed company, getting a 5% interest payment?

then, what happens if the Semnet court case fails or MICA is officially announced as not happening and the price collapses? that's when the 10day vwap comes into play.

company doesn't have to go bust for the BoD to benefit as their gameplan is for year not days...

but good luck with the rest of the week.

AIM, you don't have to do anything because of my posts... i'm just debating where the company have come from and why they have no history of investing in shares! if you're happy with the rns at face value, fine.

my bet is as long as the sp doesn't fall everyone will tty and talk up the 'deal'. but if something 'untoward' does happen then the same rampers will badmouth the company and then call them gangsters.

all i know is i look at these rns' to learn about rns' so if something like this happens with a share i AM in i'll be able to read it better than the average retailer.

keep holding or even buying... i don't care. happy with my understanding of the situation, even if it goes up tomorrow.

If it goes to 24 then i'll look for the explanation of why... i'll also be looking to see whether there are subscriptions and who, exactly is taking them. but that won't stop it saving the company until late 2027 and that'll give time for contracts to materialise.

it really isn't that hard to understand. what annoys holders is the concern that it feels like it's a possibility so are left with the choice to either sell some and hope it falls and get more shares for the same money or hold off buying this drop and find money to average down IF the placing comes. maybe the fault lies with passive investing and only believing that all shares always do well?

If there's a takeover announcement tomorrow, i'll wish you well.

Bidstack???? jeebus, most on here won't have a clue what you're talking about and, no... didn't lose 'the house'... but it's really funny how holders try to use personal attacks to invalidate facts on here. anyone seen any evidence of who Clarivan Group Kommanditbolag actually are, have any history or understand why they're offering this cash?

thought not...

Because, at worst, it's a better bet at 24p than it was at 40p and current 31p. and, if there's evidence that something could happen post placing then having a lower entry price gives a better safety margin should hings not pan out!

there's an argument for not being in this at all (and i'm not atm,though i have been in in better times) but the story changes with the times...

is it really SOOOOOO hard to understand that a lower price is better than a higher one?

Upside, at least someone will be able to replace those treasury assets as there'll be plenty more shares out there!

They've never worked to fund anyone else and thee's no track record of them anywhere, with no footprint and not realy any evidence that the cash even exists. bu, even if it does, it's INCREDIBLY suspicious and it might as well say £20million or £100million!

what'll be interesting is to see what happens in July when they are supposed to drawdown the first £5million and issue 1billion+ shares and see them hit the markets.

what it says is there's no more revenue coming from anywhere else for the next couple of months and certainly not by the courtcase and not bake!

i suspect even lthers will be looking for any rampy bump and at least a partial exist before then for fear that this is more GST bs...

never seen the like in 10 years of investing! 🤣🤣🤣