Member Info for katstrangler

How about effing off back to PANR with your desperate bid to make some pennies!

How about effing off back to PANR with your desperate bid to make some pennies!

How about effing off back to PANR with your desperate bid to make some pennies!

But as theyre'a bout 18millon shares needed to cover the shorts... )

Then we'd see this back over 175 by close. if that happens then i expect to see 180+ by weekend.

Esduk, we already know that... restating it endlessly doesn't make the case for MKa better, it just makes the slide in the sp more irritating. makes the incidental news more irritating too.

for all your positives, the sp has lost 40% from the G7 ramps about grants and payments coming a reality check is sometimes a good thing, even if it's a show of frustration.

So, get the trail started and... couple of months of sideways moves.

(i may be wrong about the equity release in canada... going from memory...)

Not particualrly flattered by the stalking but as i can't be bothered, atm, to read his empty nonsense, i'll recondier unfiltering him if he posts something that makes a reasoned statement about news to come and why it'll come and how it fits in with the current history.

zero point in saying 'it just needs some news and it'll bag'... that as pointless as saying' i just need to pick 5 nubers to win the lottery'.

so, go on massive, make me proud and post something valuable to all holders that isn't just you chomping on those gums of yours.

Esduk, you can't just look at a nasdaq company that goes up 200% and take comfort from it... it surely depends on what its valuation was pre going public.

are you saying that MKA's SPAC is going to bag or multibag?

as for the price, i think there are buys going on offbook from uk to US holders, who don't want to hold a US assets for the additional complications.

also, in Feb, isn't there an equity release of shares in Canada? So there's been some selling to cover profits, in case.

it's now a race between what news comes first and the sp could still be chipped away, once offbook trades dry up... 'course, could go up too but, atm, there's some downward pressure, athough the buys are still near to 47.

but now needs some actual news on MKA, not general REE news stories.

There are shorts at 150 that are now hurting... so 180+ on the cards.

and bodes well for Tuesday...see if the confidence is justified.

But it hasn't been a 'green man' crossing sign, has it. the lights are smashed, there's a drunk driver in a ford escort with a failed MOT and you're busy looking at the hot totty checking herslef out in the window of a shop.

there's nothing about this share that is a 'green man' crossing. if the MICA/Semnet mess/revenue down/sp hasn't shown you that...

the only question is how low does the sp go, or is this the low and how safe would your money be for a good rise to come? and you have to decide that, with or without the 'trolling'.

Well, as an analogy, if you've been investing for 25 years and never had a loss then dont bother reading 'trolling' opinions!

It's for you to read them... or not.

if you want to refuse to take the opinion as part of your research or refuse to check what is said...

put the 'trolling' to your advantage. or not...

if someone shouts 'look out' as you cross the road you don't think 'troll! ii'll just keep on walking' at least, not without checking around you.

Last couple of rns' show company were guiding the recovery. y'day shows market buying has taken over.

if it gets to 175 i suspect that's the short squeeze holders are looking for and mean market thinks the Grazzly damage is minimal to results and on track for 200+ next week, with immediate jump on Tuesday.

looking good.

As of today, January 7, 2026, the "gap" between the market makers' manufactured prices and the regulatory reality is at its widest.

1. The "Immediate" Rejection Risk

You asked if a re-application can be turned down immediately. Under MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) rules, the answer is yes, but it usually happens in a specific "procedural" way rather than a judgment on the business itself.

The 25-Day Filter: Once GST re-submits in Q1 (as promised in their Dec 31 RNS), the Bank of Lithuania has 25 working days to perform a "Completeness Check."

The "Fast No": If the regulator finds that the reasons for the December failure (e.g., lack of local directors, insufficient capital proof, or vague AML protocols) haven't been explicitly fixed, they can reject the application as "Incomplete."

The Impact: This would be a disaster for the share price. If they fail the "Completeness Check" twice, the market will assume the Lithuania entity is "blacklisted" in all but name.

2. Does the First Failure Matter?

Absolutely. Regulators are risk-averse. A failed application doesn't just go to the bottom of the pile; it goes to the "High Scrutiny" pile.

The Red Flag Audit: The case officer will specifically look for the "Change Log." GST must prove exactly what is different this time.

The VASP "Safety Net": The fact that GST bought Finferno in Poland is their way of saying to the regulator: "We have a backup, so we aren't desperate." Ironically, having a backup plan sometimes makes regulators more comfortable because it shows the company can survive the wait.

i'd be surprised to see the reapplication happen this week... but then i'm not in it so if it happens i'll try and jump onboard, depending on the price at the time... but this has a long way to go before optimsm reigns... imo.

good luck for tomor... this morning.

Didn't say it was over or undervalued. that depends on the news to come.

seeing as the company never stated why the application was rejected, it's difficult to know whether the reapplication will get any further.

if they haven't rectified the issues that were bought to their attention, on sufficient local involvement, over and above what they have already announced, then there's a chance it'll get rejected again.

i can imagine a spike on the morning or intraday that they announce they have (if they do) re-applied but as they've pretty much hidden the details and, instead, trumpeted the 'new territoriy' news of Poland... but i also think it'll spike and it'll be swift. at least, until BoD give a very good account of themselves to the markets to ezplain why this chance is better. otherwise, it's just another Poland rns and new longer term investors avoiding.

similarly, the Semnet news needs to be everything they 'expected'. if there's any slide in the result or if it's delayed...

truth is, i'm happier out of it but i've got no problem with trading it. how big it'll be is moot... but i'll try and be on it, along with any other news that's out there by 07.05

...that should've said 0.49 to buy...

The sp is at 0.40 to buy and 0.46 on the sell... though it WAS 0.41 on a couple of sells.

are you seriously crowing about the rise for a punted 0,35 by mms?

why aren't you talking about the 1.2, the 1.9 placings and where we are in comparison to that? and just how long it's been since then?

ftr, it's been six months since 1.2 placing and one year exactly since the 1.9p placing.

also, while i'm no big fan of anyone here (aside for lloyd (which is universal!) i seriously don't think chaebol cares if you're buddies or not on here. you can all buddy up in your adversity but it doesn't help you except by encouraging each other to add more shares... which is your prerogative.

as far as the company is concerned, they have until the 18th to reapply for the MICA... that's nothing to rave about as it's merely the last date to be considered. if they don't then you'll all be scratching your heads as to what the new game is. even i expect them to reapply but it's not the reapplication that counts, it's what they will say they have to do to get it over the line. be interesting to see if a podcast every arrives and if they'll tackle serious points or if they'll just talk about how 'exciting it is to be 'expanding' into a new territory without explaining that, if they hadn't...

but i'll be interested to see if those targets materialise.

exciting times, eh!

Oh, god! has there EVER been a more redundant poster than him, if that's what he said!

he is the lamest poster and i now believe he has zero comprehension of this company and just hid behind others who were more informed.

anyone who posts lists of name-xalling as investor advice has already hit peak dementia (no attempts to guilt me by saying 'how dare you, i have a relative who... 'because we all have!

what has he EVER posted that was informative, good or bad?