Appeal7 Feb 2024 13:26
broken for lunch.
very strong performance from our kc who has consistently dismissed, with great aplomb and copious evidence , points raised by conor ***en. referencing cases , letters written to ministers blah blah.
so far focus on significant and controversial and superbly presented evidence as to why it is a political decision and if it was controversial the executive would raise it. points out discussed in assembly , numerous letters written, all very similar ( ??) to all the senior ministers , asking them to raise it .. nobody did. names cases , bmap , selnas & craigavon in support. all reinforcing if something sig & con comes out of exec itself. quickly written .. excuse mistakes.