Member Info for Kammy18

I agree, but my point, based on past form, if there was no war, RY and the BOD would still be stonewalling us as they have since 2015.

If RY and the BOD were sincere and aligned with the shareholders, they either would much more skin in the game, and or swap their salaries for shares instead, they've done neither.

The war couldn't have come at a better time for RY, its given him the excuse and more time to stay silent on the non publication of the long awaited TEO.

I mentioned shareholder value, SP hit approx 40 back in 2015, and here we are some 7 years on, with a possible sale which'll return approx 7p/share, would people say that is company making, maximising shareholder value?

RY and the BOD, are the most inept, the most useless bunch I've come across over the past 20 years, and I've seen a few, but this lot take the top spot!

Kammy

I see MAC is in overdrive this morning, what is the purpose of hist latest posts?
Anyone wanting to invest in EUA, should do their own DD

Prior to the conflict, risk/reward, reward was in shareholders favour, as things stand today, risk/reward is evenly balanced. I am not one for moment questioning the assets, the BOD, or the value of the resources in the ground, my concern is the affect of of the conflict, the imposed sanctions, impact of any future sanctions the West may impose, the retaliatory sanctions by Putin.

I'm not even looking for an reassuring update from the BOD, right now it would mean nothing. By that, today they could release an RNS and say all is well, we're producing, and its BAU. Come tomorrow, the West could place more sanctions or Putin loses his head and takeover everything he can lay his hands on to boost the crumbling Russian economy.

We're in un-chartered waters, war situation is fluid, world order has changed, no one can say with any certainty whats around the corner.

Huge resources, I still trust the BOD, but I don't trust Putin, Zelensky or the West/NATO

Kammy

Good morning,

Its getting on to almost 3 months since the forced RNS, and one feeble RNS to say all is OK, apart from that, nothing, zilch, not word. What will it take for the BOD to provide an update? What will it take for RY to release the TEO?

Since 25th Jan, RY and the BOD have drawn handsome salaries, during that time what value have they added to the company or to the Sp? In any other organisation such inept, useless management would be kicked out without any golden goodbyes!!!

Kammy

It is what it is.
Before anyone says so what if a government got ousted in Pak.istan, well it does matter, P.akistan have been a key ally in fight against ISIS and etc. As a result, Pak.istan suffered over 100k losses (civilians and military).

With regards to regime change, US foreign policy, and US meddling, just look at 99/11, it was result of all foreign meddling which came back home to roost.

Anyways, its a bright Sunday, enjoy...and look forward to next week

Kammy

Everest_M87...I agree, its clear as daylight, the elected, democratic government of Pak.istan was ousted yesterday, opposition was aided and funded by uncle Sam. Since coming into power, Biden refused to engage with Imran Khan, because the later refused to allow the US to use Pak.istans airbases. Furthermore, Pak.istan intelligence services have evidence detailing what the US was upto, i.e. aiding opposition parties.

The biggest lie on the plant...is when the US says its doesn't have policy of regime change

Kammy

I'm a longer term, way way before the suspension, and want this to come good, for me and everyone else.
As much as I want positivity, enthusiasm and etc, it has to be tempered with some realism, and this is where MAC lets himself down.
Anyone invested knows EUA are sitting on huge, company making resources (unless its all a scam and we been mislead...NOT). My point, no one is questioning the resources, but damn it we're sitting right bang of an on-going conflict, these are abnormal times, and abnormal times sometime require abnormal behaviour and decisions.

For Mac to keep posting and repeat posting old news, articles and cut-outs doesn't help, to some it may come across desperate, to others its outright annoying.

MAC, please post something different, newsworthy, else refrain and show some patience like the rest on here.

No offence intended.

Kammy

I mentioned the US and other countries as example, definitely not in defence of Putin, two wrongs dont make a right.

Invading, attacking and killing civilians is un-defendable

Kammy

Of course it does, its all calculated before engaging in a conflict, or invading a foreign nation.
The US has accountants crunching numbers, presenting cost, risk, benefit analysis before any trigger gets pulled

Kammy

I would smack you back, or at least try.
Having said that, you'#ve come up with a poor strategy, as bystander, I'd like to know why you hit out in the first instance?
Its very very rare for countries to invade/attack another nation without some kind of reason (the reason may not be good at all), i.e.

US/UK invaded Iraq - to seek and destroy WMD
US invaded and bombed Afghanistan - ermm, looking for Osma Bin Laden
Saudi's Bombing Yeomen - ermm, because Yeomen side with Iran
Israel bombing Syrian military sites - ermm, Israels touted self protection
Russians invading Ukraine - ermm, dont want NATO on doorstep

There's a picture forming, powerfully, bullying nations tend to instigate war/invasion to protect or safeguard their interests

Kammy

Does it really matter if Nickel was to go to £200k/tonne? What really matters, will we get fair value for the resource we have?

Wake up RY....

Kammy

Morning Ian

Good to hear she is getting over the shock, hopefully fully recovery not too far away, best wishes.

Kammy

Navarre74...I'm very touchy and protective when it comes to my investments..period.

Kammy

meant to type strapped to a chair

Kammy

Nope, as much as I like his optimism, unfortunately MAC doesn't stop repeating himself, which in the end becomes count productive.

There used be a similar poster on the ENEGI OIL, he posted 24/7, full of optimism and enthusiasm, towards the demise of the company, he was going on full throttle, I think in the end men in white overalls came and took him away whilst stepped to a chair.

Kammy

Serendipidity, I hear you loud and clear, been there and have many t-shirts.

Stay strong, even if the entire lot got sold for 40p, you'd make a good ROI, albeit a few sleepless nights all the journey.

Kammy

Harvey33...Absolutely nothing wrong, we all started with a 1st post.

What is fundamentally wrong, is when newcomers post negativity, pick holes, try to sow seeds of doubt, quite often its so transparent, and sometimes its subtle, but in both cases it becomes quit obvious what their agenda is.

When I invest in a share, I don't go posting negativity, questioning the assets or credibility of the BOD, I'd have done my DD before making my investment decision, I post forward looking views on the company and if I have anything valuable, I share it with others.

It just doesn't make sense to invest in a share and then slate it....unless of course an invalid has an agenda

Kammy

Navarre75, simple question if I may, you opened your account yesterday, in your first post you antagonised existing holders, whats your purpose to be here?

Don't get me wrong, there is no law to say only the invested can come and post on here, but it does raise questions when a newcomer comes along and either antagonises shareholders, or starts picking holes in the company, assets and or the BOD. I'm asking because I've come across all sorts during my past 20 years of investing/trading, people always, always fall into some camp or another.

Kammy

CTC1988, I agree, 40p was a non-starter.
However, world order has changed and we shareholders must adjust our expectations. I stated 40p on the basis Lth's would get great ROI, and medium to short terms would get a decent ROI, therefore a win win for all, personally I wouldn't like to see anyone out of pocket.

Kammy

Tillywhiz, totally agree!

Prior to the conflict, the risk was very low, main concern was will we get fair value. The conflict has changed things, naturally now main fear/worry is around the company and its assets, can it stay under the radar, can it re-main un-bruised by current and any future sanctions (West against Russia, and Russian retaliatory sanctions). Fair value is now secondary, given the chance, most on here would take 40p !

People moaning about the BOD dragging this on serve no purpose, its the past, can't be undone, moan as much as you like but it is what it is. Clearly the BOD had a strategy and vision to achieve maximum shareholder value, unfortunately that plan got derailed by the conflict, I for one cannot and will not hold the BOD responsible.

Right now, regardless how dark the situation is or gets, we need to show patience, and trust the BOD to steer and navigate EUA through the raging storms.

All the vest best

Kammy

alreadyinuse, are you saying you sold because you spoke to Keith?
Be careful there, suggest you're implying Keith shared info with you and on that basis alone you sold, and now hoping to buy back in around 1.5p. Either that, or you're a complete b.ullsh.it merchant

Kammy