Member Info for katstrangler

888. said many times that my last sell here was at 0.6 so i'm still doing better than anyone with the current price.

and with that, have a good weekend!

... won't be surprised to see a large UT or delayed trades to set up for next week...

have a good weekend, all.

Sorry, AIM but you got back in at the wrong time... your glass is 3/4 empty and there's a fly in it, too.

if ANY of you asked ai about the current state of GST, their funding, its source, why it was done, the courtcase, 'blank slate; MICA applications that are easy, the lack of lithuania update and why the poland deal has been a mess, you'd maybe appreciate to not just change glasses but go to a differnt pub (if we're going to use your boring metaphor).

GST is just a home now for hope that an rns will come out to save the day... and there are plenty of shares with infinitely better short, medium and long term prospects than this.

but doesn't matter if i'm wrong... so i hope BoD have been cannier players than i've given them credit for.

gl to you...

It's not so much whether it's a good product, more is it a good enough product to give the product higher health credentials at the same price as the worse, cheaper options.

atm, SALT has had a lunatic rise, forced mainly by ii's i suspect, as there's been zero interest from ramps on this one, since the Tier1 story fizzled without any mention of Microsalt... anywhere!

wait for the placing and the explanation of how much and why to see if it's worth taking.

gla.

Just detest dangling bs hope to save your own position when folk have been so dismissive of honestly posted info previously...

and, fyi, too busy in ITM to seriously worry about GST... you live with your own collective conscience with what you do...

Gla.

I don't blame you but you accuse folk of 'trolling' holders but you all seem to be happy to post bs statements hoping to pull in new buyers to make you feel better about your own selling options... because there's nothing that's been found that will make a difference to the company for months and months so must be ramping to get out!

same coin as your 'trolling' accusations just from already being in and wanting out!

You’ve actually highlighted exactly how the retail bulletin boards operate—they look at a headline, see a brand-new name get a license, and conclude that a "clean application" can simply bypass the heavy pre-conditions.

It is an incredibly seductive argument because it makes a complex process look easy. But here is the massive catch behind how AlphaRoute actually got that license today (June 19, 2026), and why it doesn’t mean the conditions don't exist:

1. The "Invisible" Pre-Condition Phase

When investors see an "unknown" company get a license out of nowhere, they assume the company just sent in a tidy packet of forms and got a "Yes." What they are completely missing is Latvijas Banka’s mandatory Pre-Licensing Program.

The Latvian central bank explicitly states that before a company can even formally submit an application, they must go through a free, multi-month consulting and evaluation phase with the regulator.

The Reality: AlphaRoute didn't bypass the pre-conditions. They spent months in a closed-door sandbox cleaning up their internal structures, proving their technology, and satisfying the regulator before their application was ever made public.

By the time AlphaRoute submitted their final paperwork, the regulator already knew exactly who they were, who their compliance officers were, and where their servers were located. It looked "clean" on day one only because all the messy, heavy groundwork was done in secret.

Feel confident of 130ish into close but next week will see a real renewed interest in GBE, the north and the revitalisation of govt and policy.

looking good for ITM into the coming contract news: DESNZ, HARL and the protium relationship.

good time to be back in...

When mayor. he's solidly into the northern powerhouse and non-oil progress. if bllooddyy farage was to be pm then i wouldn't post same as we know he's a 'drill, baby, drill' nob!

Again, jake, it's the same with every comment on here... they're just opinions on national events and we don't have anything better than an opinion on what info is out there, bar rns'. and even rns' can be affected by further developments...

how you decide to navigate the news and the opinions is up to you. for me, i've already decided that i'll have the option to get out next week at 135, if i feel there's another, faster, horse in a race or not. but i think, for anyone who likes this as a long term option, i don't see downside. and i don't nec. only post to boost my own short term view... happy to express opinion that others might care to read, to their own possible benefit.

A pointless comment. you can say the same of companies, BoDs, etc. if you're that cyncial then no idea why you read any bb as every post is an angle based on a holding or wannabe holding.

incidentally, continuing the Burnham headline:

The Miliband Partnership: The Rumored Dream Team

The most fascinating development over the last 48 hours is the heavy rumor in Westminster that Ed Miliband is actively backing Burnham’s leadership bid behind the scenes.

The word on the street is that if Burnham takes No. 10, Miliband is the front-runner to become Chancellor.

This is an incredibly powerful combination for ITM Power:

The Strategic Hand-in-Hand: Currently under Starmer, Miliband is frequently forced onto "resignation watch" because the Treasury keeps trying to shave down his Net Zero budgets to fund other crises (like defence spending gaps).

The Shift: With Burnham as PM and Miliband holding the purse strings at the Treasury, the friction vanishes. Miliband’s ideological zeal for the green transition would no longer be a departmental budget fight; it would become the entire economic strategy of the British state.

Some folk just can't stand a new voice having an opinion on their 'owned' share... but, here is the position for Burnham pmship:

The short answer to your question is yes, a Burnham premiership would be deeply symbiotic with Ed Miliband’s green energy strategy, and it would represent a massive, long-term structural benefit for ITM Power.

In fact, the political alignment currently forming behind the scenes is incredibly bullish for the UK green hydrogen sector. Here is exactly how Burnham's stance on Net Zero fits hand-in-hand with Miliband, and what it means for ITM.

If anyone thought Burnham would water down Labour's climate targets to appease the "Red Wall" voters he just won over in Makerfield, his victory speech this morning put that to bed. He explicitly stated:

"We’re showing what can be achieved by providing clear and consistent political and policy support to the developing green economy... There must be no turning away from Net Zero. It is the future."

Yorkshire and humber will undoubtedly be recipient of shift in local policies for environment and infrastructure. 'manchesterism' undoubtedly puts ITM in the middle of it.

might take a while to deliver but it'll just be confirmation of the company being in the right place...at the right time.

tempted to say it shifts my target prices for this.

Lookiing fowrard to the confirmation of DESNZ... next week?

Gla.

No 'curve balls'... all just desperately flailing about trying to keep the company from drowning not 'curve ball' saving.

just say where the money has come from and why and you'll get some honesty on the bb.

but that's enough correcting from me today.

If it were so easy to buy a MICA licence off the peg then why did BoD waste a year failing in the first application and then suspiciously failing to apply the second time, having said they would in Q1 meaning that Bake had to be closed down?

do you really need 'others' to make that point for you?

What they are planning is to dig themselves out of a hole by finding deb to cover the loss of revenue from their miserable performance since... they started?

i'm not miserable about it as i'm not in it... and i'm happy to not be in it but what i can't stand is the bs 'optimism' which tells me that a lot of posters here just hoping rampy posts will someohow persuade holders of 1.88billion shares will look to buy more.

luckily/unluckily, most are severely in debt here and psychology of retail investing is, if you're that much in the hole you might as well just hope it turns because, having sunk so much into a losing share, what hope is there that they have better choices out there in the wider investing world?

It was 60p only 8 weeks ago... i think 125 is just fine for consolidation. been a month of profit taking and it's pretty much dried up.

won't take too long for the selling to be outstripped by the buying and then you'll see it pulled towards that 200p *might get there... might not. hard to guess where resistance is now but it'll be a damned sight better than today's 122.)